ILLINO:i S
Z~OLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
April
5~ 1984
CITY OF HERRIN~AND HOUSING
)
AUTHORITY
OF
COUNTY
OF
WILLIAMSON~
Petitioners,
PCB 83—169
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
J.
Marlin):
This matter comes before the Board upon the filing of
a variance petition by the City of Herrin (Herrin)
on November
i6~
1903 requesting relief from
35
Iii. Adm. Code 309.241
(old Rule 962 of Chapter 3).
Pursuant to Orders of the Board
dated November
18,
1983 and January 12,
1984
Herrin amended
its petition.
The
Housing Authority of Williamson County
(Authority) was joined as a necessary party.
Illinois Environmental
Protection
Agency
(Agency) filed its recommendation to grant
the
variance
on March
21r
1984.
There have been no objections
to
the relief
sought and the right to a hearing has been waived.
Facts
Ths Authority proposes
to construct 18 units of low—income
housing north
of
Carroll Street and east of 13th Street in
~errin~
iLlinois~ The units will
be
housed
in
nine
buildings
and
will require
a
790 foot extension of an
8 inch diameter
sanitary
sewer.
The Authority~ with Herrin,
has obtained
$750~00O
in
financial
assistance
from
the U.
S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development
(HtJD)
to carry
out
the housing
proposal.
The
Herrin
wastewater
treatment
plant
(WWTP)
was placed
on
Restricted Status
on
August
29,
1980
by
the
Agency
for
exceeding
effluent
limitations.
The
Herrin
WWTP
serves
10,000
people
and
4 major industries.
The
plant
was
constructed
in
1950
while
the
sewer
system
dates
back
to
1938
and
was
modified
in
1964,
The
plant
provides
secondary
treatment.
Raw
sewage
bypasses
the
WWTP
during
wet
weather~
Inf low
from
several
storm
sewers
and
infiltration
during wet weather cause
basement backups and manhole overflows.
57-341
The
WWTP has a design
average flow of 1.2 million gallons
per
day.
Discharge
is
to
an
intermittent unnamed tributary
of the Big Muddy
River.
The proposed project will add a daily
average flow of 2600 gallons per day
(Petition at 3).
Herrin~sNPDES permit #IL0029165 expired on June 30,
1983 and Herrin has applied for its renewal.
A draft permit
specifying interim and final effluent limitations for Outfall
001 and 002
is under final
consideration by the Agency and proposes
the
following:
OUTFALL 001
Interim
Final
Parameter
Monthly Avg.
Monthly Avg.
(mg/i)
(mg/i)
BOD5
25
10
TSS
70
12
pH
Range of
6 to
9
6 to
9
Chlorine Residual
0,75
0.75
Ammonia Nitrogen
Sample only
(no limit)
(Agency
Recommendation at 3).
Limitations for
bypass
applicable to outfall 002 are in
35
ill.
Adm. Code
306.103(a)
and
(c).
Outfall 002 limitations
are
not
being met
by the WWTP,
According to the Agency,
Herrin
is capable of
substantially
complying with the interim effluent
limitations.
Currentiy~
Herrin
is participating in the Federal
Construction
Grants Program and
is awaiting a Step
2
grant
for the design
of a new
wastewater treatment plant that will
meet the final effluent limitations
aboveJ
If the variance
is
not granted, Herrin would have
to construct
a separate
wastewater
treatment facility
for the housing project or delay
the
project until
restricted
status
is lifted.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The
petitioner must.
assess the environmental
impact if
the variance was
granted.
35 Iii. Adm,
Code 104.121.
Rerrin
estimates that the housing project will add the following
to the existing
WWTP:
1The effluent limitations may differ from the final limitations
in
the
draft permit if discharge
is routed directly into the
Big Muddy River (Petition at 4).
57-342
—3-.
