ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
May
3,
1984
IN
TRE MATTER
OF:
)
)
AMENDMENTS TO
35
ILL
ADM. CODE 604.203
)
R84-12
AND 605.104 OF SUBTITLE F:
PUBLIC
)
WATER SUPPLIES
(Trihalomethanes)
)
Inquiry Hearing~s.
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by J.
D. Dumelle):
On October
5,
1982 the Board adopted amendments to Chapter
6:
Public Water Supply
(now 35 Ill.
Adm. Code Subtitle F)
in
R81—11
(49 PCB
101).
That action established a maximum allowable
concentration of 0.10 mg/l for Total Trihalomethanes
(TTHM)
in
finished drinking water
(35
Ill. Adm. Code 604.203)
as well as a
sampling program
(35 Ill.
Adm. Code 605.104).
Those rules,
however,
applied only to water supplies serving over 10,000
individuals.
In the Second Notice Opinion issued on July 21,
1982
(47 PCB
453),
the Board stated that:
since these smaller supplies generally use ground water
sources and have shorter transport times, they are consider-
ably less likely to have TTHM levels exceeding the 0.10 mg/i
standard.
At the same time, universal applicability would
greatly increase the number of water sample analyses which
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency would have to
perform.
After more data are gathered on existing TTHM
levels, the Board may consider an additional rulemaking to
protect public water supplies serving less than 10,000
people.
In the eighteen months that the program has been in place,
the Board presumes that more data have been gathered.
Given that
research by the National Cancer Institute and the National
Academy of Sciences shows that TTHMs may be carcinogenic and can
lead to liver or kidney disorders, birth defects and central
nervous system damage, the Board concludes that it is approprate
to consider whether the TTHM standard and the sampling
requirements should be expanded to be made applicable to water
supplies other than those serving more than 10,000 individuals.
The Board,
therefore, authorizes the scheduling of inquiry
hearings to consider expanding the applicability of
35 Ill.
Mm,
Code
604.203
and 605.104.
The Board solicits comments and
58-67
2
proposals concerning these rules,
and, without in any manner
restricting the scope of the comments, proposals or hearings,
in particular
desires
that
the
following issues be addressed:
1.
In terms
of health protection and/or economics:
a)
Is classifying on the basis
of population appro-
priate for this rule;
is there a more appropriate
means.
b)
Is classifying
at a 10,000 population cut—off
appropriate,
and
approximately what percentage
of the State’s population is covered at this
cut-off.
2.
Should supplie~exempted from the requirement to
chlorinate be required to comply with this rule?
3.
Should supplies that provide no treatment other than
chlorination be exempted or treated differently?
4.
To what extent can the number of
affected facilities
be enlarged without creating
an undue administrative
sampling burden?
IT IS SO
ORDERED.
I, Christan T~, Moffett, Clerk o1~ the Illinois Pollution
Control B~d hereby certify that the above Order was adopted
on
the
~
day
of
~
~
1984 by a
vote
of
~
Chris tan
TT
~of’fe~,Clerk~
Illinois Pollution Control Boarl
58-68