ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 12, 1973
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 72-245
KANKAKEE CONCRETE PRODUCTS,
Respondent.
Larry
R.
Eaton, Special Assistant Attorney General, on behalf
of Complainant;
Charles 0.
Henry on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by Mr. Seaman):
On July 15,
1972,
the Agency filed complaint against
Respondent, Kankakee Concrete Products,
the owner and onerator
of a concrete mixing plant and a concrete block manufacturing
operation in Kankakee, Kankakee County.~I1linois~ The complaint
alleges violation of Sections 9(a),
9(b),
12(a)
and 12(d)
of
the Environmental Protection Act.
Respondent is charged with operating its facility in such
a manner as to cause, threaten or allow the discharge or
emission of dust and other contaminants into the atmosphere so
as to cause or tend to cause air pollution, either alone or in
combination with contaminants from other sources.
Respondent is
further charged with operating its facility in such
a manner as
to cause or threaten the discharge of lime and cement fines,
dissolved chemicals, and boiler blowdown water, into
a storm
discharge ditch,
so as to cause or tend to cause water pollu—
tion,
either alone or in combination with contaminants from
other sources.
This cause comes before the Board with a lengthy and
detailed Stipulation entered into by the respective parties
which “accurately describes the situation and presents to the
Board the pertinent facts and information.~
From the Stipulation,
it
is apparent that Respondent has violated the enumerated sections
of the Act,
that Respondent has taken substantial steps toward
the abatement of said violations, and that Respondent proposes
8—
455
—4—
to take additional steps in order to achieve
full compliance.
According to the Stipulation,
the Agency believes that the
work which is now being completed by Respondent and the pro-
posed work, when completed, will substantially reduce the air
and water
pollution from Respondent’s plant,
However, because
of the nature and multiplicity
of problems involved,
the Agency
is of the opinion that it is impossible to determine, before
all such work is
completed, whether it will satisfactorily
correct all problems.
The proposed remedial action set forth in the Stipulation
is quite
lengthy and detailed, and it would serve no purpose
to
set
it out in this opinion.
The Stipulation is attached
and hereby incorporated as part of this opinion.
This Board
is satisfied that the measures agreed upon by the parties rep-
resent
a reasonable and bona
ficle attempt to solve en masse
Respondent’s pollution problems.
It is noted that Respondent
has,
to date, expended approximately $22,000 for abatement
devices and procedures and estimates that
a further expenditure
of approximately $20,000 will be necessary to complete its
proposed plans.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclu-
sions of law of the Board.
IT
IS
THE
ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that
Respondent, Kankakee Concrete Products, shall:
1.
Complete the work as set out in Paragraphs
8 and 19
of
the Stioulation;
2.
Apply for the permits
as set out in Paragraph 11 and
such additional permits as may be necessary for the construction
and installation of
the truck car-wash facility;
3.
Within
35
days from the date of
this Order post a
performance bond in a form satisfactory
to the Agency in the
amount of $20,000, guaranteeing
compliance with the orders
herein provided;
4.
Within
35 days from the date of this Order pay to the
State of Illinois the sum of $1,000.
Penalty payment by
rertified
check or money order payable to the State of
Illinois
shall
be
made
to:
Fiscal Services Division,
Illinois Environ-
mental
Protection
Agency,
2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield,
illinois 62706,
,
Cnr~stan
Mof:ett,
Clerk of the lilinois Pollution Control
~
~ertily
at~e
amove
Thinio~ a~dOrder woo adc~ted
ov
~
r~om
the
/____
day
of
~i
a
ntg
~i
j.~
8—456
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
)
)
ss,
COUNTY OF
KANKAKEE
)
BEFORE
THE
P0tL~ION
CON~OLBOARD
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
k.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
PCB
72-245
vs.
)
)
KANKAKEE
CONCRETE
PRODUCTS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
STIPULATION
NOW
COMES,
The
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Complainant,
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
“Agency”),
and
KANKAKEE
CONCRETE
PRODUCTS,
Respondent,
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
“Kankakee
Concrete”),
the
parties to
the
above
entitled
cause
and
agree
and stipulate as follows:
1.
That on May 4,
1971 and at all times thereafter,
Kankakee uoncrete has been a corporation authorized to do
business in the State of Illinois, and has continually, during
said period, operated a concrete mixing plant, and a concrete
block manufacturing operation at 1781 5. Risser
St., Kankakee,
Kankakee
County, Illinois.
