BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
KEN BLOUIN,
Complainant,
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
INC.,
Respondent.
Ms. Dorothy M. Gunn
Clerk of the Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph
Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL)
)
)
)
)
NOTICE OF FILING
TO:
PCB No. 05-217
(Enforcement - Noise)
Bradley P. Halloran, Esq.
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
1.00 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL)
(PERSONS ON ATTACHED SERVICE LIST)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of
the Illinois Pollution Control Board an ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF EDWARD W.
DWYER, ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF THOMAS G. SAFLEY, and
RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO
COMPLAINANT'S COMPLAINT,
copies of which are herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 18, 2005
Edward W. Dwyer
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH
AMERICA INC.,
Respondent,
By:/s/ Thomas G. Safley
One of Its Attorneys
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1, Thomas G. Safley, the undersigned, hereby certify that I have served the
attached ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF EDWARD W. DWYER, ENTRY O
APPEARANCE OF THOMAS G. SAFLEY, and RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO COMPLAINANT'S COMPLAINT
upon:
Ms. Dorothy M. Gunn
Clerk of the Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
via electronic mail on August 18, 2005; and upon:
Bradley P. Halloran, Esq.
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Mr. Ken Blouin
6446 Lakeway Drive
Monee, Illinois 60449
by depositing said documents in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, in S
Illinois on August 18, 2005.
/s/ Thomas G. Safley
Thomas G. Safley
field,
TNTL:002/Fi1/N0F-C0S - Answer - Blouin
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
KEN BLOUIN,
}
)
Complainant,
)
v.
}
PCB No. 05-217
}
(Enforcement - Noise)
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
}
INC.,
Respondent.
}
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF EDWARD W. DWYER
NOW COMES Edward W. Dwyer, of the law firm of HODGE DWYER
ZEMAN, and hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent, TNT LOGISTICS
NORTH AMERICA INC.
Respectfully submitted,
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
INC.,
Respondent,
By:/s/ Edward W. Dwyer
Edward W. Dwyer
Dated: August 18, 2005
Edward W. Dwyer
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
gfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
TNTL:002/FiUE0A:
EWD-Blouin
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
KEN BLOUIN,
}
Complainant,
}
v.
}
PCB No. 05-217
}
(Enforcement - Noise)
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
}
INC.,
}
Respondent.
}
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF THOMAS G. SAFLEY
NOW COMES Thomas G. Safley, of the law firm of HODGE DWYER ZEMAN,
and hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent, TNT LOGISTICS NORTH
AMERICA INC.
Respectfully submitted,
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
INC.,
Respondent,
By:/s/ Thomas G. Safley
Thomas G. Safley
Dated: August 18, 2005
Edward W. Dwyer
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
TNTL:002/Fil/BOA-TGS-Blouiil
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
KEN BLOUIN,
)
Complainant,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 05-217
(Enforcement - Noise)
TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA
)
INC.,
)
Respondent.
)
RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSE TO COMPLAINANT'S COMPLAINT
NOW COMES Respondent, TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA INC.
("TNT"), by its attorneys HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, and for its Answer and
Affirmative Defense to Complainant's Complaint, states as follows:
contai
ANSWER
TNT has insufficient information to admit or deny the allegations
d in paragraph one of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
2.
TNT has insufficient information to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph two of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
3.
TNT admits that it operates a facility at the address and telephone number
identified by Complainant in paragraph three of Complainant's Complaint ("Facility").
To the extent that paragraph three of Complainant's Complaint contains any further
factual allegations, TNT denies the same.
4.
In response
to paragraph four of Complainant's Complaint, TNT admits
that its Facility conducts warehousing and distribution
activities. To the extent that
paragraph four of Complainant's Complaint contains any fu
denies the same.
er factual allegations, TNT
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
5.
Paragraph five of Complainant's Complaint states a legal conclusion that
does not call for a response. To the extent that paragraph five of Complainant's
Complaint contains any factual allegations, TNT denies the same. TNT further
specifically
denies that it has violated the numeric noise limitations referenced in
paragraph five of Complainant's Complaint.
6.
TNT
denies that any alleged activities referenced in paragraph six of
Complainant's Complaint constitute "pollution" or have resulted in the violation of any
of the numeric noise limitations referenced in paragraph five of Complainant's
Complaint. To the extent that paragraph six of Complainant's Complaint contains any
factual allegations, TNT denies the same.
7.
TNT denies the first sentence of paragraph seven of Complainant's
Complaint. In further response to the first sentence of paragraph seven of Complainant's
Complaint, TNT affirmatively states that the Facility began warehousing and distribution
operations on November 22, 2004. T
further affirmatively states that it has no
information regarding when, if at all, any alleged noise emissions from its Facility
allegedly would have been emitted to Complainant's property. Thus, TNT
has
ficient information to admit or deny the allegations contained in the second sentence
of paragraph seven of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same. To the
extent that paragraph seven of Complainant's Complaint contains any further factual
allegations, TNT denies the same.
8.
TNT
has insufficient information to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph eight of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
9.
TNT denies that Complainant is entitled to the relief he requests in
paragraph nine of Complainant's Complaint. To the extent that paragraph nine of
Complainant's Complaint contains any factual allegations, TNT denies the same.
10.
TNT has insufficient information to admit or deny any allegations
contained in paragraph 10 of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
11.
TNT has insufficient information to admit or deny any allegations
contained in paragraph 11 of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
12.
TNT has insufficient information to admit or deny any allegations
contained in paragraph 12 of Complainant's Complaint, and therefore denies the same.
WHEREFORE, Respondent TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA INC., by its
attorneys HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, prays that Complainant take nothing by way of his
Camp
t, and that the Illinois Pollution Control Board award TNT LOGISTICS
NORTH AMERICA
relief ust and proper in the premises.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
ive defense to Complainant's Complaint, TNT states as follows:
1.
TNT
operates the Facility in order to warehouse and distribute tires.
2.
Trucks deliver trailers of tires to the Facility.
3.
TNT
does not own or operate these trucks.
4.
Trucks also transport trailers of tires from the Facility.
5.
TNT does not own or operate these trucks.
Complainant in part appears to allege that noise from these trucks, which
does not own or operate, has, at Complainant's property, violated the numeric noise
limitations cited by Complainant in paragraph five of his Complaint.
3
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005
7.
TNT has no evidence that this is the case.
8.
However, if this is the case, such alleged violations relating to trucks
which
does not own or operate do not constitute violations of the numeric noise
limitations by TNT.
WHEREFORE,
Respondent TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA INC., by its
attorneys HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, prays that the Illinois Pollution Control Board find
in favor of TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA INC. on this Affirmative Defense, that
Complainant take nothing by way of his Complaint, and that the Illinois Pollution Control
Board award TNT LOGISTICS NORTH AMERICA INC. all relief just and proper in the
premises.
Respectfully submitted,
LOGISTICS NORTH
AMERICA
INC.,
Respondent,
By:/s/ Thomas G. Safley
One of Its Attorneys
Dated: August 18, 2005
Edward W. Dwyer
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
gfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
TNTL:002/Fil/Answer
- Blouin
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, AUGUST 18, 2005