ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
22, 1984
CITY OF WYOMING,
Petitioner,
V.
 )
 PCB 84—17
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
 (by J.
 Marlin):
This matter comes before the Board upon the filing on
February
 9,
 1984 of
 a petition for variance from 35
 Ill. Adm.
Code 309.241
by the City of
Wyoming
 (City).
 The
City has
been on
restricted status
 since
May 26, 1971 and requests
relief
to enable it
to
connect approximately 65
remaining
homes of the
first
ward to the sanitary
sewer
system.
 In
response
to a Board more
information Order
dated February 22,
1984,
 the
City filed an amended petition on April
 5,
 1984.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
 filed
an
initial recommendation to deny variance on May 14,
 1984.
The
City submitted additional information to the Agency on
 May 29,
1984.
 In its amended recommendation of June 11,
1984
the
Agency suggested granting
the
variance subject to condi-
tions.
 Two objections were received from
concerned
citizens
and a public hearing was held in
Wyoming,
 Illinois on
June
 13,
1984.
The City of Wyoming has a population of
 1614 residents.
The City~swastewater treatment plant
 (WWTP) has a design
a~rerageflow of 0.2 MGD and a 1983 average daily flow of 0.27
MCD.
 Peak wet weather flow is 0.566
 MGD,
Previously the City was granted variance to allow extension
of
 sanitary sewer service to the first ward and connection of
a limited number of homes to the sanitary sewer
system
(30 PCB
LI, April
 13,
1978, PCB 77~252). During l980—8~
the City
up-
graded the sewer lines with an Agency construction grant.
 Both
the peak flow rate and the total volume of storm water to the
sanitary sewers were reduced.
Currently the WWTP is being upgraded and a trunkmain
seg-
ment is being replaced pursuant to a $1,831,990 grant from
the
USEPA through the Agency (Amend. Pet,, Attach.
 B).
 The WWTP
will include tertiary filtration
and aerobic sludge treatment.
59~409
2
Another grant project is being financed by the U.S~Department
of Housing and Urban Development
 (MUD) through the Illinois
Department of Commerce and Comm~
 ~
 Affairs
 (DCCA).
 This $390,000
grant provides for the connection of 65 residences to
the City~s
sanitary sewer system (Amend. Pet., Attach.
 B).
 The City~s
share of the project is $727,663 which was financed by general
obligation and revenue bonds.!’
 The grant application was submitted
on May
 2, 1983 and approved on August 15, 1983 by DCCA.
 The
grant expires
 on August 31,
 1984
 (Amend,
 Pet.,
 Attach.
 B,
 C,
D)
 but a grant extension may be possible
 (Agency Rec. at 6).
The City requests a variance so it may connect the remaining
65 resid.ences of the first ward to the sanitary sewer system.
The connecticns will add 228 population equivalents or 22,800
gallons per day (0.0228 MCD) to
the WWTP (Amend.
 Pet. at 3).
Currently these
residences
in the northern part of the City
use individual septic systems.
 The Illinois Department of Public
Health has determined that a health hazard
exists
because of
sewage discharges to storm sewers and open ditches
 (Amend. Pet.,
Attach.
 F).
Residences to the south
of those waiting
 to be connected
are
 experiencing basement back—ups during
 high
 wet weather
 flow.
The
 Board notes that this also
 is
 a health hazard.
 The 15 inch
diameter trunkmain segment from the WWTP to manhole
 #4
 is inadequate
f
or
 the
 flow and limits the transport capacity of the trunkmain.
Basement back~upsoriginate from approximately manhole
 #4
 and
move
 north
 along
 the
 trunkmain.
 A 24 inch diameter segment
is to replace
the
 15
 inch diameter segment and thus relieve
and hopefully eliminate the back~upproblems.
 Transport capacity
is also limited between manhole
 #15 and #l6A but may not contribute
to basement back-ups.
 If
back~upspersist after the trunkmain
replacement
 between the WWTP and manhole
 #4,
 this second drea
will have to be corrected.
Petitioner must show that compliance with the Board~srules
and regulations would impose an arbitrary or unLeasonable hardship.
Ill. Rev. Sta~,1983,
 ch. 111½, par.
 1035.
 The City asserts
that it would lose the $390,000 in grant money from DCCA and
that it would have to construct the sewers at its own expense
if the variance were denied. However,
 it appears that an extension
of the grant period could be obtained (Agency Rec. at 6).
 Even
if the extension was denied and the grant project not completed
on time,
 the loss of grant money would be limited to the cost
of design
 (Agency Rec, at
 3
).
The City has been on restricted status since 1971.
 All
liabilities have accrued subsequent to imposition of restricted
status.
 To the extent there
 is
 any economic hardship, it is
1/
 The grant application provides that the City~sshare
is $727,663
 (Attach,
 B) while DCCA~sletter provides the figure
of $727,633
 (Attach. H—I).
59~410
3
self—imposed.
