ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December
    2,
    1982
    GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION
    OF NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 82—109
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR.
    RANDALL ROBERTSON AND MR. ERIC ROBERTSON, LUEDERS, ROBERTSON
    & KONZEN, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER;
    MS.
    HEIDI
    E. HANSON, DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL, APPEARED
    ON BEHALF
    OF RESPONDENT.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    I.
    G. Goodman):
    On September
    3,
    1982 Granite City Steel Division of National
    Steel Corporation (GCS)
    filed this petition for variance from
    Rule 203(d)(5)(B)(iii) of Chapter
    2, Air Pollution,
    to allow
    intermittent, uncontrolled coke pushing from two existing coke
    ovens during the rebuilding of a third oven.
    Hearing was held
    on October 26,
    1982.
    Both citizen testimony and public comments
    have been received by the Board in this matter.
    This situation is substantially similar to a previous request
    for variance by GCS in PCB 81—44.
    In that case the Board granted
    variance for reconstruction of one of the other coke ovens.
    The
    increase
    in emissions
    in this proposed variance would be approx-
    imately twice that of the variance granted
    in PCB 81—44 since two
    existing coke ovens will be
    in operation rather than one.
    Since
    the basic situation is the same as that delineated in the June 25,
    1981 Board Opinion in PCB 81—44, the Board shall not reiterate the
    details, but rather shall incorporate that previous Opinion by
    reference.
    This situation results from the continuing project by GCS
    to rebuild three coke oven batteries.
    During the first phase of
    construction involving renovation of Battery “C”,
    the enclosed
    pushing emissions control systems car serving Batteries
    “A” and
    “B” will be unable to service the last fourteen coke ovens.
    These fourteen coke ovens, however,
    can be serviced by the uncon-
    trolled conventional pushing systems car resulting in increased
    particulate emissions.
    Failure to use these fourteen ovens in
    50-81

    2
    their normal sequence would result in physical damage to the bat-
    teries.
    GCS estimates that the uncontrolled pushing will occur
    on approximately 176 calendar days intermittently over a period
    of approximately two years
    (R.
    7),
    It is estimated that uncon-
    trolled pushing will definitely take place 53 days at 24 hours
    per day, with a possibility of an additional
    60 days at 24 hours
    per day, and another 63 days during daylight hours only.
    The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) esti-
    mates that the grant of the proposed variance would create an
    additional
    30 tons per year of particulate emissions.
    For pur-
    poses of comparison, this is approximately one—half of the total
    emissions allowed Battery “C” when it is in operation.
    The
    facility is in a Non—attainment Area for particulate matter with
    monitoring data showing consistent violations of Rule 307 of
    Chapter 2,
    Ambient Air Quality Standards.
    The Agency has received six objections to this variance
    petition.
    These objectors are concerned mainly with the possi-
    bility of carcinogenic emissions which might threaten health
    and the enjoyment of property.
    As the Agency points out
    in
    its Recommendation,
    however, the carcinogens are contained in
    those coke oven emissions which are driven off during the coking
    process.
    Emissions which occur during the pushing process, which
    is subsequent to the coking process,
    are thought to be less car-
    cinogenic than other coke oven process emissions.
    At hearing,
    thirteen of the fourteen citizens testifying were in favor of the
    proposed variance citing
    for the most part their interest in the
    construction jobs and future increased employment at the plant.
    GCS alleges that should the Board refuse to grant the pro-
    posed variance, it must either risk damaging its existing coke
    oven batteries or forego rebuilding Battery “C”.
    If it is unable
    to rebuild Battery “C”, GCS alleges it will be
    forced to continue
    to purchase part of its coke requirement from “foreign countries.”
    The estimated cost of the proposed construction is $70 million and
    it will involve 150 to 250 construction workers over the period of
    construction.
    Upon completion,
    Battery “C” will require the perma-
    nent employment of an additional
    43 people at the facility.
    All
    the citizens and groups who support the petition for variance cite
    the present economic situation and the need for jobs in the area.
    The Agency recommends that variance be granted subject to
    certain conditions citing the hardship to the public due to the
    loss of both construction and permanent jobs in Illinois balanced
    against the minimal and temporary environmental impact.
    The Board
    agrees.
    Although there is no question that the operation of
    Batteries “A” and
    “B” without the use of the enclosed pushing
    emissions control system car will further burden an area where
    the primary particulate Air Quality Standard is already being
    exceeded, that burden is indeed minimal and probably contains
    the least troublesome of the plant’s emissions.
    In addition,
    50-82

    3
    as the Agency points out in its Recommendation,
    the total emis-
    sions caused by the variance would constitute less than one—half
    the emissions now allowed Battery “C” when it is in operation.
    It is also noted that ultimately the renovation of Battery “C”
    will result in a permanent reduction in the amount of particu—
    lates contributed by GCS to the area.
    The Board shall therefore
    grant the variance requested under certain conditions.
    To be
    consistent with the prior variance granted in PCB 81—44,
    the
    Board shall grant variance from Rules 102,
    203(d)(5)(B)(iii)
    and 307 of Chapter 2,
    Air Pollution.
    This Opinion constitutes the finding of facts and conclu-
    sions of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    Granite City Steel Division of National Steel Corporation
    is hereby granted variance from Rules 102,
    203(d)(5)(B)(iii)
    and 307 of Chapter
    2 of the Board’s Regulations for pushing
    operations related to Batteries “A” and
    “B” at its Granite City,
    Madison County, Illinois facility through December
    1,
    1984,
    subject to the following conditions:
    1.
    Granite City Steel Division of National Steel Corporation
    shall adhere to the construction schedule contained in
    Exhibit A,
    Table
    1 in its variance petition filed September
    3,
    1982, which schedule is hereby incorporated by reference
    as if fully set forth herein.
    2.
    Granite City Steel Division of National Steel Corporation
    shall give notice of the start and finish of each of the
    five construction phases at least
    five days prior to their
    occurrence and shall immediately give notice of any occur-
    rence which might affect its ability to comply with the
    schedule incorporated in paragraph 1
    above.
    Such notice
    shall be sent to the Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency,
    ll5A West Main Street, Collinsville, IL
    62234.
    3.
    Within forty—five days of the date of this Order, Peti-
    tioner shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environ-
    mental Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois 62706,
    a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement
    to be bound to all terms and conditions of this variance.
    This forty—five day period shall be held in abeyance for
    any period this matter
    is being appealed.
    The form of the
    certificate
    shall be as follows:
    50-83

    4
    CERTIFICATE
    I,
    (We),
    ,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 82-109,
    dated _______________________________, understand and accept the
    said Order, realizing that such acceptance
    renders all terms and
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Board Member
    J.
    Dumelle concurred.
    I,
    Christari L.
    Moffet, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby ~~rtify that~theabove Opinion and Order
    was adopted onAthe
    c~k”
    day of
    __________________,
    1982
    by a vote of
    ~-~)
    Illinois Pollution
    Ltrol Board
    50-84

    Back to top