ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 31, 1973
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE(TION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    vs.
    )
    PCB 72—148
    PROCESSING
    AND
    BOOKS,
    INC., et al.,
    Respondents.
    ORDER
    Respondent Aeroglide Corporation, although adjudged not
    guilty in the Opinion and Order of this Board, ha~ filed
    a Motion for Clarification of the Opinion and Order.
    It appears
    that the Company’s manure drier sales might be enhanced if we
    were to use different language in our Opinion.
    We have reviewed
    the issues raised by Aeroglide and deny the Motion.
    Aeroglide
    would of course like to place all of the blame for the odors on
    the operation of the incinerator rather than the manure drier.
    We express no opinion
    as to the value of the manure drier if
    properly installed and operated but the record does indicate
    that odors were emitted from the manure drier during the periods
    of investigation in this case.
    The operation of the manure drier
    was a part of the odor problem.
    Modification of the Opinion is
    not justified.
    Motion denied.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
    hereby certify the above Order was adopted this 31st day of May, 1973
    by a vote of
    4
    to
    0
    8—
    117

    Back to top