ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February
    6, 1975
    IN
    THE
    MATTER
    OF
    DUPAGE
    COUNTY
    WASTEWATER
    REGIONALIZATION
    -
    )
    R70-17
    PETITION
    FOR
    MODIFICATION
    OR
    REHEARING OF BOARD ORDER
    PROPOSED OPINION AND
    ORDER
    -
    SUBJECT TO PUBLIC COMMENT
    On October
    3,
    1974 Kenroy Builders,
    Inc.
    (Kenroy)
    filed
    a Petition for Modification or Rehearing of Board Order.
    The petition seeks to change the boundary between Regions I
    and IV within DuPage County designated by the Board’s Order
    of August 29, 1974 in R70—17 Du Page County Wastewater Regional!-
    zation.
    On November 22, 1974 the Board issued an Order which
    found the Kenroy petition to comply with Board Procedural
    Rule 334 which allows motions for modification within 35
    days of the date of entry of the Board~sfinal order.
    The
    Board order also asked various entities to submit comments
    concerning the Kenroy petition to the Board within 60 days
    of the date of the Order.
    Responses to the November 22, 1974 Order were received
    by the Board from the Village of Bloomingdal.e, the Northeastern
    Illinois Planning Commission
    (NIPC),
    the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency), the Village of Addison, and the
    Medinah Lakes Home Owners Association. Generally speaking,
    the Addison and IEPA responses support Kenroy’s petition
    while Bloomingdale and the Medinah Home Owners oppose it,
    NIPC being in between.
    In 1970 Kenroy and Addison signed
    a “recapture” agreement,
    exhibit A to the Petition for Modification,
    regarding the
    construction of
    a sanitary sewer to serve Kenroy property in
    the vicinity of Army Trail Road and proposed highway F.A.
    61.
    Kenroy agreed to construct an oversized sewer to provide
    available sewer capacity to property other than that owned
    by Kenroy,
    in exchange for which, Addison would collect
    connection fees from persons desiring to connect to the
    sewer in the future
    an.d remit them to Kenroy.
    The cost of

    the sewer system to Kenroy, completed in July,
    1973, was
    $782,000, of which $240,000 was the cost to serve Kenroy~s
    own property as outlined in paragraph 12 of the Recapture
    Agreement.
    Kenroy therefore expects to recapture approximately
    $540,000 from connection fees for hookups to the sewers
    The recapture area, including the portion that
    is
    Kenroy’s property,
    is shown in exhibit
    3 of the Kenroy
    petition. Roughly speaking, the recapture area is on the
    north and west sides of Addison and is mostly unannexed.
    The sewer
    extension
    built by Kenroy
    is
    shown on a drawing
    prepared by Ciorba,
    Spies, Gustafson and Company, entitled
    General Location, also included with the petition.
    The
    western boundary of Region I, described in paragraph a.l of
    the
    DuPage County Wastewater Regionalization Plan,
    and shown
    on exhibit
    3, splits the recapture area so that a portion of
    it is outside of Region I and thus outside the jurisdiction
    of Addison,
    In particular the portion outside is under the
    jurisdiction of the northern subregion of Region IV, composed
    of Glendale Heights, Bloomingdale and Roselle, and it is
    this outside portion of the recapture area that is the
    subject of this proceeding.
    Kenroy argues, applying paragraph a.3 of the DuPage
    plan,
    that connections
    to the sewer from within the recapture
    area but outside Region
    I
    (the subject area)
    cannot be made
    without the consent of Region IV who therefore has veto
    power over Kenroy’s ability to recapture monies pursuant to
    the Recapture Agreement.
    We agree with the Kenroy interpre-
    tation of paragraph a,3.
    Addison supports the petition, saying that the sewer
    was sized to provide future sewer service to the recapture
    area,
    that the boundary as proposed is in line with an
    ~existing boundary agreement with Glendale Heights
    (exhibit B
    of Kenroy’s petition), and that the sewer extension was
    designated prior to the time the Board conceived regionaliza-
    tion.
    Both Bloomingdale and the Medinah Home Owners oppose
    any boundary change.
    The reasons for the Medinah opposition
    are that they don’t need the service and that the change is
    “not practical or beneficial” to them.
    At present these
    people are within Region IV;
    the boundary change would put
    them partially in Region IV and partially in Region I.
    In
    terms of sewage service, the homeowners now have septic tank
    systems and thus don’t want to pay a connection fee to
    Addison in the future,
    In addition the homeowners are
    trying to avoid annexation to Addison,
    15—418

