ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
29,
1982
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
AMENDMENTS
TO THE WATER POLLUTION
)
R80-6
REGULATIONS OF THE ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
I.
Goodman):
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency) on
April
7,
1980 proposed amending Chapter
3:
Water Pollution in
response to the Third District Appellate Court~sinterpretation
of Board Rule 951(h)(2)
in Starcevich et al. v.
IEPA,
78 Ill.
App.
3d 700,
397 N.E.
2d 870.
On May 30,
1980,
the Board issued
a proposed Opinion and Order which included the language proposed
by the Agency and its own additional amendments
to Chapter
3.
Written public comments subsequently received by the Board
principally addressed the Board’s proposed amendments.
After
modifying its proposed Order in response to these comments,
the
Board published the rules
for First Notice and indicated public
hearings would be scheduled.
The Department of Energy and Natural
Resources developed an economic impact study, which was received
by the Board on December 11,
1981.
This rulemaking had three distinct objectives.
1~s
stated
above, the Agency sought to amend Chapter 3 definitions and
Rule 951(b)(2)
to limit the Starcevich court’s interpretation
of this Rule to that single case.
Secondly,
the Board proposed
amending those rules pertaining to Restricted Status for water
treatment authorities.
Lastly,
the Board sought to use this
regulatory proceeding to update
language found
in Rule
501 and
Part IX of Chapter
3.
Since this rulemaking was initiated, the
definitions proposed by the Agency have been added to Chapter
3
in R77—12, Docket
A.
After reviewing the public comments and
the Agency’s practice and authority to impose Restricted Status,
the Board has determined that major revision of the pertinent
rule
is unwise.
Combining procedural rules with the current
Rule 604 could only create confusion for those persons seeking
review of or variance from Restricted Status.
However, amending
Rule 604 to include provisions further delineating the Agency~s
procedures
for imposing Restricted Status may be beneficial.
Thus,
all that remains to be considered by this rulemaking
are non-substantive changes updating Chapter
3 and the substantive
amendments
to Rule 604 and Rule 95l(b)(2),
removing any prece-
dential value created by the Starcevich decision.
Rather than
hold merit and economic hearings on these minor amendments, these
issues and the non-substantive changes will be incorporated intp
R82—5,
Effluent Standards Revisions.
This matter is dismissed.
46—251
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify that the
bove Opinion and Order
was adopted on the
~g4-
day of
___________________,
1982 by
avoteof
.~-r)
ristan
L,
of~etf./’~erk
Illinois Pollution
rol Board
46—252