ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 5
,
1976
VILLAGE OF ROSSVILLE,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 76—142
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Young):
This matter comes before the Board on the petition of the
Village of Rossville filed May 13,
1976 seeking variance from
Rules 203(c), 402 and 404(f)
of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution
Rules and Regulations
as regards phosphorus.
The Agency filed
a Recommendation on June
29, 1976;
no hearing was held
in this
matter.
The Village of Rossville is located in Vermilion County
with a population of approximately 1,500 persons.
At the present
time the Village has a combined sewer system which collects both
storm and sanitary wastes, but because the Village does not have
a sewage treatment plant, these wastes are discharged untreated
into the North Fork of the Vermilion River, which is tributary
to Lake Vermilion.
In May,
1975,
the Village was offered
a Step
I grant by the Agency for the preparation of a Facilities Plan.
This Facilities Plan, which anticipates
the use of either an
oxidation ditch or aerobic—anaerobic lagoons for the proposed
treatment plant, was submitted to the Agency in February,
1976,
and the Village
is awaiting Agency approval thereof.
Rule 203(c)
sets a standard of 0.05 mg/l for phosphorus
as
P in any reservoir or lake,
or in any stream at the point where
it enters any reservoir or lake and Rule 402 requires that the
Villagets effluent not contribute toa violation of the Rule 203
(C)
water quality standard.
The phosphorus concentration in the
North Fork of the Vermilion River as
it enters Lake Vermilion
presently exceeds
.05 mg/l; therefore,
the Village’s effluent is
water quality limited to the Rule 203(c)
standard of
.05 rng/l
phosphorus.
Ifthe Village’s proposed treatment facility does
not meet the .05 mg/l standard of Rule 203(c),
the Agency cannot
issue
a construction permit unless the Village first obtains a
variance from the Board.
23
—
259
—2—
In order to meet the 203(c)
standard,
the Village would
have to install phosphorus removal facilities estimated to
cost
$52,000.00
(oxidation ditch)
or $73,000.00
(aerobic-anaerobic
lagoon)
with yearly maintenance costs of $20,000.00 and $29,000.00
respectively.
Even with this phosphorus removal equipment, how-
ever,
the Village alleges the effluents will not comply with the
0.05 mg/i phosphorus standard.
Pumping the effluent into an
adjacent watershed and land application were also considered,
but these alternatives were also found undesirable for economic
reasons.
The Village alleges that the removal of phosphorus from the
treatment plant’s effluent would have either little, or at most
an insignificant,
effect on the water quality of the North Fork
of the Vermilion ~iver
or Lake Vermilion.
This allegation
is
based on the fact that the median phosphorus concentration in
the North Fork
is lower downstream
(0.200 mg/i)
from the Village
than upstream
(0.440 mg/i).
As the Agency points out,
however,
while the concentration of phosphorus is less downstream,
there
is a substantial increase in total phosphorus being carried by
the stream due to the increased flow volume found to exist down-
stream.
The fail
in phosphorus concentration is unexplained;
the Agency suggests that the phosphorus most likely is carried
by bottom sediments into the Lake
(R.
p6)
in which case
it would
not be measured by upper water sampling.
Total phosphorus loading
to the Lake is estimated to he 31,066 kilograms,
of which the
Agency estimates 2,381 kilograms
(7.7)
is discharged
from the
Village.
The Board does not consider this
to be an insignificant
amount.
The Village alleges they will suffer an unreasonable hardship
if the Board denies this variance request,
a denial which would
prevent the Village from utilizing State/Federal grant funds
to
assist in the construction of a much needed sewage treatment
plant.
The Board also notes that on January
5,
1976, the Agency
filed
a Petition for Regulatory Change
(R76—l) with the Board
which would amend the Regulations by requiring only point sources
of 1500 or more population equivalents
to treat wastewater to a
level not to exceed
1 mg/I phosphorus prior to discharge.
As
justification for this proposal the Agency submits that eutrophi-
cation studies by both the USEPA and the Illinois State Water Sur-
vey show that the contribution of point source dischargers
to the
total phosphorus problem of lakes and reservoirs
is small compared
to the non-point source contribution.
The Agency submits that non—
point sources such as run-off waters from farm lands fertilized
with phosphate base fertilizers, account for the overwhelming
majority of the phosphorus loading of most lakes and reservoirs.
In view of these considerations the Board believes the Village
is entitled to the relief requested.
The Board will require,
however, that the Village design and construct the sewage treat-
ment plant
to allow for the possible future installation of appro-
23
—
260
—3—
priate phosphorus removal facilities.
Because the Village plans
to apply for a Pfeffer exemption, the Board will also grant a
variance from Rules
404(f) (ii) (A) and 404(f) (ii) (D)
as those rules
apply to phosphorus.
While the Agency submits that this relief
is not needed because Rule 409
(Delays
in Upgrading)
provides the
Village with the same relief until July
1,
1977,
the Board does
not agree.
Rule 409 provides relief until July
1,
1977 from
effluent standards but does not apply in situations
in which the
discharge is water quality limited.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s
findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
The Village of Rossville is granted a variance for the opera-
tion of its proposed sewage treatment plant from the phosphorus
limitations of Rules 203(c),
402,
404(f) (ii) (A)
and 404(f) (ii) (D)
of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution Regulations until August
1,
1981,
subject
to the following conditions:
1.
This variance will terminate upon adoption by the Board
of any modification of the existing phosphorus water quality
standards and effluent limitations and the Village of Rossville
shall comply with such revised regulations when adopted by the
Board.
2.
The sewage treatment plant shall be designed and con-
structed to allow for the possible future installation of appro-
priate phosphorus removal facilities,
and
3.
Within 35 days of the date of this Order,
the Village of
Rossville shall submit to the Manager, Variance Section, Division
of Water Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency,
2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
Illinois, 62706, an
executed Certification of Acceptance and agreement to be bound
to
all terms and conditions of the variance.
The form of said certi-
fication shall be as
follows:
CERTIFICATION
I,
(We)
,
______________________________ having read
the Order of the Pollution Control Board
in PCB 76-142,
understand and accept said Order,
realizing that such
acceptance renders all
terms and conditions thereto
binding and enforceable.
SIGNED
TITLE
DATE
23
—
261
—4—
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Christan
L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
_________
1976 by
a
vote of
______
adopted o
the
~
day
Of
Illinois Pollution Co
23
—
262