ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January
7,
1982
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 81~97
CEZAR~SINN,
INC.,
an Illinois corporation,
)
Respondent,
GERHARDT BRAECKEL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF
THE COMPLAINANT.
ELMORE, GOWEN
& DeMICHAEL,
P.C., ATTORNEYS AT LAW
(MR. ELBERT F.
ELMORE,
OF
COUNSEL), APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by N,E,Werner):
This matter comes before
the
Board on the June
10,
1981 Complaint
brought by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (‘~Agency”).
Count
I of the Complaint alleged that, on numerous occasions
between July
2,
1979 and
June 10,
1981, the
Respondent allowed the
parking of trucks on
its property to cause noise
pollution
in
violation of Rule 102 of Chapter 8:
Noise Regulations
(“Chapter
8”)
and Section 24 of the
Illinois Environmental Protection
Act
(“Act”).
Count II alleged that,
from July
2,
1979 until
June 10, 1981
(including,
but not limited to, March 27,
1980, September
5,
1980, and
March
5,
1981), the
Respondent allowed the emission
of sound during
daytime hours from a
property—line~noise—source on its property
(Class
~)
to receiving Class
A
land which exceeded
the allowable
octave
band sound pressure levels in violation of Rules 102
and 202
of Chapter
8 and
Section 24 of the Act.
A hearing was held on
October 20, 1981 at
which a partially signed
Statement of Stipulated Settlement
(i.e.,
signed only by counsel for
the Respondent), which was
substantially
identical to the subsequently
filed Stipulation, was
incorporated into the
hearing record,
(R.
2—3;
R.
14—16),
Two members of the public testified at this hearing.
The
parties filed a properly signed Statement of Stipulated Settlement on
October 30,
1981.
The Respondent, Cezar’s Inn,
Inc.
(“Cezar”),
owns and operates a
motel which is
located at 5001 West 79th Street
in the City of Burbank,
45—39
—2—
Cook County,
Illinois,
On March
27,
1980,
September 5,
1980, and
March
5,
1981, Agency employees conducted sound tests which
indicated
that noise
levels violated allowable standards and could
disturb
persons utilizing adjacent residential property.
(Stip.
2—3).
Noises have been produced by the operation and parking of
trucks,
tractors and trailers (including the starting and warming—up of
engines, the running of refrigeration units, etc.) on the southeast
side of the Respondent’s parking
lot.
(Stip.
3),
Customers
of the
motel, as well as non—customers and local residents, have utilized
Cezar’s parking lot and frequently disturbed the sleep,
relaxation,
and enjoyment of life of the people
in the two homes closest to the
southeast side of the parking lot.
(Stip,
3
),
Although the
Respondent “instituted a policy of prohibiting unattended
running of
engines and running of refrigeration units while parked in the
winter
of 1979 and posted signs to that effect”, these measures were not
totally effective in eliminating all noise problems.
(Stip.
4).
At the hearing,
Mr. Daniel Higgins and Mrs. Kathy Higgins
testified pertaining
to the disturbing noises from tractors, trailers,
and trucks which parked along the side of their house in the
Respondent’s parking
lot.
(R, 4—16~~Mr. Higgins indicated that
now, since the trucks will be parking in a different area of
the lot
(away from the Higgins’ house), the “underlying problem has
been
alleviated”.
(R.
4).
Mrs. Kathy Higgins expressed concern
that
sometimes the
trucks may
fail to park in the newly
designated areas
and worried that, when the snows came, the truck drivers
might not
see
the
markings.
(R.
8—9),
However,
in regard to the
Stipulation
itself,
Mrs.
Higgins testified that “I agree with everything
if it’s
going to stay the way
it is”.
(R,
8).
To alleviate any future noise problems, the proposed settlement
agreement provides that the Respondent shall:
(1) direct all trucks,
tractors and trailers to face north and to park only in the spaces
designated for truck parking
(“an appropriate symbol such as
a
will be painted on the surface of the parking lot to identify the
designated space”);
(2) use “all reasonable means” to prevent “the
running of truck or tractor engines while unattended or
refrigeration
units
(reefers)
on its property”;
(3) post,
near the present signs,
an equal number of signs which shall read:
“Trucks or Trailers
Parked in This Area Will Be Towed At Owner~sExpense.
Park Only
in
Designated Area,”;
(4)
post an appropriate sign at the motel’s
reception desk to notify truckers who are motel guests regarding
the
parking lot rules and about the designated spaces;
(5) inform
truckers
(who are not motel guests)
about the parking lot rules and
designated
spaces,
“or prohibit their parking on the property”;
(6)
take all
necessary measures “to assure that the parking lot rules are
complied
with”
(including, but not limited to, instructing all desk
clerks to
inform the truck drivers of the rules;
informing all motel
employees
of these
rules;
“periodic checking of the parking lot to
make sure the
parking rules are followed” and “enforcement of the parking
lot
rules
when
informed of violations”),
(Stip.
5—6).
45~4o
—3
In evaluating this enforcement
action and
proposed settlement
agreement,
the Board has taken into consideration all the facts and
circumstances in light of the specific criteria delineated in
Section 33(c) of the Act.
The Board finds the settlement
agreement
acceptable under Procedural
Rule 331 and Section
33(c)
of the Act.
Accordingly, the Board
finds that the
Respondent, Cezar’s Inn,
Inc.,
has violated Rules
102 and 202
of Chapter
8:
Noise Regulations
and
Section 24 of the Illinois
Environmental
Protection Act.
The Respondent
will be ordered to follow the
compliance program set
forth in the
settlement agreement and no
penalty will be imposed in this case.
This Opinion constitutes the
Board’s findings
of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board that:
1,
The Respondent,
Cezar’s Inn,
Inc., has violated Rules
102
and 202 of Chapter
8:
Noise Regulations and Section 24 of the
Illinois
Environmental Protection Act,
2.
No monetary
penalty shall be assessed against the
Respondent.
3.
The Respondent shall
comply with all the terms
and conditions
of the Statement of Stipulated
Settlement filed on
October 30,
1981,
which is incorporated by
reference as
if fully set
forth herein,
I, Christan
L, Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control
Board, her~pycertify
t at the above Opinion and Order were
adopted
on the
7
‘
~ay of
~
1982 by a vote of
‘V-c
45~-41