ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    September
    20,
    1984
    CITY
    OF
    O’FALLON,
    )
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    V.
    )
    PCB
    84—148
    )
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION
    AGENC!,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF
    THE
    BOAR!)
    (by W.
    J. Nega):
    This
    provisional variance request comes before the Board
    upon a September 20, 1984 Recommendation of the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency).
    The Agency recommends
    that a 45—day provisional variance be granted to the City of
    O’Fallon
    (City)
    from
    35
    Iii.
    Mm.
    Code
    304.141(a)
    to
    allow
    removal
    from
    service
    for
    repair
    and
    maintenance
    of
    one
    of
    its
    wastewater
    treatment
    facility’s
    two
    package
    contact
    stabilization
    units,
    and
    to allow
    the
    Petitioner
    to
    exceed
    its
    interim
    NPDES
    Permit effluent limitations during the period that the unit is
    out
    of
    service.
    The City of O’Fallon owns and operates a wastewater
    treatment facility which includes two 1.5 million gallon per day
    (MGD) package contact stabilization units followed by a lagoon
    system.
    Effluent from this facility is discharged to Silver
    Creek pursuant to NPDES Permit No.
    1L0021636.
    The City has
    recently finished repair and maintenance work on one of the
    contact stabilization units and currently plans to perform
    similar repair and maintenance work on the other contact
    stabilization
    unit.
    (Rec.
    1).
    The Petitioner’s NPDES Permit provides that the
    City’s
    wastewater treatment facilities must meet effluent limitations of
    30 mg/i for
    both
    BOD
    and suspended solids.
    The following table
    summarizes the relevant information obtained from the Petitioner’s
    discharge monitoring reports to
    the
    Agency
    pertaining
    to
    BOD
    and
    suspended solids levels during the past year:
    60-165

    —2—
    Month
    Flow
    (MOD)
    DOD
    (mg/i)
    SS
    (mg/i)
    Sept0
    1983
    0.4
    28
    136
    Oct.
    0.8
    41
    67
    Nov.
    .1.5
    21
    61
    Dec.
    1.9
    40
    86
    Jan, 1984
    1.0
    15
    29
    Feb.
    1.6
    42
    80
    Mar.
    2.8
    53
    154
    Apr.
    2.7
    81
    37
    May
    1.3
    47
    30
    june
    1.3
    26
    36
    July
    0.4
    32
    57
    Average
    1.4
    37
    67
    (See:
    Rec.
    1—2).
    Although the City of O’Fallon did not request specific
    effluent limitations
    for the time period of its requested
    provisional variance,
    the
    Agency
    has
    recommended
    that
    effluent
    limits of 50 mg/i DOD and
    75
    mg/i
    suspended
    solids
    are
    reasonable
    and appropriate based on the previously delineated data derived
    from the Petitioner’s discharge monitoring reports.
    (Rec.
    2).
    On June 29,
    1984,
    the United
    States
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency (USEPA)
    issued an Administrative Order which required the
    City of O’Fallon to submit an explanation of why
    it had not met
    the requisite interim effluent limits and mandated that the
    Petitioner provide a schedule of steps that it plans to take to
    guarantee compliance with its effluent limits and to optimize
    performance of the existing wastewater treatment facilities.
    (Rec.
    2).
    In light of this Administrative Order,
    the Agency
    advised USEPA’S Engineering Unit on September
    17, 1984 that the
    Petitioner had applied for a provisional variance.
    (Rec,
    2).
    The Agency has indicated that the USEPA’s Engineering Unit stated
    that there was no objection to the Petitioner’s provisional
    variance request,
    (Rec.
    2).
    The City of O’Fallon has indicated to the Agency that it
    wishes to start draining the package contact stabilization unit
    to be worked
    on
    as soon as possible
    (i.e., on September 20,
    1984).
    The City intends to complete the necessary repair and
    maintenance work on the stabilization unit
    and
    return it to
    service by October 31,
    1984.
    (Rec.
    2).
    The Petitioner
    anticipates that this repair
    and
    maintenance work will include
    cleaning, sand blasting, and painting the tank as well as the
    fabrication and installation of new air drop pipes and diffusers.
    (Rec.
    2).
    80-186

