ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March
3,
1977
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
WILFORD
E.
(“ERNIE”) JOHNSON
)
and NORMA
I. JOHNSON, d/b/a
BYRON SALVAGE,
)
)
Respondents;
)
)
PCB 74—471
)
PCB 76—210
WILFORD ERNEST JOHNSON,
)
(CONSOLIDATED)
and NORMA
I.
JOHNSON,
)
Complainants,
v.
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Zeitlin):
On February
8,
1977,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency),
as Respondent
in cause PCB 76—210,
filed a Motion to Strike with
regard to that case.
(PCB 76—210 was consolidated on the Board’s
motion with PCB 74-471 in an Interim Order entered September
30,
1976.)
The Agency’s motion shows that,
in Objections to Interrogatories
filed by Complainants in PCB 76—210,
“This cause does not charge the
Respondent with depositing contaminants...”
(Emphasis in original.)
The met
i
on
~~k~
tihi
t: on
Lhc’ basis of Lhd I.
)
I (~d(1
iI~J
,
t
II(’
~‘l
11
e(ju
t
ion in
the
Complaint
in
PCB
76—210
with regard to violation of Section 12(d)
of
the
Envii~onmenta1 Protection
Act
(Act)
be stricken.
No
response
to
the
Agency’s Motion to Strike has been received.
Based
on
Complainant’s pleadings in PCB
76—210,
the Board agrees
that
no
allegation
of
violation
of
Section
12(d)
of
the
Act
is
alleged,
and that any such allegation in the Complaint must be stricken.
The
Board also notes, however,
that violation of Section 12(d)
of the
Act
is the only alleged violation in the Complaint in PCB 76-210.
We
shall,
therefore, sever PCB 76—210 and dismiss it entirely.
The Hearing Officer is directed to proceed expeditiously toward
completion of the record in PCB 74-471.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
—
7
—2—
Mr.
James
Young
abstained.
I,
Christan
L.
Moffett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control Board, hereby ce;tify the
above Order was adppted on
the
_____
day of
cr’~,teJ~
,
1977, by a vote of
4/..~
Christan L. Moffet
Illinois Pollution Control Board
25—8