ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 4, 2005
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ILLINOIS
INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
COUNTY BOARD OF KANKAKEE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 04-186
(Pollution Control Facility
Siting Appeal)
HEARING REPORT
On April 6 and 7, 2005, a hearing was held in the above-captioned matter at the County
Administration Building, 189 East Court Street, County Board Room, Kankakee, Illinois.
Attorney Donald Moran appeared and participated on behalf of the petitioner. Attorneys’
Charles Helsten, Richard Porter and Assistant State’s Attorney Brenda Gorski appeared and
participated on behalf of the respondent.
Preliminary Matters
On April 5, 2005, a written hearing officer order was entered denying petitioner’s motion
to compel answers to questions it had posed in discovery depositions taken between June 22,
2004 and January 2005. The questions related to reasons why certain members of the respondent
County Board of Kankakee (County Board) had voted against the siting application at issue here.
At a pre-hearing status conference on April 5, 2005, the respondent inquired whether the
petitioner would be allowed to question the certain members of the County Board under an offer
of proof as to the reasons why they voted against the siting application at issue here. On April 6,
2005, the parties orally argued their respective positions regarding the offer of proof matter.
After hearing argument, I ruled that any offer of proof regarding the mental processes of the
County Board members would be disallowed.
On April 4, 2005, the respondent filed
a motion in limine
to bar the petitioner from
attempting to elicit statements regarding County Board member Ann Bernard’s failed attempt to
retain a seat on the Illinois state legislature. After hearing arguments, I granted the respondent’s
motion in limine
, but allowed the petitioner to elicit such statements under an offer of proof.
Witness Credibility
2
Based upon my legal judgment, experience and observations at the hearing, I find that the
credibility of the witnesses is not an issue in this matter.
Exhibits
A list itemizing the exhibits and their status is attached to this order.
Briefing Schedule
A briefing schedule in light of the then statutory decision due date was discussed and
agreed to at the hearing. However, the petitioner represented on April 28, 2005, that it will
extend the statutory decision deadline by filing a waiver decision deadline to and including July
21, 2005. To that end, the post-hearing briefing schedule has been modified as follows: the
petitioner’s opening post-hearing brief must be served and filed on or before May 13, 2005. The
mailbox rule does not apply. The respondent’s post-hearing brief must be served and filed on or
before June 3, 2005. The mailbox rule does not apply. Petitioner’s reply, if any, must be served
and filed on or before June 17, 2005. The mailbox rule does not apply. Public comment is due to
be filed on or before May 20, 2005. Michael Watson, Merlin Karlock and Keith Runyon’s
amicus curiae
brief is due to be filed on or before May 20, 2005.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________
Bradley P. Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center, Suite 11-500
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601
312.814.8917
3
PCB 04-186
April 6 and 7, 2005 Hearing
Exhibit List
Exhibit Description Status
Hearing Officer Exhibit 1 Trial Brief of respondent regarding offer of
proof
Taken with
the case
Hearing Officer Exhibit 2 Evidence Deposition of Lisa Latham Admitted
Hearing Officer Exhibit 3 Evidence Deposition of Douglas Graves Admitted
Hearing officer Exhibit 4 Discovery Deposition of Pamela Lee Admitted
Hearing Officer Exhibit 5 Evidence Deposition of Duane Bertrand Admitted
Hearing Officer Exhibit 6 Evidence Deposition of William Olthoff Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 1 Letter dated February 19, 2004, from
Tammy Focken
Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 2 Letter dated February 18, 2004, from
Karon Mallaney
Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 3 Undated letter from Linda Olson Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 4 IVI – IPO 2004 General Assembly
Questionnaire re: Ann Bernard
Taken as
offer of proof
Petitioner’s Exhibit 5 Newspaper article dated March 10, 2004 Taken as
offer of proof
Petitioner’s Exhibit 6 Ann Bernard’s website article Taken as
offer of proof
Petitioner’s Exhibit 7 Roll Call and Votes dated, January 31,
2003
Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 8 Roll Call and Votes dated, March 17, 2004 Admitted
Petitioner’s Exhibit 9 Roll Call and Votes, dated April 13, 2004 Taken as
offer of proof