ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 20,
1976
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
)
R75-15
RULE 602(d) (3)
OF THE WATER
)
POLLUTION REGULATIONS
)
INTERIM
ORDER
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
Mr.
Young):
The
Agency Regulatory Proposal
(R75-15) proposed that Rule
602(d) (3) be amended as follows
(new language underlined):
(d) (3)
All other combined sewer overflows,
by December
31,
1975, unless:
(aa.)
The discharger’s combined sewer overflow is
eligible for a construction grant under Section
201(g)
of the FWPCA,
(bb.)
The discharger has filed an application for a
construction g~ranton or before December 31,
1975,
and
(cc.)
The discharger is Rursuiny with diligence and
good faith all grant requirements includinS
but not limited to completion of any formal
grant application on a schedule acceptable to
the Agency.
Two
public hearings on the proposed regulation were held on
March 31,
1976 and April
7,
1976.
In response to suggestions
made at those hearings and in consideration of the testimony
and exhibits,
the Board, in accordance with Procedural Rule 211,
has revised the Agency proposal.
The Board now proposes that
Rule 602(d) of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution Regulations be amended
as follows
(new language underlined):
(d)
Compliance with paragraph
(c) of this Rule 602
shall be achieved on or before the following
dates:
(1)
All treatment plant bypasses, by the
applicable date for improvement of treat-
ment works under Part IV of this Chapter;
21
—
499
—2—
(2)
All combined sewer overflows within the
Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater
Chicago, by December 31,
1977;
(3)
All other combined sewer overflows,
by
December 31,
1975;
(4)
The cou~pliancedates set by
(d) (2) and
(d) (3)
shall be met unless:
(aa)
The discharger’s combined sewer
overflow is eligible for a con-
struction grant under Section
201(g) of the FWPCA;
and,
(bb)
The discharger has filed an appli-
cation for a construction grant on
or before March
1,
1977;
and,
(cc)
The discharger has timely taken all
appropriate pre-grant and post-~rant
actions necessary to the s~ecific
~rant step for which the discharger
is then eligible.
(5)
Nothing in 602(d)
(4)
above shall limit the
yower of the Board
to enter an order directing
immediate construction of facilities necessary
to abate pollution of the waters of the State,
when the Board has found,
as the result of an
inforcement case initiated under Sections 30-
34 of the Act, that the discharger is causing
or threatening to cause water pollution.
(6)
Whenever a discharger subject to the pro-
visions of this Rule files or has filed the
Project Completion Schedule required by Rule
1002 and receives a time extension through
the application of this Rule, said Project
Comyletion Schedule will be automatical1~
adjusted to reflect the time extension.
(7)
The exemption provided by
(d) (4)
above shall
terminate upon completion of construction
under the ~rant provided and compliance with
the provisions of this Rule shall thereafter
5e required.
The Board also proposes that Rule 409(a) of Chapter
3:
Water
Pollution Regulations be amended as follows
(new language under-
lined):
21
—
500
—3—
(a)
All effluent standards required to be met on
December 31,
1973 or December
31,
1974 shall
be met unless:
(1)
The discharger is eligible for
a con-
struction grant under Section 201(g)
of the FWPCA;
and,
(2)
The discharger has filed an application
for a construction grant on or before
December
31,
1975;
anci
(3)
The discharger has
timely taken all
necessary pre-grant and post—grant
actions appropriate to the specific
grant ste~for which
then eligible.
the discharger is
(4)
The exemption provided in
(a) (1),
(a) (2),
and
Ca) (3)
above shall terminate upon com-
pletion of construction under the grant
providedand~compliance with the provisions
oUthis Rule shall thereafter be required.
It is the Order of the Board that the foregoing proposed final
draft be published in the Environmental Register for comment pur-
suant to Procedural Rule
211.
Two additional hearings on the economic impact of the proposed
amendments will be scheduled in accordance with the provisions of
Section 27(b)
of the Environmental Protection Act and the proposed
final draft may be further revised in response to written sub-
missions received by the Board in comment on the proposal or from
consideration of the economic impact statement and the record of
the further hearings.
I, Christan L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Interim Order was adopted
on the
~
day of
if)
,
1976
by a vote of
Illinois Pollutio~
•trol
Board
21
—
501