ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February
    17, 1982
    OAK GROVE MOBILE HOME
    PARK,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 81—148
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    and VILLAGE OF
    MILAN,
    )
    Respondents.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J.
    Anderson):
    This matter comes before the Board on the petition for
    variance filed by the Oak Grove Mobile Home Park (Oak Grove)
    September
    28, 1981 as amended November
    19,
    1981.
    Oak Grove
    seeks
    variance from the Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution effluent limitations
    of Rules 203(f)
    as it relates to ammonia nitrogen,
    Rules 404(a—c)
    as they relate to BOD5 and TSS, and Rule 405 as
    it relates to
    fecal
    coliform.
    As one compliance option would involve transport
    of Oak Grove’s effluent for treatment at a sewage treatment plant
    owned and operated by the Village of Milan, the Village was joined
    as a respondent by Board Order of December 3,
    1981.
    The Village
    has voiced no agreement with or opposition to this petition.
    The January
    7, 1982 Recommendation of the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    is that variance be
    granted in part and denied in part.
    The Agency notes in regard
    to the requested ammonia nitrogen variance, that variance from
    the water quality standards of Rules 402 and 402.1 would also be
    necessary to allow for Agency modification of Oak Grove’s NPDES
    permit.
    The Board will accordingly construe this petition as
    seeking this additional
    relief.
    Hearing was waived and none has
    been held.
    The Oak Grove Mobile Home Park
    is located approximately two
    miles
    south of the Village of Milan,
    Rock Island County.
    Its 55
    mobile home units are served by a collection system and sewage
    treatment plant which have been in operation since the early
    1950’s.
    The treatment plant consists of three septic tanks
    in
    series,
    followed by a 1400 gallon dosing tank and intermittent
    sand filters.
    Effluent
    is discharged into an unnamed intermittent
    creek tributary first
    to Mill Creek, then the Rock River, then the
    Mississippi.
    Oak Grove seeks variance until the expiration of its
    current NPDES permit on May 31,
    1986 to allow it to discharge
    45—425

    2
    effluent containing 60 mg/i of each BOD5 and TSS (the effluent
    standard being 10/12),
    20 mg/i ammonia nitrogen (the effluent
    standard being 1.5 mg/i),
    and unlimited amounts of fecal coliform
    (the effluent standard being 400/100 ml).
    In six selected months
    between July,
    1980 and May, 1981, Daily Monitoring Reports
    (DMR’s)
    indicated BOD5 loadings ranging from 18 to 96 mg/i, TSS from 22
    to 102 mg/i, ammonia nitrogen from 7.09 to 7.56 mg/i,
    and fecal
    coliform from 1600 to 1,270,000 per 100 mg/i.
    Total plant rehabilitation,
    as estimated by Beling
    Consultants,
    Inc., would require an initial outlay of $33,700,
    with annual expenses of $15,200.
    Oak Grove
    is loathe to embark
    on such a project for two reasons.
    First,
    monthly user charges
    of $23 per month would be required (the petition’s silence would
    indicate that there are currently none).
    More importantly,
    such
    expense could be obviated by Oak Grove’s connection to the Milan
    sewer system and treatment plant.
    The Agency notes that the Milan plant currently has the
    capacity to treat Oak Grove’s effluent.
    The Village is currently
    in Step
    1 of the construction grant program, and
    is expected,
    according
    to Agency grant personnel, to have completed a facility
    plan in a year.
    The Village has, however,
    also applied for a
    Step
    1 grant amendment to allow
    it to conduct a Sewer System
    Evaluation Survey.
    Oak Grove states that
    it cannot estimate the
    costs of connection until the plan is complete, although the
    Agency believes such estimates can be made,
    and can be completed
    within six months.
    As an interim measure,
    Oak Grove proposes to make certain
    renovations and improvements to its system, particularly the sand
    filter area.
    These interim measures would involve outlays
    initially of $13,800 and then annually of $6,600,
    resulting in
    imposition of
    a $10 monthly user charge.
    The Agency concludes that some relaxation of the Board’s
    regulations would he both environmentally acceptable and consistent
    with the Clean Water Act, but not to the levels requested.
    It
    believes that with improved operation and maintenance BOT)
    and TSS
    limitations of 30/30 could be achieved.
    As Oak Grove’s a~monia
    nitrogen levels have not exceeded 7.58 mg/l,
    the Agency suggests
    an interim limit of 8.0 mg/i
    to prevent “backsliding” and possible
    toxic effects to fish by discharge at the requested 20.0 mg/i
    level.
    The Agency recommends that the fecal coliform limit be
    eliminated.
    In support it cites the pendency of R77—12, Docket
    r) remarking that Oak Grove would be exempt from the limitation
    if the rules are adopted as proposed.
    Finally, the Agency
    proposes that variance, with conditions,
    expire in six months by
    which time costs of connection to the Milan system should have
    been completed.
    The Board finds that denial of variance would impose an
    arbitrary or unreasonable hardship.
    Oak Grove is within the Milan
    Facility Planning Area.
    Given the preference,
    for environmental
    45—426