2.
That Kankakee Concrete operates
said plant on a tract
of land in
City of Kankakee which tract of land is approximately
8.34 acres in size,
and is of a triangular
shape.
That
a copy
of a plat is attached to the original copy of this Stipulation,
marked Exhibit “A”, and the area of the Kankakee Concrete plant
is
outlined thereon in red, and said plat is incorporated herein
by reference.
3.
That the Kankakee Concrete plant is bounded on the south
by a residential area of the City of Kankakee,,and is bounded
on the west by a residential area of the City of Kankakee,
8—457
That a track of the New York Central Railroad Company forms the
third boundary to the property,
and
there are
open fields and
commercial operations on
the other side of
said railroad
track.
That an aerial photo
(which shows the location of the Kankakee
Concrete
plant)
is attached to the original copy of this Stipu-
lation, marked Exhibit “B”,
and is incorporated
herein.
4.
That the Agency has
received complaints
from approximately
five residents living in the area of the Kankakee Concrete plant.
That said complaints concerned
the emission of dust and other
contaminants into the air by Kankakee Concrete and the runoff of
lime,
cement fines, and caustic water onto the property of residents
living to the south of the Kankakee Concrete plant.
5.
That representatives of the Environmental Prc~tection
Agency, on May
4,
1971, August 10,
1971, October 1,
1971, and on
other dates, conducted investigations of the Kankakee Concrete pre-
mises and the operations,
and did interview citizens living in the
area as to what,
if any,
complaints they had concerning the Kankakee
Concrete operation.
6.
That at the time of the said investigation by the Agency,
and on the dates alleged in the
complaint,
the following air pollutior
problems existed and have continued to exist,
except as hereinafter
set forth, which operations and activities by Kankakee Concrete
constitute violations of Section 9
(a) of the Environmental Protectior
Act
as
alleged in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint on file in this cause:
(a)
That substantial amounts of dust were being emitted from
the concrete batch mixing plant and
from the ready mixing plant and
from
the
ready
mix
plant.
(b)
That the
dust emitted from the operations set out above,
together with the dust from the other operations from Kankakee
Concrete
settled,
in part,
on the plant area, and
that:
no operations
which were satisfactory
in their
nature were being conducted by
Kankakee Concrete
to collect,
sweep, or cover the
dust,
so that it
—2—
8
—
458
would
not
be
blown
from
the
plant
during
windy
periods.
(c)
That
the concrete
trucks
of
Kankakee
Concrete
entered
the
plant
from
Risser
Street,
which
is
shown
on
Exhibit
A
attached
hereto.
That
the
plant
roads
were
made
of
gravel or crushed
rock,
and
the
dust
from
the
other
operations, which collected
on the
plant
roads
and
on
the
nearby
access
streets
to
the
plant,
was
continually
stirred
and
sent
into
the
atmosphere
by
wind
and
by the large truck traffic associated with the operations of
Kankakee Concrete.
(d)
That
Kankakee
Concrete
washed
their
trucks
in
an
open area on
the plant property,
and
the
waste
water,
which
evaporated on the property, contained cement fines and
lime
which formed dust which was also blown from the property by wind
and
the
said
truck
traffic.
7.
That
Kankakee
Concrete
has,
prior
to
the
execution
of
this
Stipulation,
taken
the
following
steps
to
abate
said
air pollution:
(a)
That Kankakee Concrete did, in December,
1971,
purchase
and
place
into
operation,
a
Dusty
Dustless
dust collector on it’s
ready
mix
plant.
(b)
That Kankakee Concrete, during 1972 has entered into
a program to oil the plant area, which is not surfaced with
concrete,
which
oiling
has
been
done
periodically,
and
which
has substantially decreased dust
emissions into the air, caused
by
wind
or
said
truck
traffic.
(c)
That Kankakee Concrete has, during 1971 and 1972,
continued
to
expand
the
area
of
their
plant,
which
is
surfaced
with a
concrete slab, which area are primarily used for the
storage of concrete blocks manufactured by the plant and for roadways.
8,
That Kankakee Concrete proposes to take
the
following
additional
steps
to
abate
the
air
pollution
problems:
(a)
To purchase
and install within 120 days of the
day
8
—
459
hereof,
a Dusty Dustless dust collector appropriate in size and
features, on the.cement block plant.