IMPACT OF PROPOSED HOUSING
PROJECT2
Parameter
Existing Condition
Proposed Conditions
Average Flow
0.980
0.983
Infiuent
SOD
91 mg/i
91 mg/i
Influent SS
208
mg/i
.
208 mg/i
DAP
2600 GPD
DMF
a
10920 GPD
HOD5
a
26 x 0.l7*/Cap./Day
a
4.42*/Day
55
a
26 x 0.20*/Cap./Day
a
5.2*/Day
“The additional wastewater will not hydraulically or organically
overload the existing system.”
(Petition at 6).
Any
negative
effect will be for 3 years when the upgraded treatment facilities
will be in operation
(fl).
My negative effect will be outweighed
by the positive effect on the community in supplying much-needed
low income housing.
Besides the impact on the existing WWTP, the impact on
the waters of the State must be considered.
An Agency inspection
report stated the following:
‘This
(Big Muddy River) is possibly one of the poorest
quality, at the point of withdrawal, both chemical and
physical, sources of surface water within the Region
5 (Southern Region) area.
The wastewater effluent
from at least nine community WWTP’s and the runoff
from at least 11 coal mines discharges either directly
into the Big Muddy River or one of its tributaries
upstream from the Cities Water Company
-
Royalton
WTP’
(Herrin is the closest
WWTP
and is one of the
largest).
(Agency Recommendation at 7).
The proposed project will add a minimal
amount
of discharge
to the
WWTP
and the impact on the environment will be negligible.
Herrin will be adding improvements to its wastewater system
in the near future.
In addition, the proposed housing project
will be required to reduce its wastewater volume by implementing
water conservation measures.
In its amended petition Herrin commented on several in-
expensive, easily installed water conservation devices which
would
lessen
sewer
loadings.
Manufacturers
estimate
that
these
devices
can
reduce household water usage by up to 40 percent.
Herrin concluded that it
could not require
that
the devices
be installed, but that it would have to be accomplished voluntarily
through an educational program put on by the petitioner.
(Amendment to Petition at
2 and 3).
The Authority plans to
use some water conservation devices throughout the proposed
units.
The Board encourages the
use
of such devices and will
require an educational program as a condition for granting the
variance.
2Petition at 3,4
57-343
HARDShIP
Petitioner must show that compliance
with the Board’s
rules and regulations would
impose an arbitrary or unreasonable
hardship.
Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1981,
oh,
111½,
par.
1035.
If
the
variance was denied,
the
Authority could only construct
6
of the
18 units and possibly lose the
$750,000 HUD assistance.
If the Authority
still
wanted
to build the 18
units, they
would
have to spend
$28,788
for an
on-site wastewater treatment
facility
(Amendment to Petition at 1,2).
This
option is cost
prohibitive relative to the cost of extending the sanitary
sewers to the area (Petition at
7).
The construction of this
treatment plant would violate Herrin zoning ordinances because
of the availability of sanitary sewers
(Id.)
HUD made a finding
of need for this low-income project
in Ilerrin.
This project
primarily will
house
elderly people.
The Authority has a
list of 250 low-income applicants awaiting housing
(Petition
at
8).
The
Authority
has
sought
public
housing
since
February
of
1980.
The WWTP was placed on
restricted status in late
August,
1980.
According
to the Agency:
During the negotiation sessions
of the PCB 79—239
proceeding in 1981,
Herrin stated openly
that it had
applied
for public housing
and requested from the Agency,
at that time, what was necessary
for Herrin to do to
warrant support from the Agency to extend
sewer service
to this public housing
project.
In
1981, the Agency
responded
that the
most
important criteria
would be
Herrin’s commitment and progress toward
building its
treatment
plant and commitment
to operating the existing
system as effectively
as possible.
Agency
Recommendation
at
9.
It
is
apparent
that
Herrin,
the Authority and the Agency were
aware that this project was
initiated prior to restricted
status
and
during
negotiations made
provisions for its
continuance.