    —3—
    The Agency has agreed with the Petitioner that the
    maintenance
    of
    the
    contact
    stabilization
    unit
    is
    necessary
    and
    believes
    that
    there
    is
    no
    practical
    alternative
    to
    taking
    the
    unit out of service to perform the requisite repairs and
    maintenance,
    (Rec.
    3).
    Moreover,
    the
    Agency
    has
    concluded
    that
    the
    environmental
    impact
    on
    Silver
    Creek
    caused
    by
    one
    stabil-
    ization
    unit
    being out of service will be minimal, since the
    other contact stabilization unit will be in service and the
    lagoons will remain available during the time period that one of
    the units is being repaired.
    (Rec.
    3).
    The
    Petitioner
    has
    asserted
    that
    an
    unreasonable
    hardship
    (due to the increased costs for utilities caused by the
    inefficient aeration system
    and
    the ultimate cost of a new
    treatment unit to replace the present one) would result if the
    necessary repair and maintenance work to the contact
    stabilization unit is not performed.
    The Agency agrees with the
    Petitioner’s contention in regard to such hardship.
    (Rec.
    3).
    Accordingly, the Agency has concluded that compliance on a
    short-term basis with the provisions of 35
    Iii.
    Adm. Code 304.141(a)
    would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship upon the
    Petitioner.
    Therefore, the Agency recommends that the Board
    grant the City of O’Fallon a provisional variance from Section
    304.141(a)
    for a period of
    45 days,
    subject to certain
    conditions.
    Pursuant to Section 35(b) of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Act, the Board hereby grants the provisional variance
    as recommended.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The City of O’Fallon
    is
    hereby
    granted
    a
    provisional
    variance from 35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code 304.141(a), subject to the
    following
    conditions:
    1.
    This provisional variance shall commence on
    September 20,
    1984 and shall continue for 45 days, or until the
    petitioner’s contact stabilization
    unit
    is
    returned
    to
    service,
    whichever occurs first.
    2.
    During the period of this provisional variance,
    the
    effluent discharged shall be limited to 50 mg/i BOD and 75 mg/i
    suspended solids.
    80-167

    —4—
    3.
    The Petitioner shall sample and perform laboratory
    analyses as required in its NPDES Permit No.
    1L0021636.
    40
    The Petitioner shall notify Mr. Michael Severns of the
    Agency’s Compliance Assurance Section via telephone at
    217/782—9720 when dewatering of the contact stabilization unit
    is
    begun;
    when painting and repair work is begun;
    and when the unit
    is returned to service,
    Written notification confirming the
    telephone notification shall be submitted within
    5 days thereof.
    This written notification shall be submitted to:
    Mr.
    Michael
    Severns
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Division of Water Pollution Control
    Compliance Assurance Section
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706
    5.
    The Petitioner shall operate and maintain the waste—
    water treatment facility so as to produce the best effluent
    practicable.
    6.
    Within 10 days of the date of the Board’s Order, the
    Petitioner shall execute a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement
    which shall be sent to the Agency at the address specified in
    item
    #4 of this Order.
    This
    certification shall have the following form:
    I,
    (We)
    ,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
    in PCB 84-148
    dated September 20,
    1984, understand and accept said Order,
    realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and conditions
    thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized
    Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO
    ORDERED.
    80-168

    —5-.
    I,
    Dorothy
    H.
    Gunn, Clerk of
    the. Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify
    that
    the
    ab3ve Opinion and Order was
    adopted on the ~
    day of
    ________________,
    1984 by a vote
    ~
    p27.
    Dorothy M. /Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    60-169

    Back to top