ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 12,
    1976
    CITY OF OAKL1~ND,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—182
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr.
    Young):
    This matter comes before the Board on variance petition
    filed June 23,
    1976, by the City of Oakland seeking relief
    from Rules 203(c),
    402 and 404(f) of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollu-
    tion Rules and Regulations as regards phosphorus.
    The Agency
    filed a Recommendation on July 29,
    1976; no hearing was held
    in this matter.
    The City of Oakland has an estimated population of 1,100
    persons and is
    located in Coles County.
    At the present time
    the City has no municipal sewage treatment facilities.
    The
    City’s collection system consists of storm sewers which also
    remove some domestic sewage with several discharge points to
    the Hog Branch of the Embarrass River, which
    is tributary to
    Lake Charleston.
    In January of 1976, the City was offered a
    Step
    I grant by the Agency for the preparation of a Facilities
    Plan.
    This Facilities Plan, which anticipates the use of a
    three cell aerated lagoon with submerged sand filter and chlori-
    nation facilities, was submitted to the Agency on
    May
    3, 1976,
    and the City is awaiting Agency approval thereof.
    The estimated
    cost for this treatment plant and sewer system is $2,209,840.00,
    with the City’s share of this cost estimated to be $650,000.00.
    Rule 203(c)
    sets a standard of 0.05 mg/i for phosphorus as
    P in any reservoir or lake, or in any stream at the point where
    it enters any reservoir or lake and Rule 402 requires that the
    City’s effluent not contribute to a violation of the Rule 203(c)
    water quality standard.
    The phosphorus concentration in the
    Embarrass River as it enters Lake Charleston presently exceeds
    .05 mg/i;
    therefore,
    the City’s effluent is water quality limited
    to the Rule 203(c)
    standard of
    .05 mg/i phosphorus.
    If the City’s
    proposed treatment facility does not meet the
    .05 mg/i standard
    of Rule 203(c),
    the Agency cannot issue a construction permit
    unless the City first obtains a variance from the Board.
    23
    345

    —2—
    The City alleges that this is no feasible method of attaining
    the phosphorus standard for its discharge.
    Furthermore,
    while
    the
    City did consider pumping the effluent into an adjacent watershed
    as well as land application, these alternatives were considered
    undesirable for economic reasons.
    Based upon the USEPA National Eutrophication Survey Report,
    the annual total phosphorus loading to Lake Charleston is 171,853
    pounds.
    Assuming
    10 mg/i phosphorus and an average flow rate of
    .185 MGD,
    the phosphorus loading from the City’s facility would
    be approximately 16 pounds per day, which represents
    3
    of the
    total.
    On January
    5,
    1976,
    the Agency filed a Petition for Regulatory
    Change
    (R76-l) with the Board which would amend the Regulations by
    requiring only point sources who have 1500 or more population equi-
    valent to treat wastewater
    to a level not to exceed
    1 mg/i prior
    to discharge.
    As justification for this proposal the Agency submits
    that eutrophication studies by both the United States Environmental
    Protection Agency and the Illinois State Water Survey show that
    the contribution of point source dischargers
    to the total phosphorus
    problem of lakes and reservoirs
    is small compared to the non-point
    contribution.
    The Agency submits that non-point sources, such as
    run—off waters from farm lands fertilized with phosphate base ferti-
    lizers,
    account for the overwhelming majority of the phosphorus
    loading of most lakes and reservoirs.
    The denial of this variance would prevent the City from utili-
    zing State/Federal grant funds to assist in the construction of a
    much needed sewage treatment plant.
    Balancing this hardship with
    the small contribution the City’s discharge will make to the Lake
    Charleston phosphorus problem leads the Board to believe that the
    City
    is entitled to relief.
    The Board will require, however,
    that
    the City design and construct the sewage treatment plant to allow
    for the possible future installation of appropriate removal facili-
    ties.
    Because the City ha3 applied for a lagoon exemption pursuant
    to Rule 404(c) (iii), the Board will also grant
    a variance from Rule
    404
    (c)
    (ii
    I)
    (1))
    rL~
    t.hM—
    rth1r~ ~ippl
    io~
    to
    i
    ~ioru~
    ~‘~nd
    \Ji
    I
    I
    dismiss
    Lh~ rcqI1es~
    I or
    v~~riance
    L~rom
    Rule
    404(L)
    This
    Opinion
    constitutes
    the
    Board’s
    findings
    of
    fact
    and
    conclusions
    of
    law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The
    City
    of
    Oakland
    is
    granted
    a
    variance
    for
    the
    operation
    of
    its
    proposed sewage treatment plant from Rules 203(c),
    402
    and
    404(c)
    (iii)
    (D)
    of
    Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution Regulations as regards
    phosphorus
    until
    September
    1,
    1981,
    subject
    to
    the
    following
    con-
    ditions:
    23
    346

    —3—
    I.
    This
    variance
    will
    terminate
    upon
    adoption
    by
    the
    Board
    of
    any
    modification
    of
    the
    existing
    phosphorus
    water
    quality
    standards
    and
    effluent
    limitations
    and
    the
    City
    of
    Oakland shall
    comply
    with
    such
    revised regulations when adopted by the Board.
    2.
    The
    sewage
    treatment
    plant
    shall
    be
    d~signed
    and
    con-
    structed to allow for the possible future installation of appro-
    priate phosphorus removal facilities.
    3.
    That portion of the Petition requesting relief from
    Rule 404(f)
    is dismissed.
    4.
    Within 35 days of the date of this Order,
    the City of
    Oakland shall submit to the Manager, Variance Section, Division
    of Water Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois, 62706, an
    executed Certification of Acceptance and agreement to be bound to
    all terms and conditions of the variance.
    The form of said certi-
    fication shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We), ____________________________ having read
    the Order of the Pollution Control Board in PCB 76-182,
    understand and accept said Order,
    realizing that such
    acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
    binding and enforceable.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board,
    hereb~y certify
    the
    above
    Opinion
    and
    Order
    were
    adopted~
    the
    j,..~
    ~‘
    day
    of
    ~
    ,
    1976
    by
    a
    Christan L.
    Moffe
    lerk
    Illinois Pollutio
    ntrol Board
    23
    347

    Back to top