ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
3,
1995
WILL COUNTY
Complainant,
V.
)
AC 95—46
(County No.
95 AC 08)
WILLIAM MINTZ,
)
(Administrative Citation)
Respondent.
CONCURRING OPINION
(by J.
Theodore Meyer)
I concur with the majority’s opinion and order
in this case;
however,
I believe that attorney’s fees and costs should be
included
in all penalties imposed in administrative citations.
Section 42(f)
of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
provides that the Board may award costs and reasonable attorney’s
fees
in cases brought on behalf of the citizens oi :llinois.
(415 ILCS
5/42(f)
(1992)).
This section should be construed
broadly and include administrative citation penalties brought by
the
State,
or
by any unit of local government vested with the
authority
to impose such citations,
pursuant to Section 4(r)
of
the Act.
In addition
to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs,
indirect expenses such as travel
time,
administrative support,
printing,
copying and overhead should also be pursued.
After
all,
the time spent by complainant’s attorney in prosecuting this
matter certainly could have been used to handle other matters.
Also,
the now common practice by state and local governments of
charging
a “user fee” to
those who use
a service
(such as paying
for photocopies)
is certainly a cost that should be
imposed on
a
party who has violated the Act.
This case presented an
opportunity for the complainant
to submit an affidavit of all
costs,
and
I believe that the Board should have taken this
opportunity to reimburse the county.
In this case,
the administrative citation neither requests
the imposition of such costs and fees nor explains whether some
percentage of costs and fees was figured into the penalty.
Attorneys’
fees and costs incurred during the administrative
citation process should be pursued on behalf of the Illinois
taxpayer, and
I urge the parties
to bear this
in mind in future
negotiations
in this case.
J.
~eodore
~eyer
Board Member
I,
Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that the above concurring opinion was filed
on the
~
day of
______________,
1995.
Dorothy N. c~in, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board