ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
18,
1976
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 75—408
FRANKLIN
FLOWERS, ROGER FLOWERS
)
AND CITY OF VIRDEN,
a municipal
)
corporation,
Respondent.
Ms.
Mary Schlott, Assistant Attorney General, appeared on behalf
of
the
Complainant
Mr.
Edmond
H.
Rees,
appeared
on behalf of the City of Virden
Messrs. Franklin and Roger Flowers, appeared Pro Se
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
(Board)
upon the October 17,
1975 Complaint of the Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency)
charging the City of Virden
(Virden) with owning
and Franklin and Roger Flowers
(Flowers) with operating a refuse
disposal site without an operating permit in violation of Rule 202(b)
of the Board’s Solid Waste Regulations and Sections 21(b)
and(e)
of
the
Environmental
Protection
Act
(Act).
A
Settlement
Proposal
was
presented to the Board at a hearing held January 23,
1976.
This
Settlement was reduced to writing May 25,
1976.
The Board has often held that a violation of Rule 202(b)
of
the
Solid
Waste
Regulations
does
not
constitute
a
violation
of
Section 21(b)
of the Act.
Therefore,
that portion of the Complaint
alleging violation of Section 21(b) will be dismissed.
The
Parties
stipulate
that
Virden
owns
and
Flowers
operates
a
refuse
disposal
site
on
eleven
acres
in
Macoupin
County.
Refuse
deposits
are
limited
to
those
collected
from City customers of
Flowersv
scavenger service and refuse collected by the City
in its
public
works
operations.
22—131
—2—
Flowers obtained a development permit on August
8,
1974.
The
site was inspected several times
(Ex.
1—6).
Upon receipt of the
Complaint,
Flowers moved expeditiously to correct deficiencies at
the site.
Substantial compliance was shown by November 25,
1975,
and an operating permit was issued December
5,
1975.
Although Respondents have an agreement in which Flowers
is
liable to indemnify Virden for any litigation costs arising from
operation of the landfill, Virden has agreed not to seek indemni-
fication in the event a penalty is assessed herein.
The Respondents admit that they operated without an operating
permit from July
27,
1975 to the date of the filing of the Complaint.
The Board therefore finds that the Respondents have violated Rule
202(b)
of the Solid Waste Regulations and Section 21(e)
of the Act.
The Board finds that the violation was de minimus and that the
parties proceeded in good faith and with dispatch to obtain the
necessary permit.
Virden pays Flowers $6,500.00 per year to operate the site.
In addition, Flowers receive approximately $21,000.00 annually from
Virden customers for garbage collection.
The Flowers purchased a
bulldozer for the site at a cost of $34,650.00 through a bank loan.
The balance due as of January,
1976,
was $24,505.00.
Flowers paid
$2,100.00 in engineering fees related to the permit application re-
quirements.
The site operated at a net loss of $617.00 in 1974.
Franklin Flowers’ wife suffered kidney failure shortly after the
Flowers started operating the site.
This illness is not covered by
insurance and has resulted in a debt of $3,600.00 to date.
The Board finds that a penalty
is appropriate in order to pro-
tect the integrity of the permit system.
Therefore a penalty of
$100.00 will be assessed against the City of Virden.
In view of
Flowers financial hardship and good faith effort to obtain an opera-
ting permit, no penalty will be assessed against them.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
1)
The City of Virden and Franklin and Roger Flowers are
22—132
—3.-
found to have violated Rule 202(b)
of the Solid Waste Regu-
lations and Section 21(e)
of the Act from July 27,
1975, to
October 17, 1975.
2)
The City of Virden shall pay as a penalty for said vio-
lation the
sum
of $100.00.
Said penalty shall he
paid
by
certified check or money order payable to the State of
Illinois within
35 days of the date of this Order to:
State of Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois
62706
3)
The alleged violation of Section 21(b)
of the Act be
and is hereby dismissed.
I, Christan
L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on
the
day of
~
,
1976 by a vote of____________
Illinois Pollution
Board
22—133