(b)
To rent or purchase a sweeper to sweep the paved
portion of the plant
and to sweep the access roads and streets
leading into the plant.
(c)
To continue their oiling program for the unpaved
portion of the plant area,
and
to oil said premises when needed,
and
to
conduct
said
oiling
program
at
such
times
and
in
such
a
manner
so as not to violate
the Environmental Protection Act,
the
Water
Pollution
Rules
and
Regulations
or
other
applicable
laws
or
regulations.
(d)
That Kankakee Concrete agrees to sweep said premises
when
needed
arid, at least,
once
a week during the months of
April
-
November of each year and
when
needed
during
the
months
of November
-
March.
9.
That Kankakee Concrete and the Agency believe that the
work, which is now being completed by Kankakee Concrete, and the
proposed work, when completed, will substantially reduce dust
emissions from the Kankakee Concrete plant.
That because of
the
nature
arid multiplicities of problems involved,
it is impossible
to determine,
before all such work is completed, whether it will
satisfactorily correct all problems of dust emission.
10.
That Kankakee Concrete installed the Dusty Dustless
bag collection device on their ready mix plant in December,
1971,
without obtaining an installatim permit from the
Agency in
violation of Section 9
(b)
of the Environmental Protection Act
and Rule 3-2.100 of the Air Rules,
as alleged in paragraph 2 of
the Complaint.
11,
That, Kankakee Concrete agrees
to immediately apply
for a permit for the operation of said Dusty Dustless dust collector
-4-
8
460
which
was
installed
in
December,
1971,
and further agrees to
immediately apply for
a construction permit from the Agency
for
the Dusty Dustless dust collector, which they intend to
install on said concrete block plant.
12.
That an order should be entered by the Pollution
Control Board ordering Kankakee Concrete to complete the work
as set out in paragraph 8 above, and to apply for the permits
as set out in paragraph 11.
13.
That
the
order
of
Pollution
Control Board should also
require a subsequent study to be conducted
at a date after all
wrk provided for herein has been completed,
to determine that
the
actions
taken
and
to
be
taken
by
Kankakee
Concrete
satisfac-
torily
control
dust
emissions
from
said
plant,
and
that
this
case
should
remain
open
pending
the
results
of
said
further
study,
so
that
further
appropriate
orders
may
be
entered
after
said
study
has
been
completed.
14.
That investigations of Kankakee Concrete plant were
also conducted by representatives
of the Agency in regard to
possible water pollution problems.
15.
That
Kankakee
Concrete
does
not
admit that discharges
coming from it’s property cause
or tend to cause water pollution
either alone or in combination with contaminants from other
sources in violation of Section 12
(a) of the Environmental
Protection Act.
16.
That Kankakee Concrete does stipulate that on September
27,
1971,
an
investigation
of
the
Kankakee
Concrete
plant
was
conducted by Mr. John C. McLane, Supervisor of the Kankakee
Sub-Unit of the
Illinois River Basin of the Illinois
Environ-
mental Protection Agency,
and th’t on said date Mr. McLane found
the following facts and observations to he true:
—5—
8.—46~
(a)
That water drains from the Kankakee Concrete tract
of land
to
the
south
into
the
residential
area,
(b)
That
on September 27,
1971, water was flowing from
Kaokakee Concrete across Moore Street, in the City of Kankakee,
and then continuing across two vacant lots into an alley where
the
flow
was
going
into
a storm sewer of the City of Kankakee,
through a manhole.
That a sketch is attached hereto as exhibit
“C”,
which
shows
the
general
course
upon
which
said
water
was
flowing,
and which indicates that said
~orm sewer discharges into
a
drainage
ditch
which
drainage
ditch
discharges
into
the
Kankakee
River
approximately
one
mile
south
of
the
Kenkakee
Concrete
plant.
(c)
That said flow referred to on said paragraph B above,
was turbid
and
light
gray
in color, and
there were cement fines
observed therein.
(d)
That On September 27,
1971,
said John McLane also
observed a pink colored discharge
in the drainage ditch which
runs along
the
railroad
track
on
the
east
side
of
the
property
and discharges into the paved ditch shown on Exhibit “C”.
