ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    February 17,
    1982
    OLIN CORPORATION
    )
    (EAST ALTON),
    )
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 80—126
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    CONCURRING OPINION
    (by
    I.
    Goodman):
    Although
    I am in general agreement with the Opinion and
    Order of the Board issued today
    in this matter,
    I am fearful
    that the Board’s Opinion may be misconstrued to require the
    Agency to prepare a statement of the basis
    for each and every
    permit condition no matter how obvious and mundane.
    Conditions
    which will have,
    as stated in Rule 905(b)(3)
    of Chapter
    3,
    “a significant impact upon the discharge”
    should obviously be
    addressed.
    The Board today has liberalized the meaning of that
    rule to a point where it might well say a significant impact
    upon the discharger.
    I do not believe, however, that it is
    the Board’s intention to expand the requirement to any and all
    conditions proposed by the Agency in the permit.
    Common sense,
    on the part of both parties, should result
    in sufficient com-
    munication to alleviate the problem as addresaed.~.4x~this case.
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, her~bycertif
    that ~theabove Concurring Opinion was submitted
    on the
    11
    ~
    day ofX~~~4.A~
    -,
    1982.
    Christan L. M’o~L~tt,Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    45—395

    Back to top