ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
8,
1984
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
)
pROTECTION
AGENCY,
Complainant,
)
v.
)
PCB 79—145
cEbcTEX
CORPORATION
and
)
pHILIP
CAREY
COMPANY,
)
)
Respondents.
ORDER
OF THE BOARD
(by B. Forcade):
On October 30,
1984, Celotex filed a motion seeking
a Board
ruling on certain motions pending before the hearing officer or
in the alternative leave to appeal the hearing officer’s ruling.
On November
2,
1984,
the Agency responded in opposition to that
motion.
On November
5,
Celotex filed a reply and supplement to
its original motion.
On November 5, the Agency responded.
Celotex3s October 30 motion is denied.
Pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm, Code Part 103, Subparts U and F,
the hearing officer has all necessary authority to rule on
discovery issues.
Unless a matter
is referred to the Board by
the hearing officer pursuant to Sl03.140(f), the Board will
er~t~rtain
interlocutory appeals
from hearing officer actions on
discovery
motions
only
in
unusual
circumstances.
Celotex
presents
no
such
circumstances.
Celotexvs assertion that the Agency will respond to
discovery
only
upon
Order
(Celotex
Motion,
~5), is specifically
refuted
by the Agency (Agency response, ¶2).
The hearing
officer~sOctober 30,
1984, seven page discovery Order adequately
addresses the pending Celotex motions.
The
Board rejects as frivolous Celotex’s request that this
Board edit certain portions of the October 30 hearing officer
Order to delete language which Celotex claims to be speculative
and
inappropriate,
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
81-01
2
I,
Dorothy
M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on the
j~c~
day
of
~
1984 by a vote of
,~
Dorothy M~T~unn,Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
61-02