(e)
That said discharge was coming from the Kiln building
which housed the Kiln heating system and
boiler,
which
is
used
to
dry
and
cure
pre-formed
concrete
pieces
and
that said discharge
appeared
to be boiler blowdown from said system.
(f)
That attached hereto, marked Exhibit “D”,
is a lab-
oratory analysis sheet showing the results of the analysis of
a sample collected from said drainage ditch, which runs along
said railroad track.
(g)
That said drainage ditch discharges into
a paved concrete
ditch, which runs westerly across the property of Kankakee Concrete
before entering a storm sewer through a manhole.
That said storm
sewer runs underground for several blocks through
the City of
Kankakee before discharging into and
forming
an open drainage
ditch which continues in an easterly direction and discharges into
-6—
8
—
462
the
Kankakec
River
approximately
one
r~lefrom the Kankakee
Concrete
premises.
(h)
That no samples were collected on said date from either
the drainage ditch or the Kankakee River.
17.
That
the investigation of the Agency discovered
the
following additional water pollution problems at
the Kankakee
Concrete
plant:
(a)
That the drainage
from the Kankakee Concrete plant,
as
noted
above,
flows
in
a
southerly
direction
into
a
residential
area,
and
in
periods of
heavy
rainfall, cement fines and other
caustic
water,
which
result
from
the
dust
and
concrete
waste
products
located
on
the
property,
can
run
off
the
premises
onto
residential area south of said property,
and
can enter the storm
sewer system of the City of Kankakee, which discharges
into waters
of the State of Illinois,
(b)
That Kankakee Concrete
did, on tlay
4,
1971,
and has
since that date,
caused concrete trucks to be washed out on a
v acarit area of the plant property, and that the wash water
from
said operation has been allowed to drain or evaporate on or from
said plant property.
(c)
That said truck washing operation results in the
depositing of cement fines and caustic water on the property,
and that said cement fines or caustic water could flow from
the property as set
out in sub-paragraph (a) above,
or said cement
fines or caustic water could flow into the paved ditch shown on
Exhibit “C”, which flows
into the Kankakee storm sewer system
and eventually discharges
into the Kankakee River.
(d)
That the depositing of said cement
fines
and cmustic
water upon the Kankakee Concrete premises could create a water
pollution hazard
since said cement fines and caustic water could
—7—
8
—
463
potentially enter the Kankakee River and could cause water
pollution in Illinois, either alone or in combination with matter
or other sources in violation of Section 12
(d) of the Environ-
mental Protection Act.
(e)
That the evaporation of said wash water could also
create dust and add
to the problems set out in paragraph 6 of
this
Stipulation.
18.
That Kankakee Concrete has, prior to the execution of
this Stipulation
,
taken the following steps to
abate
said
water
pollution:
(a)
That Kankakee Concrete has caused the sewer system
from
the
Kiln
building
to
be
connected
to
the
sanitary
sewer
system to the City of Kankakee.
(b)
That Kankakee Concrete has
caused
a concrete retaining
wall to be constructed along the south boundary of the Kankakee
Concrete plant which prevents or substantially prevents any
runoff water or drainage from reaching the property of any other
persons other than Kankakee Concrete,
and has constructed
a
drainage
system and installed drainage pipe so as to collect
any runoff water which reaches the south boundary of said property.
That said
drain discharges into
the paved ditch shown on Exhibit
“C”, which discharges intothe Kankakee storm sewer system.
That
said wall does, however, have an open space or hole in it which could
allow runoff.
(b)
That Kankakee Concrete has continued a land fill project
along
the south portion of their property, which helps prevent
the heavy drainage in that direction,
and
that Kankakee Concrete
has received
a letter from the Environmental Protection Agency
indicating that the refuse
disposal,
which
is being used for the
land fill complies with the state regulations.
That a copy of
said letter is attached hereto as Exhibit “E”.
—8—
8
—
464
19.
That Kankakee Concrete proposes to
take the following
additional steps to abate
the water pollution problems:
(a)
To construct a
truck wash out facility next to the
paved drainage ditch shown on Exhibit “C”, within
120 days of the
date hereof, weather permitting.
That plans for
said wash out
facility
have been prepared
for Kankakee Concrete by Design
Engineering Associates, mechanical engineers from Kankakee,
Illinois,
and
that copies of said plans are attached hereto as Exhibit “F”,
and incorporated herein.