 However, completion of the total program could
provide a solution to a problem that has plagued the City for
over a decade, thereby eliminating one health hazard and greatly
 reducing another.
 The Board does not agree with the City~s
statement that “the positive aspect of relieving the first ward
residents of
 a health hazard greatly offset the few basement
backups”
 (Amend.
 Pet. at 4).
 The residents experiencing basement
back-ups should not be forced to bear increased back—ups due
to the 65 connections.
 The sewer connections should eliminate
the health hazard associated with septic systems while the trunkmain
upgrading should greatly reduce the health hazard of basement
hack-ups
 (Agency Amend.
 Rec. at
 3).
 To ensure that basement
back—ups are not worsened, the Board will impose as a condition
of the variance that the trunkmain upgrading is in fact accomplished
before any connections are allowed.
 Presently the trunkmain
is scheduled for completion in December,
 1984.
 The City may
be able to move that date
 up.
 By using this approach there
should be little additional adverse environmental impact.
 A
further condition will require the City to study whether basement
back-ups continue after the trunkmain upgrading and take steps
to
 eliminate them.
Furthermore, the Board is aware that simple, inexpensive
water conservation practices and devices can be of great use
to
 cities with sewer and WWTP problems.
 Reducing residential
and commercial water consumption can significantly reduce pres-
 sure
 on
 treatment plants.
 While in this case the Board
 will
not order the installation of water conservation measures, the
City will be required to obtain free information on the subject
for
 its officials.
 Any decision to promote, encourage,
 or
require
 such devices will be left to the City.
Any economic hardship in this case is clearly self—imposed.
However,
 the hardship situation resulting from the septic systems
and
 basement back-ups poses a threat
 to
 the public health and
welfare.
 These problems can be corrected or improved by sewer
connections and trunkmain expansion.
 The Board holds that the
denial
 of the variance, which would delay this project until
the WWTP is
 removed from restricted
 status, would impose an
arbitrary or
 unreasonable
 hardship
 on the
 City
 of Wyoming.
The City of Wyo~ingis granted a variance from 35
 Ill.
Adm. Code
 309.241 subject to the conditions below.
This
 Opinion constitutes the Board~sfindings of fact
 and
conclusions of
 law in this matter.
59~41i
4
The City of Wyoming,
 Illinois is hereby granted a variance
until July 1,
 1987 from 35
 111. Adm. Code 309.241 subject to
the following conditions:
1.
 The
 15 inch diameter trunkmain segment shall be replaced
by a 24 inch diameter trunkmain segment between the wastewater
treatment plant and manhole #4 before any connections to the
sanitary sewer system are allowed,
2.
 No more than 70 homes shall be connected to the sanitary
sewer extension until the WWTP is removed from restricted
 status,
3.
 Petitioner shall, by July 1,
 1985, perform a study
to determine whether basement back—ups caused by sewer
surcharging have continued beyond the completion date of the
trunkmain upgrading and,
 if
 so, describe the measures to be
taken to eliminate those basement back-ups.
 Measures to be
considered include,
 but are not limited to,
 installation of
water saving devices, control
 of
 infiltration/inflow,
 and construction
of relief
 sewers.
 A copy
 of
 this report shall be provided on
or before July
 10,
 1985 to the following:
 Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, Division
 of
 Water Pollution Control, 2200
 Churchill Road, Springfield,
 Illinois
 62706.
4.
 The City shall provide information on water conservation
to each elected city official, to appointed department heads, to
the officials in charge of the wastewater treatment plant and
water treatment
 plant and to the local media outlets,
 Free
~Water Conservation Packets~may be obtained from:
 Mark Enstrom,
Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, 630
 E.
Adams,
 5th Floor,
 Springfield,
 IL
 62701;
 (217) 785—6158.
5.
 Petitioner
 shall complete any and all measures deemed
necessary to eliminate basement back-ups caused by sewer surcharging,
based upon its study,
 on
 or before July 1,
 1987, at which ~time
this variance expires.
6.
 vjithin forty-five days of the date of this Order,
Petitioner shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, Compliance
 Assurance Unit, Water Pollution
Control Division, 2200 Churchill Road,
 Springfield, Illinois
62706,
 a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement to he bound
to all terms and conditions of this variance,
 This forty—five
day period shall
 be
 held in abeyance for any period during which
this matter is being appealed.
 The
 form
 of the certificate
shall be as follows:
59~412
5
CERTIFICATE
I,
 (We)
 __________
 ,
 having read the
Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 84-17,
dated
 ______
 ,
 understand and accept the said Order,
realizing that such acceptance renders
 all terms and conditions
thereto binding and enforceable.
By:
 Authorized
Agent
Date
Title
IT IS
SO ORDERED.
I,
 Dorothy
M.
 Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, here~1certify
that the
 hove Opinion and order was adopted
on the
~
 day of
 ___,
 1984 by a vote of
____________
b~~Ehy~M7~inn,
 Clerk
Illinois pollution Control Board
59~413