The
Agency
is
satisfied
that
Herrin has now shown
enough
commitment
to
correcting
its
WWTP
problems to be allowed
to
connect
the
Authority~s
project.
Given
this chain of events,
the
hardship
was
not
self—imposed.
The
Agency
noted
that
Herrin
has
been
involved in an
enforcement
proceeding
for
effluent
and
bypass excursions
(Agency
Recommendation
at
5).
Notwithstanding
enforcement
actions~
in
its
recommendation
the
Agency
stated:
~7hile the Agency could readily justify
its
recommendation to deny based upon failures
evident
in the record, the Agency
is impressed by the need
for public housing
in
Herrin,
Agency
Recommendation
at
9.
57-344
The
Board
notes
that
prior
variances have
been granted where
the need for public housing has
been
balanced with the
environmental impact of adding to the sewage load
of the
existing facility,
~
of
Abin9~onand
Knox Count
Housin
~
50 PCB
419; ~
et a?.
v,
IEFA,
39 PCB 285,
In summary, Herrin sought public housing prior to the
imposition of restricted status,
is now showing commitment
to correcting its WWTP problems, has no economically feasible
alternative for treating waste water from
the
project, has
ade~oristratedneed for iow income housing for the elderly,
and cculd lose $750,000 in federal financial assistance if
the variance
is not granted.
The environmental impact from
granting the variance for the 18 units is minimal
in this
case.
Upon balancing these factors with the minimal environ-
mental impact,
the
Board finds that denial of the variance
would impose an arbitary or unreasonable hardship on the
petitioner.
Therefore,
based on the above,
the Board holds that denial
of the variance would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable
hardship on the petitioner,
The City of Herrin
is hereby
granted a variance from 35
Ill. Adm. Code 309,241.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of
the
Board in this matter.
ORDER
The City of Herrin is hereby granted a variance from
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code 309.241 to
allow the Agency to issue construction
and cperating permits for the
extension of a sanitary zewcr
to
the
proposed housing project site located north
of Carroll
Street and east of
13th Street
in the City of Herrin, Williamson
County,
Illinois,
subject to the following conditions:
1.
Water
saving
faucets
and water saving shower heads
shall
be
installed
throughout
the
18 unit project.
2.
Water
dams
or
similar
water
conservation
devices
shall
be
installed
in
the
flush
tanks
of
all toilets
in
the
18
unit
project.
3.
The
City
of Herrin shall conduct
an
educational
program
on
water
conservation to encourage its
citizens to voluntarily reduce water use
and
thereby relieve some of the load on its
waste water
treatment plant.
At a minimum this
program shall
consist
of the placement
of
at least
two display
advertisements,
discussing
the desirability of
water
conservation,
in a newspaper or newspapers
57-345
—6—
generally circulated in Berrin.
The advertisements
shall
generally
describe
the
simple,
inexpensive
water
conservation
devices
which
are
currently
available, their cost, and
how
they
might
be obtained.
4.
Within forty-five days of the date of
this
Order,
Petitioner
shall
execute
and
forward
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Compliance
Assurance
Unit, Water Pollution Control Division, 2200 Churchill
Road, Springfield, IL 62706, a Certificate of
Acceptance
and
Agreement to be
bound
to
all
terms
and
conditions
of
this
variance.
This
forty-five
day
period
shall
be
held
in
abeyance
for
any
period
during
which
this
matter is being appealed.
The form of the certificate
shall be as follows:
CERTIFICATE
I,
(We)
having read the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
in PCB 83—169, dated ________________________________
understand
and
accept
the
said
Order,
realizing
that
such.
acceptance
renders
all
terms
and
conditions
thereto
binding
and enforceable.
Petitioner
By:
Authorized
Agent
Title
Date
I,
Christan
L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control
Board,
hereby
certify
the
above
Opinion
and
Order
were
adopted
on
the
t”
day
of
______________,
1984
by
a
vote
of
L,-o
C
~
thristan
L.
Mo~f~WClerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
57-346