ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October 17, 1980
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 79—200
    )
    LINDELL MINOR, et al.,
    Respondents.
    MS. CHRISTINE
    ZEMAN,
    ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON BEHALF
    OF THE COMPLAINANT.
    MESSRS. JOSEPH W. HICKMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW AND TERRENCE
    J. HOPKINS,
    STATES ATTORNEY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RE-
    SPONDENTS.
    ROGER L.
    RINNE, JERRY WIGGS, JOHN HENDERSON AND LARRY
    HENDERSON APPEARED PRO SE.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by D. Satchell):
    This matter comes before the Board upon a complaint filed
    September 26,
    1979 by the Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    naming
    as Respondents Lindell Minor and three others.
    Two sub-
    sequent amended complaints added five additional Respondents.
    The eleven counts of the second amended complaint allege viola-
    tions of Sections 21(b)
    and 21(e)
    of the Environmental Protection
    Act
    (Act), Rule 301 and other rules of Chapter
    7:
    Solid Waste
    Management
    (Rules)
    in connection with the operation of a landfill
    in Franklin County.
    On June 27,
    1980 a public hearing was he1ç~
    in Benton at which time the parties outlined a settlement agree-
    ment.
    Members of the public did not attend and the Board has
    received no public comment.
    The following persons have been named as Respondents in the
    second amended complaint:
    Lindell Minor
    (Minor)
    Owner of property on which the land-
    fill is situated.
    Jerry Wiggs
    (Wiggs)
    Original holder of permit no.
    1975-
    10—OP issued on June
    12, 1975 author-
    izing operation of solid waste man-
    agement site.
    S
    & L Sanitation,
    Inc.
    A Missouri corporation authorized to
    (S
    & L)
    do business in Illinois, now bankrupt.

    —2—
    Roger L. Rinne
    (Rinne)
    Larry G. Henderson
    (L. Henderson)
    John C. Henderson
    (J.
    Henderson)
    Noble Risley,
    Jr.
    (Risley)
    Robert Beatty
    (Beatty)
    County of Franklin (County)
    President and director of S
    & L
    Secretary,
    treasurer and director of
    S &L
    Vice—president and director of S
    & L
    Present holder of permit no.
    1975-10-
    OP
    transferred from Wiggs to
    him on
    November 19, 1979
    An individual sometimes doing business
    with Risley as Beatty and Risley Bull-
    dozing,
    a partnership or corporation
    located in Sesser
    A party to various written contracts
    with Respondents for refuse disposal
    services including operation of the
    site
    Ten of the eleven counts of the second amended complaint allege
    that various Respondents have at
    various times
    at the landfill site
    violated Section 21(b)
    of the Act and Rule 301 as well as more
    particular rules found in Chapter 7.
    Section 21(b)
    provides that
    no person shall cause or allow the open dumping of refuse in viola-
    tion of regulations adopted by the Board.
    Rule 301 provides that
    no person shall cause or allow the operation of
    a sanitary landfill
    unless each requirement of Part III of Chapter 7
    is performed.
    The
    more particular allegations of the complaint are summarized as
    follows:
    _____
    Rule
    Summary
    305(a)
    Daily cover--a compacted layer of at least
    six inches of suitable material on all ex-
    posed refuse at the end of each day of
    operation.
    305(c)
    Final cover--not less than two feet not
    later than sixty days following the place-
    ment of refuse In the final lift.
    303(a)
    Unloading--refuse shall be deposited in the
    toe of the fill or the bottom of the trench.
    Count
    I
    II
    III

    —3—
    IV
    303(b)
    Spreading and compacting--as rapidly as
    deposited,
    all refuse shall be spread and
    compacted into layers not to exceed a
    depth of two feet.
    V
    306
    Litter--all litter shall be collected from
    the site by the end of each working day and
    either placed in the fill or stored in
    a
    covered container.
    VI
    314(e)
    Leachate control——no person shall cause or
    allow the development of a sanitary landfill
    which does not provide adequate measures to
    control leachate.
    VII
    304
    Sufficient equipment--personnel and equip-
    ment to ensure that operations comply with
    the permit, Act and Rules.
    VIII
    314(f)
    Operation without adequate measures to con-
    trol dust and vectors.
    IX
    302,
    317
    Quarterly water monitoring data as required
    by permit.
    X
    308
    Scavenging operations at a sanitary land-
    fill site.
    XI
    Section
    Conducting refuse collection or disposal
    21(e)
    without a permit from the Agency.
    202(b) (1)
    After the hearing the parties filed on August 22, 1980 a
    stipulation and two proposals for settlement.
    The stipulated
    facts
    are summarized below.
    The references are to paragraph
    numbers in the stipulation.
    Respondent Minàr is the owner of property used as
    a solid
    waste management site located west of Benton in the NE
    ¼
    of SE
    ¼
    of Sec.
    23,
    T.
    6
    S.,
    R.
    2 E.,
    3 PM, Franklin County
    (112).
    Parts
    of the site were leased to various operators who conducted land-
    fill operations under contract with County.
    The history of the
    site is divided into three parts corresponding to the contracts
    with Wiggs,
    S
    & L and Risley and Beatty.
    Wiggs/County contract:
    On July
    8,
    1974 Wiggs entered into
    a written contract under which he was to provide County with re-
    fuse disposal
    services, including operation of the site,
    for the