    and other reasons, for regional sewage treatment over individual
    treatment plants,
    for the Board to require complete plant
    rehabilitation at this time would not be in the best interests
    of all concerned.
    Variance will be granted to include effluent
    limitations as recommended by the Agency.
    While the fecal
    coliform limit will be waived entirely, this does not reflect
    a
    pre-judgement of the outcome of R77—12,
    Docket D.
    Rather,
    it
    reflects the Board’s determination that the capital outlay
    required for installation of disinfection equipment can reasonably
    be deferred for the short term of this variance, during which the
    regulatory proceeding should have been completed.
    The Board believes that the suggested six-month term for
    variance
    is too short,
    while Oak Grove’s
    4 year proposal
    is too
    long.
    Proper evaluation of the costs and feasibility of con-
    nection to the Milan plant may well be dependent upon information
    generated during the next year
    in the course of the Village’s
    SSES and facility planning.
    However, four years
    is too long for
    Oak Grove to defer ultimate compliance planning.
    Variance with
    conditions
    is therefore granted for one year.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of the law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    1.
    Petitioner, the Oak Grove Mobile Home Park,
    is granted
    variance from Rule 203(f),
    402, 402.1 and 404(a,c)
    of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution, until February 17,
    1983 subject to the following
    conditions:
    A)
    The following effluent limitations shall be met:
    BOD5 and TSS
    --
    30/30 as
    a monthly average,
    and ammonia
    nitrogen
    ——
    8.0 mg/i.
    B)
    Oak Grove
    shall, after receipt of all necessary
    permits,
    i)
    Remove the sludge from its existing septic
    tank system at
    least three times a year.
    ii)
    Replace the duplex siphons to permit
    alternate dosing of each sand filter.
    iii)
    Maintain and improve the existing sand filter
    area by
    a)
    replacing the sand to a depth of
    2 feet with
    washed filter sand, effective size
    .25 to 1.0 mm with a
    uniformity coefficient not greater than 3.5,
    b)
    replacing
    filter cell walls,
    c) refurbishing inlet distribution
    system to each filter.
    C)
    On or before February
    1,
    1983, Oak Grove shall
    submit to the Agency a report on the feasibility and costs
    of connection to the Village of Milan sewer system.
    45—427

    4
    2.
    Within forty—five days of the date of this Order,
    Petitioner shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency,
    Enforcement Programs,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706,
    a Certificate of Acceptance and
    Agreement to be bound to all terms and conditions of this variance.
    This forty-five day period shall be held in abeyance for any
    period this matter is being appealed.
    The form of the certificate
    shall
    be as follows:
    CERTIFICATE
    I,
    (We),
    ,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 81-148,
    dated ___________________________________, understand and accept the
    said Order, realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    3.
    The Agency
    is authorized to modify Oak Grove’s NPDES
    permit consistent with the terms
    of this Order.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    hereby, certify that the above Opinion and Order was
    adopted on the J~’~ayof __________________________,
    1982 by
    a vote of
    y-~
    .
    7
    Christan L.
    Mof ett, CXe±k
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    45—428

    Back to top