ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
December 20,
1995
PEOPLE OF THE STATE
)
OF ILLINOIS,
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
PCB 94—174
(Enforcement-Air)
FEENEY OIL COMPANY,
INC.,
)
an Illinois corporation,
)
Respondent.
CONCURRING OPINION
(by J. Theodore Meyer):
I concur with the
majority’s
acceptance of the stipulation
of settlement in this case.
However,
I continue to be troubled
by the absence of any mention of attorney’s fees and costs in
these settlement agreements.
Section 42(f)
of the Environmental Protection Act (Act)
provides that the Board may award costs and reasonable attorney’s
fees in cases brought on behalf of the citizens of IllinoIs.
(415 ILCS
5/42(f)
(1994).
This section should be construed
broadly to allow the violator of the Act to reimburse the
Illinois taxpayer for all fees and costs incurred by the Attorney
General.
Attorney’s fees should include the employer’s share of
federal and Social Security taxes as well as health insurance and
life insurance.
Attorney’s costs should not only include direct
costs incurred by the individual attorney, but also indirect
costs such as:
travel time, administrative support, printing,
copying and overhead.
The time and money spent by Attorney
General in prosecuting this matter should have been used to
handle other matters.
In addition to fees, costs should include a “user fee” for
services like photocopying, and violators of the Act should pay
the user fees.
This case presented an opportunity for the
Attorney General to submit an affidavit of all fees and costs,
and I believe that the Board should have requested the Attorney
General to include these costs in its settlement.
If the Board
would pursue these fees and costs,
then the Illinois taxpayer
could be reimbursed.
For these reasons,
I concur.
f4~’44
2J.
~
J
~3
Theodo’~eMeyer
‘
Board Member
2
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify that
e above concurring opinion
was filed on the
~.4L~/—~
day of
~
—,
1996.
7,2
Dorothy M/~iGunn,Clerk
Illinois/~ollutionControl Board