    —4—
    period from August
    1,
    1974 until July 31, 1977
    (1111).
    On August
    1,
    1974 Minor leased the site to Wiggs for a three year period
    (1113).
    From August
    1, 1974 until on or about November 1, 1978
    Wiggs operated a refuse disposal or solid waste mangagement site
    there.
    At first Wiggs was alone but later he operated in con-
    junction with S
    & L by oral or written agreement
    (1114).
    On
    June
    12, 1975 the Agency issued to Wiggs permit no.
    1975—10-OP
    for the site
    (113).
    The Wiggs/County contract provided for a $50,000 performance
    bond posted with the County.
    Wiggs was to operate in compliance
    with state regulations and was to obtain permits.
    The County was
    authorized to take corrective measures if regulations were violated
    and was authorized to deduct the expense from the contractor’s
    monthly payment
    (1112).
    S
    & L/County contract:
    Minor leased the site by verbal or
    written agreement to S
    & L beginning on about October 28, l~76
    (1117).
    The County and
    S
    & L entered into a written contract for
    refuse disposal services, including operation of the site for the
    period from March
    1,
    1977 through February 28,
    1978
    (1115).
    From
    on or about October 28,
    1976 until on or about November 1, 1978,
    S
    & L operated a solid waste management site and a refuse disposal
    operation at the site
    (1118).
    On each day during this period refuse was received at the
    site and disposed of by S
    & L without a permit issued by the
    Agency
    (1142).
    In December. 1977 the County withheld for nonper—
    formance $5500 in payments otherwise due S
    & L under terms of
    their contract.
    In addition, the County has withheld S
    & L’s
    security of $7600 along with accumulatedinterest based on
    S
    & L’s nonperformance
    (1146).
    The
    S
    &
    L/County
    contract
    provided
    that
    the
    site
    would
    be
    operated
    in
    compliance
    with
    Illinois
    law.
    S
    &
    L
    was
    responsible
    for obtaining permits.
    Notice of deficiencies resulting from
    inspection were to be given to the contractor for corrective
    measures.
    The County was empowered to hire a third party for
    work involved in corrective measures.
    The resulting expense was
    to be deducted from the contractor’s monthly payment.
    The con-
    tract provided for a “proposal guarantee”
    to be held in lieu of
    a bond.
    Failure on the part of the contractor to do the work as
    specified in the contract was to be considered as just cause to
    forfeit
    (1116).
    Risley and Beatty/County contract:
    On December 21, 1977
    Minor agreed with Risley for lease of the site to Risley and
    Beatty Bulldozing for a period of three years from March 1,
    1978

    —5—
    to March 31, 1981
    (1121).
    On January 11,
    1978 County entered
    into a contract with Risley and Beatty Bulldozing for the latter
    to provide County with refuse disposal service including opera-
    tion of the site for the period of March
    1,
    1978 through March
    31,
    1981 with a three year option to renew
    (1119).
    On March
    1,
    1978 Risléy and Beatty begin operating on the portion of the site
    which neither S
    & Lnor Wiggs had operated, located east of the
    on—site road.
    S
    & L continued to manage the western portion of
    the site until November 1,
    1978
    (1122).
    After November
    1,
    1978
    Wiggs and S
    & L ceased to operate on the site
    (111114,
    18, 22,
    42).
    The Risley and Beatty contract provided that the site was to
    be operated in compliance with Illinois law.
    The County was
    empowered to make corrections with their own equipment or to hire
    a third party to do the work in the event suitable corrective
    measures were not taken within the appropriate time and to charge
    the cost to the contractor’s account
    (1120).
    On September 6,
    1979
    S
    & L was adjudicated bankrupt
    (114).
    On November 19,
    1979 the Agency transferred from Wiggs to Risley
    permit no. 1975—10—OP
    (118)
    On April 15,
    1980 Beatty’s interest was transferred to Ricky
    W. Benedict
    (Benedict) (119).
    On the date of the hearing Risley
    and Benedict were operating the site as Risley and Benedict and
    Sons
    (1110).
    From November 1,
    1978 to the present Risley and
    Beatty or Benedict have operated on the entire site.
    The site
    known as the Franklin County Landfill closed on July 30, 1980.
    In addition to the stipulation, the parties have presented
    two proposals for a settlement.
    The first is signed by the Agency
    and Wiggs,
    S
    & L, Rinne, and L.
    and J. Henderson.
    Wiggs admits
    the violations of Counts
    I through XI of the second amended com-
    plaint but the parties agree that no penalty will be assessed
    against him.
    Rinne and the Hendersons admit that they were officers and
    directors of S
    & L during the period of its operation of the site
    and
    admit that violations occurred as alleged during that period.
    S
    & L admits the violations as charged against it in Counts
    I
    through XI of the second amended complaint.
    The Agency has agreed
    that no penalty will be assessed against S
    & L, but that the
    approximately $13,000 in payments and security withheld from S
    & L
    by the County will be retained by the County to insure proper
    closure.
    The complaint is to be dismissed with respect to Rinne
    and J.
    and L.
    Henderson.

