ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 10,
    1979
    CITY OF MONMOUTH,
    Petitioner,
    v,
    )
    PCB 79—36
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND ORDER OF
    THE BOARD
    (by Dr. Satchell):
    This
    matter comes before the Board on a variance peti-
    tion
    filed
    by the City of Monmouth (Monmouth)
    seeking relief
    from Chapter
    3,
    Board Rule 962(a).
    Petitioner seeks to ex-
    tend sewer mains to provide service to include existing
    homes inside the city which presently use septic tanks and
    future homes
    to be built
    in the area to be served.
    The
    Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency) recommended that
    the variance be granted with conditions.
    Petitioner has
    waived its right
    to a hearing and filed no response to
    Agency~srecommendation.
    This Opinion
    is based on the
    facts
    alleged
    in
    the petition and the Agency’s recommendation.
    On
    April
    6,
    1979 the Agency filed a related enforcement action,
    ~
    Monmouth, PCB 79-79.
    Monmouth is on the Agency~sCritical Review List of
    sewer systems approaching hydraulic capacity or design capa-
    city.
    On January 15,
    1979 it was reported to have 217 PE of
    remaining capacity.
    The recommendation alleges that the
    city
    sewage
    treatment plant has
    a design capacity of 1.4
    MGD,
    Approximately
    1 MGD is bypassed into Markham Creek.
    No facts are before the Board concerning the strength and
    nature of this discharge,
    Under the circumstances, any
    additional
    load on the system will be bypassed directly into
    Markham Creek,
    The pleadings contain no assessment of the
    environmental impact of this existing or proposed discharge.
    Markham Creek was, however, classified by the Agency in 1974
    as semi—polluted both upstream and downstream from Monmouth.
    (Recommendation, ¶13)
    It is assumed that the proposed
    hook-ons will result in a simple increase in the quantity
    discharged but will not result in a new and different kind
    of pollution.
    Monmouth is in the process of constructing a new storm
    sewer which it claims will reduce the flow in the existing
    33—467

    —2—
    combined sewer,
    Petitioner alleges that this will
    be comple-
    ted in the summer of 1979.
    However,
    the Agency claims that
    this will not eliminate the discharges
    since the bypassing
    occurs even in dry weather.
    Monmouth
    is
    in the facilities
    planning stage of the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works
    Construction Grant Program.
    It
    is alleged that the bypass
    will be eliminated by the fall of 1981 when a new sewage
    treatment plant
    is operational.
    Monmouth seeks in this variance to build a force main
    pumping station and 10,535 feet of new sanitary sewer.
    The
    addition will be in two sections along Park-Way Manor and
    East Second Avenue.
    There are twenty-five existing houses in
    the area which are now on septic tanks.
    Reports cite clay
    and groundwater as
    intetfering with septic drain fields.
    The city health officer reported four septic tanks which dis-
    charge into the streets during heavy rain.
    (Pet.
    Ex.
    2)
    The Illinois Department of Public Health has confirmed that
    there
    are
    homes with septic tank problems.
    The Petition
    includes evidence that a public health hazard exists.
    Petitioner cites several hardships:
    the money is pres-
    ently available for construction of the sewers and costs are
    escalating; the septic tank situation poses a health hazard;
    the cost of constructing adequate individual septic systems
    is too great considering that they will be unneeded in only
    two years; and the city needs more sewers to grow.
    This last
    hardship
    is not arbitrary or unreasonable.
    Accordingly,
    the
    variance must be denied with respect to any new construction
    which will increase the sewage treatment plant loading.
    The septic systems which post an immediate health hazard
    must be remedied as soon as possible.
    The Board finds that
    requiring further upgrading of individual sewage systems
    would impose an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship,
    in light
    of the expected completion of the upgrading of the sewage
    treatment plant in two years.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
    and conclusions
    of
    law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It
    is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that the
    City of Monmouth is granted a variance from Rule 962(a) of
    Chapter 3 until December 31,
    1981,
    or until its improved
    sewage treatment plant is operational, whichever occurs first,
    upon the following conditions:
    a.
    Monmouth shall complete its storm sewer project
    before connecting any homes
    to its new sanitary
    sewers,
    33—468

    —3—
    b.
    Within forty—five days
    of the grant of this
    variance, Monmouth shall
    submit
    to the Agency a
    list of all homes existing at this time in the
    area to be served by the new sewers,
    and shall
    indicate which have been confirmed as being hazar-
    dous
    to health by the Illinois Public Health
    Department.
    c.
    Monmouth shall connect only those homes existing
    at the time this variance is granted with septic
    tank problems which are confirmed as being hazar-
    dous to health by the Illinois Public Health
    Deaprtment.
    d,
    Within forty-five days of the date of this Order,
    Petitioner
    shall execute and forward to the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency, Variance Section,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706,
    a Certification of Acceptance and Agreement to be
    bound to all terms and conditions
    of this variance.
    This forty-five day period shall be held in abey-
    ance for any period this matter
    is being appealed.
    The form of the Certification shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),
    ________________,
    having read and fully under-
    standing the Order in PCB 79-36,
    hereby accept that Order and
    agree to be bound by all of
    its terms and conditions.
    SIGNED________________________
    TITLE___________________________
    DATE_____________________________
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    herflby certify the above Opinion and Order were
    adopted on the
    JeJ~
    day of
    ________________,
    1979 by a vote
    of
    ...~-O
    Christan L, Moffet
    ,~4erk
    Illinois Pollution
    óñtrol Board
    33—46
    9

    Back to top