ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 29, 1979
EXXON CHEMICAL COMPANY, U.S.A.,
an
)
operating division of EXXON
)
CHEMICAL
COMPANY,
a division of
)
EXXON CORPORATION,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 79—162
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Dr.
Satchell):
This matter comes before the Board upon a petition for
variance filed on August
13,
1979 by Exxon Chemical Company
U.S.A.
Petitioner requests
a modification and continuation
until March 31, 1980 of a variance granted for two plants
operated by Exxon in Lake Zurich,
Illinois by the Board in
PCB 77-329 on August 24,
1978.
Specifically Petitioner requests
a deletion of the requirement for a program and schedule for
Plant #2 and a continuation of variance
as to Plant
*2 from the
total dissolved solids and chloride standards of Rules
203(f)
and the total suspended solids standard of Rule 408(a)
of
Chapter
3:
Water Pollution (Chapter
3)
until March 31, 1980 at
which time Plant #2 will be shut down.
The Environmental Pro-
tection Agency
(Agency)
filed a recommendation on September 19,
1979.
Petitioner filed a response on October
1,
1979.
The
Agency then filed an amended recommendation on October
4,
1979.
No
hearing has been held in this matter.
Exxon is engaged in the processing and distribution of
oolyethylene and polypropylene products at this site.
Plant *1
which was also included in the earlier variance was to complete
the segregation of its effluent streams as was required on or
before August 15,
1979.
Plant
#2 as previously mentioned will
discontinue
the discharges of process effluent, consisting of
cooling tower blowdown, boiler blowdown, and some contact cooling
water, on or before March
31,
1980.
No future use of this part
of the facility is planned.
Office space
at Plant #2 will con-
tinue to be used and the sanitary sewage will continue to be
discharged to the Village of Lake Zurich sewer system.
~6—1~
—2—
Petitioner contends that requiring completion of the seg-
regation of effluent streams at this plant when the discharges
are
to cease on March
31,
1980 would impose an arbitrary and
unreasonable hardship upon Petitioner.
Petitioner asserts that
the discharge is not one which creates any risk of environmental
damage or hazard to public health and welfare.
The Agency notes
that this statement
is not substantiated by Petitioner.
An
Agency technical report cites
a possible marginal adverse impact
on the potential beneficial
uses of the receiving waters.
The
Agency further states this may change once the segregation of
process water and storm water has been completed.
The Board
notes that
as of this writing that process should be complete
for Plant #1.
The Agency does recommend the grant of the variance since
the time of continued operation
is
so short
it is doubtful any
upgrading to meet Chapter
3 standards could be accomplished in
that length of time.
The Board
finds that to require Petitioner to continue
modification of Plant
#2 at this time would be an arbitrary
and unreasonable hardship.
The Board will require the Agency’s
suggested conditions.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It
is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that
Exxon Chemical Corporation is granted a variance for it
Plant
#2 in Lake Zurich,
Illinois
from the total dissolved solids and
chloride standards of Rule 203(f)
and the total
suspended solids
standard of Rule 408(a) of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution until
March
31,
1980.
The Board modifies its Order
in PCB 77—329,
dated August 24,
1978,
to delete the requirement of completion
of a program for segregation of storm and process flow at
Plant
#2.
This variance and modification are subject to the
following conditions:
1.
That Petitioner not increase wastewater
flows or
concentrations over that previously discharged.
36—184
—3—
2.
Within forty—five days of the date of this Order,
Petitioner shall execute and forward to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, Variance Section,
2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois 62706,
a
Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound
to all terms and conditions of this variance.
This
forty-five day period shall be held in abeyance for
any period this matter is being appealed.
The form
of the Certificate
shall be as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I,
(We), ______________________________, having
read and fully understanding the Order in PCB 79-162,
hereby accept that Order and agree to be bound by all
of its terms and conditions.
SIGNED
__________________________
TITLE
________________________
DATE
__________________________
3.
The Agency, pursuant to Rule 914 of Chapter
3:
Water
Pollution, shall modify the NPDES permit consistent
with the conditions set forth in this Order,
including
such interim effluent limitations as may reasonably be
achieved through application of best practicable
operation and maintenance practices
in existing
facilities.
I, Christan
L. Noffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the a ove Opinion and Order were
adopted on the
~4’~
day of
17
1979 by a vote of
V—o.
Christan L. Mof
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
36—185