ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September
4,
1987
MCLEAN COUNTY DISPOSAL
COMPANY, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 87—133
THE COUNTY OF MCLEAN,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by B.
Forcade):
This action
is an appeal filed August 31,
1987, pursuant to
Section 40.1
of the Environmental Protection Act (“Act”)
(Ill.Rev.Stat.
Ch.
111—1/2, par.
1040.1.
McLean County Disposal
Company, Inc.
(Petitioner)
appeals
the decision of the County
of
McLean (County)
denying
site location suitability approval.
Record Before
the County Board
P.A.
82—682,
also known
as SB—172,
as codified
in Section
40.1(a)
of the Act,
provides that the hearing before the Board
is
to “be based exclusively on the record before
the county board
or
governing body
of the municipality”.
The statute does not
specify who
is
to file with the Board
such record or
who
is to
certify
to the completeness or correctness
of
the record.
As the County alone can verify and certify what exactly
is
the entire record before
it,
in the interest of protecting the
rights
of all parties
to this action,
and
in order
to satisfy
the
intention of SB—l72,
the Board believes that the County must be
the party to prepare
and file the record on appeal.
The Board
suggests that guidance
in so doing can be had by reference
to
Section l05.l02(a)(4) of
the Board’s Procedural
Rules
and
to
Rules 321 through
324
of
the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.
In
addition to the actual documents which comprise the record,
the
County Clerk
shall also prepare
a document entitled “Certificate
of Record on Appeal”
which shall
list
the documents comprising
the record.
Seven copies
of the certificate,
seven copies of
the
transcript
of the County hearing and three copies of
any other
documents
in the record shall
be filed with the Board,
and
a copy
of
the certificate
shall
be served upon the petitioner.
The
Clerk
of
the County is given
21 days from the date of this Order
to “prepare, bind and certify the
record
on appeal”
(Ill.
Supreme
Court, Rule 324).
81—69
—2—
Section 40.1(a)
provides that
if there
is no final action by
the Board within 120 days, petitioner may deem the site location
approved.
The Board has construed identical “in accordance with the
terms of” language contained in Section
40(b)
of
the Act
concerning third—party
appeals
of
the grant of hazardous waste
landfill permits as giving the person who had requested the
permit
a)
the
right
to
a decision within the applicable statutory
time frame
(now 120 days), and b)
the right to waive
(extend) the
decision period (Alliance
for
a Safe Environment,
et
al.
v. Akron
Land Corp.
et al.,
PCB 80—184,
October
30,
1980).
The Board
therefore construes Section
40.1(b)
in like manner, with the
result that
failure of this Board
to act
in 120 days would allow
the site location applicant
to deem the site location approved.
Pursuant
to Section 105.104
of the Procedural Rules,
it
is each
party’s responsibility to pursue
its action, and to insist that
a
hearing on the petition
is
timely scheduled
in order
to allow the
Board
to review the
record and
to render
its decision within 120
days of
the filing of
the petition.
Transcription Costs
The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed
in
Town of Ottawa,
et al.
v.
IPCB,
et al.,
129
Ill. App.
3rd,
472
N.E.2d
150 (Third District,
1984).
In that case,
the Court
ordered the Board
to assume transcription
costs
(472 N.E.2d at
155).
The Supreme Court denied leave
to appeal on March
14,
1985.
In cognizance
of this
ruling,
the Board will provide
for
stenographic transcription
of the Board hearing
in this matter.
This matter
is accepted for hearing.
Hearing must be
scheduled within
14 days of the date
of
this Order and completed
within
60 days of
the date
of this Order.
The hearing officer
shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the time and location
of
the hearing at least
40 days
in advance of hearing
so that public
notice of hearing may be published.
After hearing,
the hearing
officer
shall submit an exhibit
list, written schedule for
submission
of briefs
if any and all actual exhibits
to the Board
within
5 days of the hearing.
Any briefing schedule shall
provide for final filings
as expeditiously as possible and
in no
event later
than 70 days from the date of
this Order.
If after appropriate consultation with the parties,
the
parties
fail
to provide an acceptable
hearing date or
if after
an
attempt the hearing officer
is
unable to consult with
the
parties,
the hearing officer
shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the schedule above.
This schedule will
only provide the Board
a very short
time period
to deliberate and
reach
a decision before the due date.
The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged
to expedite
this proceeding as much as
possible.
81—70
—3—
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only
on
a
waiver
of the decision deadline by the site location suitability
applicant and only
for the equivalent
or fewer number of days
that the decision deadline is waived.
Such waivers must be
provided
in writing
to the Clerk of
the Board.
Any waiver must
be
an
“open waiver”
or
a waiver
of decision until
a date
certain.
Because of requirements regarding
the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the site
location suitability applicant provides an open waiver or
a
waiver to
a date
at least 75 days beyond the date of the motion
to cancel hearing.
This should allow ample
time
for the Board
to
republish notice of hearing
and receive transcripts from the
hearing before the due date.
Any order
by the hearing officer
granting cancellation of hearing shall include
a new hearing date
at least
40 days
in the future and at least
30 days prior
to the
new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be promptly
informed
of the new schedule.
Because
this proceeding
is the
type
for which
the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets
a very short statutory deadline
for decisionmaking, absent
a waiver,
the Board will grant
extensions
or modifications only
in unusual circumstances.
Any
such motion must set forth
an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final
submissions,
as well
as the deadline
for
decision,
including response time
to such
a motion.
However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation
of the hearing officer
to
set a date pursuant to this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED
I, Dorothy
M.
Gunn, Cle~k of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the .above Order was adopted
on
the
~
day of _______________________,
1987,
by a vote
of
~
~
.
//
,~
Dorothy
M.
Gui-in, Clerk~
Illinois Pollution Control Board
81—7 1