    —6—
    The second proposal for settlement is signed by the Agency and
    Minor, Risley, Beatty and County.
    These Respondents admit the viola-
    tions ~
    chargedagainSt them in Counts
    I through XI of the second
    amended complaint.
    These Respondents agree to cease and desist from
    further violations of the Act and Board Rules.
    The parties have
    agreed to a detailed compliance plan.
    The plan includes an eighteen
    day extension from the plan outlined at the hearing because of the
    heavy storms of June 29 and July 2.
    Respondents County, Minor, Risley and Beatty agree to the place-
    ment of final cover by midnight, August 18,
    1980 on the east part of
    the site; on the entire operated area south of the base line;
    and
    over the tires.
    They also agree to grade and compact the slopes of
    the drainage way in the east part of the site by that same time.
    County agrees to bring that area of the site located west of the
    haul road and north of the base line used in the application for
    supplemental permit no.
    79-2628 into compliance with the final cover
    requirements by October 18,
    1980.
    If Respondents Risley, Beatty and Minor complete the final
    cover and compacting work by the time agreed the County will pay to
    Risley and Beatty the balance of money withheld from S
    & L and the
    $23,000 security deposit provided to the County by Risley and Beatty
    under the terms
    of their contract.
    If the work is not completed by
    that time, the money will be withheld and the County will contract
    the work, using the monies withheld as payment.
    No civil penalty
    is to be assessed against County, Minor, Risley or Beatty.
    The Board notes that
    S
    & L Sanitation and some of the individ-
    ual Respondents have been involved in other enforcement actiofls in-
    volving similar allegations
    (PCB 74—419, May 22,
    1975,
    17 PCB 103;
    PCB 79—76, January
    24,
    1980,
    37 PCB 197;
    and PCB 79—77).
    The Board also notes that the settlement proposal is signed by a
    person representing S
    & L which is in bankruptcy.
    Since the agree-
    ment is regular on its face, the Board will assume that there
    is
    proper authorization from the bankruptcy court for disposition of
    the assets of
    S
    & L held by County.
    The Board notes that the agree-
    ments, by Minor, Risley, Beatty and County to close the site, and by
    the County to act if the others
    fail, are unconditional.
    In view of
    this the Board finds the settlement acceptable
    (Procedural Rule 331).
    If the provisions of the agreement with respect to use of the perform-
    ance bonds prove unenforceable it will not excuse the various parties
    from their agreements to bring the site into compliance.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.

    —7—
    ORDER
    1.
    Respondents Lindell Minor, Jerry Wiggs,
    S
    &
    L
    Sanitation,
    Inc., Noble Risley, Jr., Robert Beatty and the County of
    Franklin have violated Sections 21(b)
    and
    (e)
    of the Environ-
    mental Protection Act and Rules 202(b) (1),
    301,
    302,
    303(a),
    303(b),
    304,
    305(a),
    305(c),
    306,
    308,
    314(e),
    314(f) and 317
    of Chapter
    7:
    Solid Waste Management,
    substantially as al-
    leged in Counts I through XI of the second amended complaint.
    2.
    The complaint is dismissed with respect to Respondents Roger
    L.
    Rinne, Larry G. Henderson and John C. Henderson.
    3.
    No monetary penalty is assessed against any Respondent.
    4.
    Respondents Lindell Minor, Noble Risley, Jr, Robert Beatty
    and County of Franklin shall
    cease and desist violating the
    Act
    and
    Chapter 7:
    Solid Waste Management.
    5.
    Respondents
    shall carry out their obligations under the
    proposals for settlement filed August 22,
    1980 which are
    incorporated into this Order.
    6.
    The motion for leave to file second amended complaint is
    granted.
    IT IS SO
    ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby c~rtifythat b~ieabove Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    /~7~’
    day of 1i4~-t~1980 by a vote of LJ_O
    Illinois
    Control Board

    Back to top