ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 5
    ,
    1976
    VILLAGE OF ROSSVILLE,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—142
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Young):
    This matter comes before the Board on the petition of the
    Village of Rossville filed May 13,
    1976 seeking variance from
    Rules 203(c), 402 and 404(f)
    of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution
    Rules and Regulations
    as regards phosphorus.
    The Agency filed
    a Recommendation on June
    29, 1976;
    no hearing was held
    in this
    matter.
    The Village of Rossville is located in Vermilion County
    with a population of approximately 1,500 persons.
    At the present
    time the Village has a combined sewer system which collects both
    storm and sanitary wastes, but because the Village does not have
    a sewage treatment plant, these wastes are discharged untreated
    into the North Fork of the Vermilion River, which is tributary
    to Lake Vermilion.
    In May,
    1975,
    the Village was offered
    a Step
    I grant by the Agency for the preparation of a Facilities Plan.
    This Facilities Plan, which anticipates
    the use of either an
    oxidation ditch or aerobic—anaerobic lagoons for the proposed
    treatment plant, was submitted to the Agency in February,
    1976,
    and the Village
    is awaiting Agency approval thereof.
    Rule 203(c)
    sets a standard of 0.05 mg/l for phosphorus
    as
    P in any reservoir or lake,
    or in any stream at the point where
    it enters any reservoir or lake and Rule 402 requires that the
    Villagets effluent not contribute toa violation of the Rule 203
    (C)
    water quality standard.
    The phosphorus concentration in the
    North Fork of the Vermilion River as
    it enters Lake Vermilion
    presently exceeds
    .05 mg/l; therefore,
    the Village’s effluent is
    water quality limited to the Rule 203(c)
    standard of
    .05 rng/l
    phosphorus.
    Ifthe Village’s proposed treatment facility does
    not meet the .05 mg/l standard of Rule 203(c),
    the Agency cannot
    issue
    a construction permit unless the Village first obtains a
    variance from the Board.
    23
    259

    —2—
    In order to meet the 203(c)
    standard,
    the Village would
    have to install phosphorus removal facilities estimated to
    cost
    $52,000.00
    (oxidation ditch)
    or $73,000.00
    (aerobic-anaerobic
    lagoon)
    with yearly maintenance costs of $20,000.00 and $29,000.00
    respectively.
    Even with this phosphorus removal equipment, how-
    ever,
    the Village alleges the effluents will not comply with the
    0.05 mg/i phosphorus standard.
    Pumping the effluent into an
    adjacent watershed and land application were also considered,
    but these alternatives were also found undesirable for economic
    reasons.
    The Village alleges that the removal of phosphorus from the
    treatment plant’s effluent would have either little, or at most
    an insignificant,
    effect on the water quality of the North Fork
    of the Vermilion ~iver
    or Lake Vermilion.
    This allegation
    is
    based on the fact that the median phosphorus concentration in
    the North Fork
    is lower downstream
    (0.200 mg/i)
    from the Village
    than upstream
    (0.440 mg/i).
    As the Agency points out,
    however,
    while the concentration of phosphorus is less downstream,
    there
    is a substantial increase in total phosphorus being carried by
    the stream due to the increased flow volume found to exist down-
    stream.
    The fail
    in phosphorus concentration is unexplained;
    the Agency suggests that the phosphorus most likely is carried
    by bottom sediments into the Lake
    (R.
    p6)
    in which case
    it would
    not be measured by upper water sampling.
    Total phosphorus loading
    to the Lake is estimated to he 31,066 kilograms,
    of which the
    Agency estimates 2,381 kilograms
    (7.7)
    is discharged
    from the
    Village.
    The Board does not consider this
    to be an insignificant
    amount.
    The Village alleges they will suffer an unreasonable hardship
    if the Board denies this variance request,
    a denial which would
    prevent the Village from utilizing State/Federal grant funds
    to
    assist in the construction of a much needed sewage treatment
    plant.
    The Board also notes that on January
    5,
    1976, the Agency
    filed
    a Petition for Regulatory Change
    (R76—l) with the Board
    which would amend the Regulations by requiring only point sources
    of 1500 or more population equivalents
    to treat wastewater to a
    level not to exceed
    1 mg/I phosphorus prior to discharge.
    As
    justification for this proposal the Agency submits that eutrophi-
    cation studies by both the USEPA and the Illinois State Water Sur-
    vey show that the contribution of point source dischargers
    to the
    total phosphorus problem of lakes and reservoirs
    is small compared
    to the non-point source contribution.
    The Agency submits that non—
    point sources such as run-off waters from farm lands fertilized
    with phosphate base fertilizers, account for the overwhelming
    majority of the phosphorus loading of most lakes and reservoirs.
    In view of these considerations the Board believes the Village
    is entitled to the relief requested.
    The Board will require,
    however, that the Village design and construct the sewage treat-
    ment plant
    to allow for the possible future installation of appro-
    23
    260

    —3—
    priate phosphorus removal facilities.
    Because the Village plans
    to apply for a Pfeffer exemption, the Board will also grant a
    variance from Rules
    404(f) (ii) (A) and 404(f) (ii) (D)
    as those rules
    apply to phosphorus.
    While the Agency submits that this relief
    is not needed because Rule 409
    (Delays
    in Upgrading)
    provides the
    Village with the same relief until July
    1,
    1977,
    the Board does
    not agree.
    Rule 409 provides relief until July
    1,
    1977 from
    effluent standards but does not apply in situations
    in which the
    discharge is water quality limited.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s
    findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The Village of Rossville is granted a variance for the opera-
    tion of its proposed sewage treatment plant from the phosphorus
    limitations of Rules 203(c),
    402,
    404(f) (ii) (A)
    and 404(f) (ii) (D)
    of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution Regulations until August
    1,
    1981,
    subject
    to the following conditions:
    1.
    This variance will terminate upon adoption by the Board
    of any modification of the existing phosphorus water quality
    standards and effluent limitations and the Village of Rossville
    shall comply with such revised regulations when adopted by the
    Board.
    2.
    The sewage treatment plant shall be designed and con-
    structed to allow for the possible future installation of appro-
    priate phosphorus removal facilities,
    and
    3.
    Within 35 days of the date of this Order,
    the Village of
    Rossville shall submit to the Manager, Variance Section, Division
    of Water Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinois, 62706, an
    executed Certification of Acceptance and agreement to be bound
    to
    all terms and conditions of the variance.
    The form of said certi-
    fication shall be as
    follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We)
    ,
    ______________________________ having read
    the Order of the Pollution Control Board
    in PCB 76-142,
    understand and accept said Order,
    realizing that such
    acceptance renders all
    terms and conditions thereto
    binding and enforceable.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    23
    261

    —4—
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
    _________
    1976 by
    a
    vote of
    ______
    adopted o
    the
    ~
    day
    Of
    Illinois Pollution Co
    23
    262

    Back to top