    Bloorningdale states that Kenroy has not shown that it
    (Kenroy) can service the area more economically than Bloomingdale,
    that Kenroy is only concerned with recovering the costs of
    the sewer that it has constructed, that there is no guarantee
    that the sewer is sized large enough to provide sanitary
    service to the entire recapture area,
    that Bloomingdale is
    able to provide service
    t.o the subject area at a lower
    overall
    cost
    than
    the
    Addison
    sewer
    system,
    that
    a
    majority
    of the citizens in the subject area are opposed to the
    boundary change as evidenced by the Medinah Home Owners
    opposition,
    and
    that
    the
    subject
    area
    is included in Bloomingdale’s
    long range plan.
    In their statement Bloomingdale does not
    indicate the existence of sewers in the subject area,
    so we
    must conclude that at present the Addison sewer, constructed
    by
    Kenroy,
    is
    the
    only
    system
    presently
    able
    to
    provide
    sanitary
    service.
    With
    this
    in
    mind,
    Bloomingdale
    would
    be
    unwise
    to
    attempt
    to
    duplicate
    the
    existing
    service.
    Bloomingdale
    also
    mentions
    their
    long
    range
    planning,
    and
    we
    must
    remind
    them
    that
    the Board’s Regionalization
    Program
    for
    the
    northern
    subregion
    of
    Region
    IV,
    in
    paragraph
    d.4,
    requires
    Bloomingdale
    to
    work
    together
    with
    the
    Villages
    of
    Roselle
    and Glendale Heights in planning and constructing
    interceptors, sewers,
    and sewage treatment plants and requires
    them to report to the Agency
    regarding
    their
    arrangements.
    In their comment in this proceeding, the Agency states that
    they have not received ~ report from the Villages within the
    northern subregion
    o.
    ~gion IV,
    and recommends that we
    inquire
    into
    the
    compi~. ion
    of
    agreements
    between
    the
    Villages.
    Although we will not make a redesignation of’authority for
    the northern subregion of Region IV at this time, we intend
    to
    do
    everything
    necessary
    to implement wastewater regionalization
    in DuPage County including,
    if necessary,
    a redesignation of
    authority.
    NIPC recommended that their previous recommendation,
    submitted as part of the record in R70-l7, be followed; with
    the addition that the regional boundary between Lake Street
    and Byron Road be the eastern boundary of the Medinah Lakes
    subdivision.
    We believe there to be merit in this last
    suggestion.
    Since the subdivision has no need for sanitary
    sewer service, no tap—ons to the Kenroy Sewer will occur
    within the subdivision so that whether or not the property
    is within Region I will not have
    a financial impact on
    Kenroy.
    The Agency’s comments were that Addison had submitted
    a facilities plan with their grant application that included
    95
    of
    the
    subject
    area
    and
    that
    the Agency would not be
    able
    to
    certify
    this facilities plan since the area was
    not
    entirely
    within
    Region
    I;
    that
    is.,
    the
    facilities
    plan is
    not
    in
    conformance
    with
    our
    Regionalization
    Program,
    spec!—
    fically
    paragraph
    a.l.
    In
    addition,
    the
    Agency
    was
    of
    the
    15—
    419

    —4—
    opinion that there
    is
    “no obvious negative environmental
    consequence which would result from the proposed boundary
    change”,
    and in fact the presence of an existing sewer may
    provide collection and treatment of sewage in the subject
    area at an earlier date when compared with other alternatives.
    The Board is loath to jeopardize
    a person’s ability to
    receive pollution abatement funds, unless there is another
    overriding environmental concern, which we do not find,
    especially when the, funding process requires facility’s
    p~a~’~*iig
    that is similar to our regionalization program.
    In
    this case,
    however, Addison’s facilities plan was submitted
    apparently
    with
    full
    knowledge
    of
    the
    Board’s
    regionalization
    program.
    We will not permit entities to ignore our regionali-
    zation program and we expect Addison to modify its plan to
    conform with the regionalization program as modified by this
    order.
    Regarding the comparison between alternatives
    in
    servicing the subject area,
    the Agency felt that additional
    technical information would be helpful to the Board, but
    recognized the possibility that “the cost differences between
    alternatives
    for servicing this area are inconsequential
    compared to the alleged economic hardship to the Petitioner
    and the environmental and social considerations of this
    decision”.
    The Board finds that,
    in this instance, cost
    differences when comparing potential service by Bloomingdale
    with service by the existing Addison sewer are in fact less
    important than other facts, discussed previously, present in
    this case.
    Therefore,
    the Board’s order with regard to the Petition
    for Modification submitted by Kenroy, will keep the Medinah
    Lakes subdivision within Region IV but will modify the
    remainder of the boundary as requested by Kenroy.
    ORDER
    1.
    The western boundary of Region I
    is modified so
    that paragraph a,l of Rule 1115 of Part XI Regional Sewage
    Treatment of Chapter
    3: Water Pollution reads in part as
    follows:
    Beginning at the intersection of the west boundary line
    of Section 1-40-10 and the Cook County Line;
    south along
    said boundary line and further south on Medinah Road
    (County
    24)
    to its intersection with Lake Street
    (U.S.
    20);
    15—420

    —5—
    south from said intersection along the present western
    boundary of the Village of Addison, being
    a line approximately
    parallel to and 600 feet east of the western boundary of
    Section 13—40—10,
    to its intersection with the north boundary
    of Section
    24—40-10; east along said boundary to the present
    western
    boundary
    of
    the Village of Addison, being approximately
    the eastern boundary of the western 1/2 of the northwestern
    1/4 of Section 24-40-10;
    south along said Village boundary
    to
    Byron
    Avenue;
    west
    on
    said
    Avenue
    following
    the
    southern
    boundary of the Medinah Lakes Estates subdivision to the
    western
    boundary
    of Section 24-40—10; south following said
    western boundary and further south following the western
    boundary
    of
    Section
    24-40-10
    to
    the
    Illinois
    Central
    Railroad
    tracks;
    east
    along
    said tracks to Proposed F.A.
    61
    2.
    This
    Order
    shall
    be
    published
    in
    the
    Environmental
    Register
    and
    be
    subject
    to public comment for a period until
    March
    25,
    1975.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    ~
    day of February,
    1975 by a vote of
    ‘1-0
    cL:&~5~47)
    ~
    Christan L. Moffeft
    lerk
    Illinois Pollution
    ntrol Board
    15
    421

    Back to top