That said truck wash out facility will
collect- all truck wash out water and will allow all cement fines
and other substances to settle and
be collected
in the four bays
shown on Exhibit “p”.
That Design Engineering Associates has
assured Kankakee Concrete that the water, when it leaves bay
~4, will be pure and will be recycled for use again.
(b)
That Kankakee Concrete agrees to immediately apply
for
arty and all necessary permits for the installation for
said
truck wash out facility, and further agrees to construct said truck
wash out facility in accordance with and pursuant to
the necessary
permits.
(c)
That Kankakee Concrete agrees to immediately repair
said cement retaining wall so that no open spaces or holes exist
which could allow runoff water
to flow onto
the property of others
and to keep said retaining wall in proper repair in the future.
20.
That Kankakee Concrete and the Agency believe that
the work which has previously been done by Kankakee Concrete and
the proposed work set out in paragraph 19 above, when completed,
will correct any major sources of water pollution or water pollution
hazard from the Kankakee Concrete plant.
That the parties further
believe that the completion of the
truck wash out facility will
also substantially reduce dust emissions from the Kankakee Concrete
plant.
That it is
impossible to determine at
this time whether
rain water runoff collected in the drainage tile and deposited in
the storm sewer system of the City of Kankakee will contain
materials which could be detrimental to the Kankakee River.
The
parties do believe that the work done and to be done in the
areas
of both air pollution and water pollution abatement will result
in
the
quality
of
any
water
running into the stor~nsewer system
to be of a far better
quality than it has previously been, but
that
a study will have to be conducted to
determine if said
discharges
comply
with
appropriate
standards
and
the
provisions
of the
Environmental
Protection
Act.
21.
That an order should
be entered by the Pollution Control
Board
ordering
Kankakee
Concrete
to
complete
the
work
set
out
in
paragraph 19 above and to apply for any permits necessary for the
installation and construction of said truck wash out faôility.
22.
That
the order of the Pollution Control Board
should
also require a subsequent
study such as that required in
paragraph 13 hereof to be conducted after the above work has
been completed to determine the quality of any water entering
the Kankakee storm sewer system.
23.
That a further order should
be entered by the Pollution
Control Board requiring Kankakee Concrete to post a performance
bond guaranteeing compliance wIth the orders herein provided for
in such amounts and under such terms
and conditions
as the
Pollution Control Board deems just and proper.
24.
That
the Pollution Control Board should enter such
further orders
as they deem to he just and appropriate and the
Pollution
Control
Board
shall
determine on the basis of this
Stipulation and the record in
this
case,
the
amount
of
a
fine,
if
any,
is
to
be
levied by
the
Pollution
Control
Board.
-10—
8
—
466
25.
That Kankakee Concrete represents that it has,
in
the
past,
and
does now desire to solve and correct any pollution
problems attributable to the operation of it’s company,
and has
attempted to cooperate with the Agency and other regulatory
agencies of this state to that end.
That Kankakee Concrete
requests
that
the
Board
consider
the
cost
of
work
which
has
been
previously
done
by
Kankakee
Concrete
and
the
cost
of
the
proposed work in making the determinations which are contemplated
by this Stipulation and which the Pollution Control Board is
required by
law
to
make.
26.
That Kankakee Concrete represents that during the
year 1971,
they expended the sum of $4,930.69 for
costs
in
connection with surface
water control, oiling of the
plant
surfaces, and partial construction of
the
retaining
wall.
That
Kankakee Concrete further reoresents that to date,
in the year
1972,
they have expended the
sum of $12,987.07
for oiling, the
purchase and installation of the Dusty Dustless dust collector
on the ready mix concrete plant, oiling, completion of the
construction of the retaining wall,
surface water control.,
and
purchase and installation of the drainage pipe along the said
retaining wall.
That Kankakee Concrete further represents that
in addition to
the items set out above
that they furnished concrete,
concrete blocks, end other products which they produce of
the
value of $4,589.04 in connection with the construction of the
retaining wall,
27.
That
Konkakee
Concret:e
represents
that
the
estimated
costs
anticipated
for
the
purchase
and
installation
of
the
Dusty
Dustless
dust
collector
on
the cement mixing
plant
is
approximately
$1,000.00
and
that: the estimated
cost
for
the
purchase,
construct:i
on
and
installlat:ion
of
the truck
wash
out
8—467
is
approximately
$19,400.00.
