ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

August

3,

1995

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

Complainant,

v.

)

AC

95—47

(IEPA No.

370-95-AC)

ALLIED WASTE

)

(Administrative Citation)

INDUSTRIES,

INC..,

Respondent.

CONCURRING OPINION

(by J. Theodore Meyer):

I concur with the majority’s opinion and order in this case;

however,

I believe that attorney’s fees and costs should be

included in all penalties imposed in administrative citations.

Section

42(f)

of the Environmental Protection Act

(Act)

provides that the Board may award costs

and reasonable attorney’s

fees in cases brought on behalf of the citizens of Illinois.

(415 ILCS 5/42(f)

(1992)).

This section should be construed

broadly and include administrative citation penalties brought by

the State,

or by any unit of local government vested with the

authority to impose such citations,

pursuant to Section 4(r)

of

the Act.

In addition to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs,

indirect expenses such as

travel time,

administrative support,

printing,

copying and overhead should also be pursued.

After

all,

the time spent by complainant’s attorney in prosecuting this

matter certainly could have been used to handle other matters.

Also,

the now common practice by state and local governments of

charging a “user fee” to those who use

a service

(such as paying

for photocopies)

is certainly a cost that should be imposed on a

party who has violated the Act.

This case presented an

opportunity for the complainant to submit an affidavit of all

costs,.

and

I believe that the Board should have taken this

opportunity to reimburse the Illinois Environmental Protection

Agency.

In this case,

the administrative citation neither requests

the imposition of such costs and fees nor explains whether some

percentage of costs and fees was figured into the penalty.

AttorneysT

fees and costs incurred during the administrative

citation process should be pursued on behalf of the Illinois

taxpayer,

and

I urge the parties to bear this

in mind in future

negotiations

in this case.

---

T~4~oreMe~er

Board Member

I, Dorothy M.

Gunn,

Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control

Board, hereb~~certify tha~the above concurring opinion was filed

on the

9~’—

day of

_______________,

1995.

0

Dorothy M. Gu~p, Clerk’

Illinois Pollution Control Board