1. 60409
      2. 60-110
      3. ORDER
      4. exceed one year from the date of this order, subject to thefollowing conditions:
      5. Collinsville, Illinois 62234
      6. Mr. Joseph R. Podlewski, Jr.Enforcement Attorney
      7. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency2200 Churchill Road
      8. Springfield, Illinois 62706

ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
September 20,
1984
OLIN CORPORATION,
)
Petitioner,
)
PCB 84—69
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J. Theodore Meyerh
On June
4,
1984,
Olin Corporation
(Olin)
a foreign
corpora-
tion authorized to do business in Illinois,
filed a Petition for
Variance from 35
Ill, Adm, Code 237.102
(formerly Rule 502 of
Chapter
2:
Air Pollution, Part V:
Open Burning) which prohibits
open burning.
Hearing was waived by Petitioner
(Pet,
at
9),
and
because the rule for which variance is requested is not a part of
the Illinois State Implementation Plan, hearing
is not federally
mandatory
(Bd. Order of August
2,
1984).
No hearing was held,
and no public comments were received by the Board in this matter.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency) filed its
Recommendation on July 12,
1984, which recommends grant of vari~
ance
(Rec, at 8),
Previously, Petitioner has received variances from the Board
which allowed it to openly burn explosive wastes and allowed
operation of explosive waste incinerators at this facility
(PCB
71—60
(1971); PCB 71—371
(1972); PCB
71—517
(1973);
PCB 79—234
(1980); PCB 81—117
(1982); PCB 83—102
(1983).
The last variance
petition granted on August
30,
1983
(PCB 83—102) with an
August
31,
1984 expiration date,
allowed
activity
similar to that involved
in this Petition.
According
to the quarterly reports
submitted
thereunder and the Agency~sRecommendation, Petitioner complied
with the terms of that variance.
Impact on the region~s
air
quality during the term of
that variance was not significant.
Also of interest, the nearest resident,
interviewed in June of
1984,
stated
that
she had not
experienced
ariy
problems from
the
open burning permitted under that variance
(Rec.
pg.
4),
The
principle difference between that variance and this Petition is
that Olin
is now requesting
to burn kerosene as well as
distillate
oil.
This should not significantly alter the impacts from those
experienced during the last variance.
Petitioner operates an industrial facility leased from the
U.S. government in a former
U.S.
Army ordnance plant near the
60409

—2—
City of Marion, Williamson County,
Illinois, where
it
manufac-
tures ammunition and various
oropellant and pyrotechnic
devices
for the U.S.
Department of
Defense.
The plant has estimated
sales of $35,000,000 for
1984,
and employs 275 people.
Along
with the manufacturing facility,
Olin operates a test
:!iring
range
located nearby on
approximately 290 acres of strip
mine
spoil
lands.
Olin requests a
variance to allow open burning
at
this site for one year beginning
September
1,
1984,
in order
to
conduct tests required by the
Defense Department to
demonstrate
the ability of the ammunition to
ignite fuel in enemy
military
vehicles.
The tests involve firing
small and medium
caliber
bullets
into one—gallon
fuel containers containing fuel
oil or
kerosene
containing
0.25
percent maximum
sulfur per shot.
The amount
of
fuel involved is based on
the testing done under a prior
variance.
At the most, ten shots
(shots)
will be conducted per
day, and the
time
of actual open burning
is anticipated
to be five
minutes per
test
(shot),
No more than
250 gallons of fuel
oil
will be burned
over the term of the variance
(Pet,
at pp.
1—3).
As a result of
the test firing and subsequent
incidents of open burning
of the
fuel,
small amounts
of
sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxides,
carbon
monoxide, and total
suspended
particulates, will be
emitted.
Based
on ~
calculations, which were
verified by the
Agency,
these emission amounts should not significantly
impact
the
area~sair
quality,
which is considered to be attainment
for
all four
criteria
pollutants
(Pet.
at pp.
3-8; Rec. at
pp.
5-6).
The nearest
air
monitoring
station for sulfur dioxide
is
in
Marion,
Illinois, approximately five
miles away, and the
nearest
for total suspended particulates
is in Carbondale,
Illinois.
approximately 15 miles away.
During the period
of
the last
variance,
no violations were recorded at either station
(Rec,
at
p.
5).
In the past, Olin has actively pursued
methods
to eliminate
open burning in treating
explosive wastes,
spending
$180,000 for
air pollution control devices
(i.e.,
its incinerator)
since
1974.
However,
Petitioner
alleges that
it
is not economically
feasible
to develop a facility for its
test firings which would
allow
it
to simulate
actual
field
parameters.
Petitioner has
developed
measures
to minimize
effects
on human, plant and animal
life
during
the periods
of open
burning
(Pet.
Ex. C and D).
With its
Recommendation,
the
Agency agreed that no other feasible
method
is
available to
conduct these
ammunition tests
(Rec,
at 7).
Furthermore, Petitioner avers
and the Agency agrees that no
compliance plan is required
because when the test firing
is
stopped, compliance with the
Board regulations
is achieved
(Rec.
at
8).
The Board finds that
given the insignificant emission
amounts
per test and the economic and technical
difficulties
in developing
an alternative testing procedure
not involving open burning,
60-110

—3—
variance can again be granted to Petitioner for one year.
To
insure protection of the surrounding environment and residents,
the variance shall be conditioned, along with other items, to
require cessation
of
the test firings upon notification or receipt
of complaints from nearby citizens until meteorological conditions
are such that
the
open burning will not constitute violation of
Section
9(a)
of the Act.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of
law in this matter.
ORDER
Olin Corporation is granted variance from 35 Ill. Adm. Code
237.102
(formerly Rule 502 of Chapter 2)
for a period not to
exceed one year from the date of this order,
subject to the
following conditions:
1.
The Olin Corporation shall conduct the open burning
activities only in accordance with its Standard Operating
Procedures.
2.
Should Olin receive private complaints concerning its
open burning practices, or should the Agency contact Olin
concerning complaints it has received regarding the open
burning which is the subject of this variance, Olin shall
immediately discontinue testing until meteorological condi-
tions are such that the open burning will not constitute a
possible violation of Section 9(a) of the Act.
3.
Olin shall keep available
all records of the testing
which will enable it to develop an ammunition testing proce-
dure which does not constitute open burning as defined in
the Act.
4.
Petitioner shall submit quarterly reports of the test-
ing to the Agency, the first such report due thirty
(30)
days from the date of the Board Order entered in this matter.
Such reports shall be sent to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Air Pollution Control
115A West Main Street
Collinsville, Illinois 62234
5.
Within forty—five
(45) days after the date of the Board
Order the Petitioner shall execute and sent to:
Mr. Joseph R.
Podlewski,
Jr.
Enforcement Attorney
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois
62706
60-
ii

a certification of acceptance of
this
Variance by which
it
agrees to be bound by its terms and conditions.
This forty-fîve
(45) day period shall be held
in abey—
a~ce. for any
period
during
which
this matter is
appealed.
~
form
o~:he c
t~.f~c’aLton
stialJ be as
follows
CERTIFICATION
I~
(We),
,
having
read the Order of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board in
PCB
84~f
5,
dated
_________________,
understand and accept
the
said Order, realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
Petitioner
By:
Authorized Agent
Title
Date
iT IS SO ORDERED
I,
Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that
the
ahov’~Opinion
and Order was adopted
on the
________________
day of
~
,
1984 by a
vote
(I
of
‘90_I
Dor
II
Pol
Control
Board
60-112

Back to top