28,
That
the
Environmental
Protection Agency
arid
Kankakee
Concrete Products have agreed to present
the above cause
to the
Pollution Control Board by this Stipulation,
since both parties
agree
that said Stipulation accurately describes the situation
and prescuts to the Board
the pertinent facts and information
involved
in
this
case.
29.
That
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
and
Kankakee
Concrete Products further agree to present th~Stipulation and
have it read into the record at a public hearing held before
a
hearing examiner of the Pollution Control Board and
to then allow
any residents of the
area or other citizens to present testimony
in
accordance
wtth
the rules of the Polluttori Control ~oard.
30.
That the Environmental Protection Agency and Kankakee
Concrete
Products
agree
that
said
public
testimony
together
with
this
Stipulatthn
and
all
ot:her
pleadings
on
file
in
this
cause
shell
constitute
the
record
for presentation to
the
Pollution
Control
Board.
Dated
this
~
day
of
,
1973.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Complainant
By
KAEKAKEE
-~0NCRETE PRODUCTS,
Respondent
By\~--~.
~
‘-y
8—468
EXHIBIT “C”
Pn~r0
LOCA~fl’
‘a.~rc
H
a7rA~H
—
~
~
~
o~-~t~
h~tht~~~
~
U~
~
~
~‘
T~\0
~
0
ftte
t~~t
~
T0(
ft~’~
~
tt~-~.’~
~
pL’~T~~
~JTt~-
~
-
I
~
kc
C:ic~r~
Fp~y1c~5
(\
C
\/
(~
~—
8
—
469
EXhIBIT “D”
~
~
SPECIAL
ANALYSIS
FORM
I
—
~
____
______
.JVOWMrITAL
?:O~
t~C1ICn
AUitlCr
..
WUa~4U
OS
WATER
POLLUTIOn
cOnTWOL~
-
~
sr’~srI
ELE)
ILL
.1
62
0
g
i~~si.n
Rcc’d
by:
~
/~~-~—~//,‘
~
_____
~
~
___
____
_________
L
I
~
~
~
~____
~
~
~
Arsenic
Aluminum
HO~i
-am
__________
Calcium
-____________
Cadmium
_________
Copper
______________
Chromium
(tn)
____________
Chromium
(hex)
__________
Lead
_________
Manganese
Macgoesiou
______
Sodium
Zinc
~
__c
,-I
____________
Coli
form/lOCol
___________
Fecal
Coliform
/100
ml
______________
Fecal
Strep
ml
Hardness
-
Alkalinity
________
Total
Acidity
—
Free
Acidity
~trate
________
Nitrite
____________
Cyanide
MOAS
______
Oil
~LLEc1rD
RYr
TR&s)POPTEO
55 t;
(2)
____________
Turbidity
___________
Chlorine
Aosnonia-N
______________
Or tho- Pho sph a as
~,
~O~lPhos~s:e’
_______
Sulfate
_____________
Chloride
____________
Fluoride
____________
TS/EC-
________
Susp.
Solids
______________
Vol.
Susp.
so1~-~
____________
BUD
t,OO_OI,_~
420.
~3Z,O,*.
~
8
—
470
EIOLIBIT
“5”
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
•
STATE
OF ILLINOIS
William
L.
Elmer,
Director
•
RIchard
8.
OgIlvle~
Governor
September
20,
1912
IN REPLY REFER TO:
LNKAICEE
COUNTY
-
Land Pollution Control
Xankakee/lCankakee Concrete Products
Kankakee Concrete Products
1181 East Resser
lankakee, lllinois
Gentlemen:
A technical representative of this Agency inspected your
rei”~odisposal facility lo:at~’J
it
the above address on
Septo.sber ~2,.l972.
The inspection disclosed that you have satisfactorily closed
and covered
your refuse disposal site.
Your cooperation in this matter
is appreciated.
If thIs Agency can be of assistance to you in the
future, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
ENVIPONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.~
c.
~i:
Sun
?itlance Section
a~ivisionof Land Pollution Control
tSat
.2200 Churchill Ro:,d
a
Sprhip~wld,illinois
62706
a
Telephone:
217.525.33&7
8—4
