ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
April
19,
1984
CITY
OF
OREGON,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 84—48
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by W.
3.
Neqa):
This provisional variance request comes before the Board
upon an April
19,
1984 Recommendation of the Illinois Environ—
mental Protection Agency
(Agency).
The Agency ‘recommends that
a
3-day provisional variance be granted to the City of Oregon
(Oregon)
from
35
Iii. Mm. Code 304.120(a),
35
Ii..
Adm. Code
304.141(a)
and 35 Iii. Adm. Code 309.208 to allow a variance from
its NDPES Permit requirements during the time that the Petitioner
replaces a wall between the contact and reaeration tanks of its
activated sludge process and to allow Oregon to apply liquid
sludge
from the aerobic digester and partially dried sludge from
the
sludge drying beds on nearby farmland.
(Rec.
1).
The
Petitioner owns and operates a wastewater treatment
plant
(WWTP)
which has a design average flow of 0.626 million
gallons per day
(MCD).
Oregon’s ~P
provides:
(1) primary
settling;
(2)
secondary treatment
(utilizing the contact stabil-
ization modification of the activated sludge process);
(3) aerobic
sludge disgestion;
(4)
sludge drying, and
(5) disinfection.
(Rec.
1).
oregon
is asking for a provisional variance to allow the de—
watering
of
the contact and reaeration tanks of its activated
sludge
process so that a new wall can he
installed between the
tanks.
(Rec.
1).
The Petitioner
is proposing to allow the
contents
of
these tanks to settle and then to pump the resultant
clear
liquid
through the chlorination process.
After chlorination
occurs,
the
liquid will be discharged.
The accumulated sludge
will
be pumped to a waste hauler and then applied to farmland by
injection
and plowing.
(Rec.
2).
During
the short time period that the contact and reaeration
tanks
are out
of
service, Oregon intends to treat the incoming
raw
sewage by:
(1) providing primary treatment in the primary
clarifier;
(2)
increasing settling
in the primary clarifier by
57-445
—2—
adding chemicals to aid settling;
(3) providing chlorination
before discharge;
and
(4) providing solids retention capacity by
land application of the contents of the sludge drying beds and
part of the aerobic digester contents.
(Rec.
2).
Oregon believes that it will take about two days to install
the new wall provided that no unforeseen difficulties are encoun-
tered.
As part of the Petitioner’s proposed plan,
the dewatering
of the tanks and installation of the wall will occur on a
weekend.
(Rec.
2).
During the weekend, incoming flows are
expected
to be reduced because there will be no flow from the
Carnation Company’s plant which is the primary industrial contrib-
utor to Oregon’s WWTP flows.
(Rec.
2).
The Petitioner has
stated that, before the dewatering of the tanks commences,
all
equipment,
necessary parts,
and sufficient personnel will be on
the site to appropriately handle any contingencies that may
arise.
(Rec.
2).
Since January,
1983,
the Petitioner has reported the follow-
ing levels for biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD) and suspended
solids
(SS)
on its discharge monitoring reports to the Agency:
Month
January,
1983
February, 1983
March,
1983
April,
1983
May,
1983
June, 1983
July,
1983
August,
1983
September,
1983
October,
1983
November,
1983
December, 1983
January,
1984
~
1984
Average
Flow
(MGI))
0.237
0.260
0.243
0.248
0.246
0.261
0.274
0.273
0.238
0.156
data missing
data missing
data missing
0.257
0.249
BOD
(mg/i)
14
10
8
data missing
5
6
4
10
6
8
data missing
data missing
data missing
data missing
7.9
SS
(mg/i)
10
12
10
data missing
5
8
5
10
7
9
data missing
data missing
data missing
7
8.3
The Board notes that the requisite discharge monitoring data
is missing for the months of April,
1983; November, 1983; December,
1983; January,
1984, and February, 1984.
It is assumed that the
Petitioner will expeditiously submit the necessary data to the
Agency for the aforementioned months.
Oregon plans to apply about 150,000 gallons of sludge from
the aerobic digester and about 3,000 cubic feet of partially
dried sludge from the sludge drying beds to the land.
The sludge
in question has a pH of approximately 7.8 and contains about 5
57-446
—3—
organic matter.
(Rec.
3).
The Agency believes that the Peti-
tioner’s plan is practical and workable.
