ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December
1,
1983
INDUSTRIAL SALVAGE,
It!.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
V.
)
PCB 83—173
)
COUNTY
BOARD
OF
MARION
COUNTY,
)
)
Respondent.
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
7. Anderson):
This appeal was filed November 21, 1983 pursuant to SB 172,
P.A.
82—682.
Industrial Salvage, Inc.
(Industrial) is appealing
the November 8,
1983 decision of the County Board of Marion County
denying its site location suitability approval for a new regional
pollution control facility.
As Industrial inadvertently failed to
include a copy of the County’s decision, the Board has no details
on the proposed facility.
Industrials’s request for an order making the County a
respondent is denied as unnecessary, as the County has been
made a respondent by statute.
The request that the County be
ordered
to
answer
the
petition
is
also
denied.
Board
practice
in
the
analogous
area
of
Agency
permit
denial
appeals
is
not
to
require
an
answer,
relying
instead
on
the
respondent
party’s
final briefing of the matter.
SB 172,
as codified in Section 40.1(a) of the Act, provides
that the hearing before the Board is to ‘be based exclusively on
the record before the county board.’
The statute does not specify
y~ is to file with the Board
the
record
before
the County or who
is to certify to the completeness or correctness of the record.
As the Marion County Board alone can verify
and
certify
what
exactly
is
the
entire
record
before
it,
in
the
interest
of
protecting the rights of all parties to this action, and in order
to satisfy the intention of SB 172, the Board believes that the
County must
be
the
party
to
prepare
and
file
the
record
on
appeal.
The
Board
suggests
that
guidance
in
so
doing
can
be
had
by
reference
to
Section
105.102(a)(4)
of
the Board’s Procedural Rules
and to Rules 321 through 324 of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.
In addition to the actual documents which comprise the record,
the
County
Clerk
shall
also
prepare
a
document
entitled
‘Certificate
of
Record
on
Appeal’
which
shall
list
the
documents
comprising the record.
Three copies of the certificate and
three
of
the
record
shall
be
filed
with
the
Board,
and
a
copy
of the
55-21
—2—
certificate shall be served upon the petitioner.
As these
requirements have not previously been applied to the County of
Marion,
its Clerk is given 21 days from the date of this Order
to “prepare, bind and certify the record on appeal”
(Ill.
Supreme
Court,
Rule 324).
Section 40.1(b) provides that the petition shall be heard
“in accordance with the terms of” Section 40.1(a).
Section
40.1(a) provides that
if there is no final action by the Board
within
90
days, petitioner may deem the site location approved.
The Board has construed identical “in accordance with the
terms of”
language contained
in Section 40(b)
of the Act
concerning third—party appeals of the grant of hazardous waste
landfill permits as giving the respondent who had received the
permit
a) the right to a decision within 90 days,
and b) the
right to waive
(extend)
the decision period
(Alliance for
a Safe
Environment, et al._v.
Akron Land Corp.
et al., PCB 80—184,
October 30,
1980).
The Board therefore construes Section 40.1(b)
in like manner, with the result that failure of the Board to act
in 90 days would allow respondent to deem the site location
approved.
Pursuant to Section 105.104 of the Procedural
Rules,
it is each petitioner’s responsibility to pursue its action, to
insist that a hearing on its petition is timely scheduled, and
to insure that a transcript of the hearing
is timely
filed with
the Board in order
to allow the Board to review the record and to
render
its decision within 90 days of the filing of the petition.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control B2ard, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted
on the
~
day of ~O.4-L--\~
,
1983 by a vote of
7—~
Christan L.
Moffe 1~(J~lerk
Illinois Pollution ‘Control Board
55-22