ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September
    15,
    1977
    VILLAGE OF BEECHER CITY,
    Petitioner,
    PCB
    77—194
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent
    OPINION AND~ORDEROF THE BOARD
    (by
    Mr.
    Young):
    This matter comes before the Board on
    a
    variance petition
    filed on July 18, 1977,
    by the Village of Beecher City, Illinois,
    (Beecher City)
    seeking relief from Rules
    203(c),
    402k
    and 404(f)
    in Chapter
    3 of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Rules and
    Regulations
    (Rules)
    regarding phosphorus.
    On August 15,
    1977,
    Beecher City filed an addendum to
    waive its right to a hearing and to amend
    its request to a
    Hphosphorus variance for fivt years.~ The Environmental Pro~
    tection Agency
    (Agency) filed a favorable recommendation on
    August 18,
    1977.
    On August 23,
    1977, Mr. John
    B.
    Doty,
    filed an objection
    to this petition.
    The objection expressed a fear that the
    effluent discharged from the Beecher sewage treatment plant
    (STP) would pollute his farm when the Wolf Creek overflows
    onto his land.
    The objection was not timely pursuant to
    Procedural Rule 404 and thus no hearing is required.
    However,
    the Board will take his comments into consideration in this
    opinion,
    The Village of Beecher City is planning to build a sewage
    treatment plant designed to treat an average flow of 0.075 MGD
    to meet the following standards:
    pH
    6.0—9.0
    BOD
    -
    30 mg/i in a 30-day average
    SS
    -
    30 mg/i in a 30-day average
    The effluent from the STP would flow into an unnamed tribu-
    tary of the Wolf Creek then into Wolf Creek along the property
    owned by Mr. Doty and finally via the Kaskaskia River into
    Carlyie Lake.
    Information provided by the National Eutrophication
    ~55~
    ~
    ~3

    Survey
    (Pet.
    p1) indi~atesthat the pLiosphorus
    contribution
    to
    the above
    s ated waterways is less than
    0,3 per cent of
    the total load
    It Beec~erCity upgrades its
    STP as anticipated
    (Pet.
    p4), and
    peiates
    it in accordance with the
    Act, the
    owners of
    ~
    ~ do~
    trea
    fror~the
    STP
    should not
    have any
    environmen:al. dift culties.
    Inc hoard
    iias orevi~usiydealt with
    many petitions
    in
    which relief was so ~hf from the requirement of
    meeting
    the
    phosphorus water quality atar.dard.
    Vi~~~Arenta
    and
    ~aeo~errCroo,
    ~CT 75—182
    ~CB
    75—183,
    18 PCB 552;
    ~~p~eston,
    ~CB /6~234;Sout1
    nr~
    Illinois University
    at Edwardsvi1~e
    POB
    7~11l, Va11e~y
    or Cori~pany,
    Inc., PCB
    77-146.
    In these a c other instanc
    theBoard
    has
    recognized
    that it is econoucilly
    impractical to comply with
    the limitation
    imposed by Rule 203(e).
    The Agency
    a ares t~atrequiring
    phosphorus removal to the
    0,05 mg/I level
    is
    t
    ti
    nically f~
    ole
    but economically un-
    reasonable
    (Rec
    ~)
    Accordinqiy,
    the Agency
    has filed a Peti-
    tion for Regu1ato~ change
    (P76—I
    with
    the
    Board which is
    intended to modify the exist~iro ~c~ohorus
    effluent
    and water
    quality standards.
    In view of th. case
    ~i’-edab~ve,
    Beecher City would suffer
    arbitrary and unreasonabt~oardsnip if th?
    Board were to impose
    upon
    them the 0
    05 mg1l
    hocphorus water
    quality standard.
    Absent claims of harm to t e public’s health,
    safety, or welfare,
    the Board is dispused to ~rant the relief as
    requested.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board~s
    findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    Tne Pii~ageor ~eeorier Dity
    is granted a
    variance for the
    operation of
    its oroposed sewage treatment
    plant from Rules
    203(c),
    402, and 404(f)
    cf Chapter
    3:
    Water
    Pollution Control
    Regulations as each applies to phosphorus,
    subject to the
    following conditions:
    I.
    ‘hat Petitioner provide space in its
    design for storage
    of chemicals ~r
    ~
    ire
    -~
    dosing equipment
    capable of meeting
    phosphorus standahs whi-~hmay be established
    by the Board.
    2.
    That Patitioner agrees to comply
    with the terms of R76-l
    or other modified uhosphorus standards when and
    if adopted by the
    Board.
    2655C

    3,
    That. Petitioner
    sha
    1
    ~xecute
    a.~
    d
    to
    the
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Bnforcem~rt
    P
    grams
    2200
    Churchill Road, Springfield, Iliinois,
    62706,
    cind
    to
    the
    Pollution
    Control Board within
    28 days after
    the
    date
    of the
    Board
    Order, an executed Certificate
    of
    Acceptance and agreement
    to be
    bound
    to
    all
    terms
    and
    conditio~~s of
    the
    variance.
    The
    form of this certification sall be as follows.
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We),
    the Order of the Illinois
    Pollut
    PCB 77-194, understand
    and
    acce~
    that such acceptarce
    renders
    all
    thereto
    binding and enforceable
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    SIGNED
    DATE
    he
    ing
    read
    or.
    Cont-ol
    Board
    in
    iid
    Order,
    realizing
    ~
    and.
    conditions
    I,
    Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of tr~.Illinois Pollution
    Control
    Board, hereby certify
    the
    abov~ Opinion
    and
    Order
    were
    adopted
    on
    the /~“day
    of
    ~
    1977
    by
    a
    vote of
    Christan
    L
    Moff4tV,;
    Clerk
    Illinois Po1lutlo~N~ontro1Board
    567

    Back to top