Oregon’s sludge disposal
plan is designed to dispose of the sludge while providing solids
retention capacity during the time that the aeration tanks are
out of service.
(Rec.
3).
The Petitioner has asserted that,
because of the high water
conditions
in the receiving stream during this season of the
year,
the environmental impact during the time period that the
replacement work is done will be a minimal. The Agency agrees
with the Petitioner and also indicates that there will
he
a
minimal adverse impact on the environment.
(Rec.
3).
The Agency believes that the provisional variance
is appro-
priate because it sees no alternative to bypassing and dewatering
of the tanks since the wail must be installed
in order for the
treatment process to operate as designed.
(Rec.
3).
Accordingly,
the Agency believes that the denial of the provisional variance
would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship on the City of
Oregon.
Thus,
the
Agency
recoramends
that
the
Board
grant
the City of
Oregon
a 3—day provisional variance from Sections 304.120(a),
304.141(a),
and 309.208, subject to certain conditions.
Pursuar~
to
Section
35(b)
of
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
act,
the
Board
hereby
grants
the
provi~iional
variance
as
recommended.
This
Opinion
constitutes
the
Board’s
findings
of
fact
and
con~
clusions
of
law
in
this
matter
ORDER
The
City
of
Oregon
is
hereby
granted
a
provisional
variance
from
35
Ill.
Mm.
Code
304.120(a),
35
Ill.
Mm.
Code
304.141(a)
and
35
iii. Mm.
Code 309.208
to
allow
it
to
replace
a wall
between
the
contact
and reaeration tanks
of
its
activated
sludge
process and to allow the application of liquid sludge from
the
aerobic digester and partially dried sludge from the sludge
drying beds on nearby farmland, subject to the following conditions~
1.
The provisional variance shall
be
for a period of three
(3)
days.
2.
The Petitioner
mlst
begin work prior to May 26,
1984.
3.
The Petitioner
shall notify James Frost of the Agency’s
Compliance Assurance Section via telephone (Telephone
#217/782—9720) the day before Petitioner intends to begin
dewatering the tanks
to allow installation of the new wall.
57-447
*
4—
4.
The Petitioner shall pump the clear liquid from the
tanks being dewatered to the chlorination process for disinfec
tion prior to discharge.
5.
During the time period that the aeration tanks are out
of service,
the Petitioner shall provide primary settling
and disinfection to the incoming raw sewage, and retention
of captured solids from the raw sewage.
The Petitioner
shall operate and maintain the associated treatment units so
as to provide the best treatment possible during this period.
6.
Each day that the aeration tanks are out of
service,
the
Petitioner shall sample the treatment plant effluent and the
receiving stream both upstream and downstream of the discharge
at 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.
These samples shall be analyzed
for BOD, suspended solids,
and dissolved oxygen;
and the
results recorded.
7.
The Petitioner shall apply the liquid sludge from the
aerobic digester and the partially dried sludge from the
sludge beds uniformly to the 14.67 acre site indicated on
the map submitted with the variance petition, maintaining
necessary
buffers
around
any swale areas located on the site
and along the boundaries of the site.
8.
The Petitioner shall retain a minimum of 5,000 gallons
of sludge,
from either the aeration tanks or the aerobic
digester,
to be used as seed sludge to reestablish the
secondary treatment process when the aeration tanks are put
back into service.
9.
The Petitioner shall submit in writing the results of
the tests performed on the samples collected as part of this
variance to James Frost,
and the dates and times that the
work was begun and completed.
This information shall be
submitted within 15 days after the work is completed to the
address below.
10,
Within 10 days of the date of the Board’s Order, the
City of Oregon shall execute a Certificate of Acceptance and
Agreement which shall be sent to:
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, Division of Water Pollution Control,
Compliance Assurance Section, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
Illinois
62706.
This certification shall have the following
form:
CE RTIF IC ATI ON
I,
(We),_________________________________,
having read
the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 84-48 dated
April
19,
1984,
understand and accept the said Order,
realizing
that such acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
binding and enforceable.
57-448
Petitioner
By:
Authorized Agent
Title
Date
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED.
I,
Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
was adopted on the
~g
~-
day of
,
1984 by a vote
of
~
--
~
~
o~(
Christan
L.
Moffe1~’,)~jlerk
Illinois Pollution~ontrolBoard
57-449