ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February 16,
    1995
    MAJOR
    & SANDHU PETROLEUM,
    INC.,
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 94—313
    )
    (Variance
    Air)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    WALTER ZARNECKI APPEARED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER;
    BONNIE R.
    SAWYER APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by R.C. Flemal):
    This matter comes before the Board upon a petition for
    variance filed by Major and Sandhu Petroleum,
    Inc.,
    (Sandhu) on
    October 31,
    1994.
    Sandhu seeks variance from the Stage II vapor
    recovery (Stage II) compliance date of November 1,
    1994 found at
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586(d) (3).
    The term of the requested
    variance is from November 1,
    1994 to March 31,
    1995.
    The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the
    Environmental Protection Act
    (Act)
    (415 ILCS 5/1 et seq.
    (1992).)
    The Board is charged there with the responsibility of granting
    variance from Board regulations whenever it is found that
    compliance with the regulations would impose an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship upon the petitioner.
    (415 ILCS 5/35(a).)
    The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    is required
    to appear in hearings on variance petitions.
    (415 ILCS 5/4(f).)
    The Agency is also charged,
    among other matters, with the
    responsibility of investigating each variance petition and making
    a recommendation to the Board as to the disposition of the
    petition.
    (415 ILCS 5/37(a).)
    The Agency filed its variance recommendation (Rec.)
    on
    December 20 19941.
    The Agency recommends grant of the variance.
    Hearing was held on December
    21,
    1994 in Chicago, Illinois,
    before hearing officer June C. Edvenson.
    The Agency presented
    testimony of Terry A.
    Sweitzer, Manager of the Agency’s Air
    Monitoring Section and Administrator of the Illinois Stage II
    Vapor Recovery Program.
    The Agency was granted an extension of time to file the
    recommendation by Board order of December 14,
    1994.

    —2—
    As presented below,
    the Board finds that Sandhu has met its
    burden of demonstrating that immediate compliance with
    35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 218.586(d) (3) would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable
    hardship.
    Accordingly, the variance request will be granted.
    BACKGROUND
    The facility at issue is located at 1337
    S. Harlem,
    Berwyn,
    Illinois.
    Sandhu, which is an Illinois Corporation formed on
    August 23,
    1994,
    has leased the facility and taken over the
    business operations as of November 1,
    1994.
    (Pet.
    at ¶10.)
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586 establishes air emission control
    requirements applicable to motor vehicle fueling operations
    (MVFO) located in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area.
    The
    purpose of the requirements is to limit emissions of gasoline
    vapors into the air.
    Gasoline vapors are volatile organic
    materials
    (VON)
    that contribute to the formation of ozone in the
    lower atmosphere.
    Limiting emissions of VON is one of the
    methods for controlling unwanted ozone formation.
    Among the MVFO regulations is a requirement that certain
    MVFOS install Stage II vapor recovery equipment no later than
    November
    1,
    1994.
    (Section 218.586(d)(3).)
    It is uncontested
    that this provision applies to Emro’s Romeoville facility.
    Stage II vapor recovery equipment is designed to capture
    VOM emissions during the fueling of vehicle tanks.
    The emissions
    consist of gasoline vapors displaced from the motor vehicle tank
    by dispensed liquid gasoline as the tank is filled.
    The Stage II
    equipment captures vapors that exit the vehicle’s fuel fillpipe,
    thereby preventing the escape of the vapors into the atmosphere.
    The captured vapors flow through a vapor passage in the fuel pump
    nozzle into a vapor hose and then through vapor lines to the
    underground storage tank.
    HARDSHIP AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
    Sandhu’s contends that requiring immediate installation of
    the Stage II equipment would cause a financial hardship.
    Sandhu
    contends that it has been unable to obtain the financing for
    Stage II installation in the short time during which it has been
    in business.
    (Pet.
    at ¶10.)
    Sandhu further contends that by the
    time financing is obtained, winter weather will inhibit immediate
    installation.
    (a.)
    There are no control measures that could be temporarily
    imposed that would achieve immediate compliance.
    The Agency
    notes its “awareness of the difficulties associated with
    obtaining financing for construction projects at small gasoline
    facilities”
    (Rec. at ¶13)

    —3—
    Sandhu contends that the environmental harm that would be
    occasioned by delaying installation of the Stage II equipment
    would be negligible.
    (Pet.
    at ¶11.)
    In support of this
    position, Sandhu presents estimates of vapor emissions likely to
    occur from the Sandhu facility, and concludes that the emissions
    would constitute approximately
    .00007 percent of the total
    Chicago area emissions.
    (u.)
    The Agency believes that,
    while Sandhu significantly
    underestimates its emissions
    (Rec. at ¶18),
    the emissions are
    indeed small relative to the total emissions in the Chicago area.
    (Rec.
    at ¶19.)
    On this basis the Agency concedes that granting
    the variance would be appropriate, but only so long as Sandhu
    commits to coming into compliance within a short time period.
    (Rec.
    at ¶20.)
    CONCLUSION
    The Board agrees with the Agency that Sandhu has
    demonstrated that immediate installation of the Stage II
    equipment would constitute a hardship for Sandhu.
    The Board also
    finds that,
    so long as the installation is undertaken
    expeditiously, the accumulated environmental harm will be small
    and that the hardship thereby rises to the level of arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship.
    On this basis,
    the Board will grant the
    requested relief with conditions.
    The principal condition is that Sandhu must have the
    necessary Stage II equipment installed and operational by March
    31,
    1995, which is the date upon which this variance will
    terminate.
    Sandhu had originally requested that the variance
    extend an additional month.
    (Pet.
    at ¶1.)
    However,
    at hearing
    Sandhu modified the request to accord with the Agency’s
    recommendation of a March 31,
    1995 termination.
    (Tr. at p.
    12;
    Rec. at ¶26.)
    As the Agency observes, installation by March 31,
    1995 will allow Sandhu to be in compliance at the onset of the
    1995 ozone season2.
    (Rec.
    at ¶20.)
    The environmental harm that
    would otherwise occur if the variance extended into the 1995
    ozone season is thereby lessened.
    The Board also accepts as a necessary condition the Agency’s
    recommendation
    (Rec.
    at ¶26) that Sandhu not dispense gasoline
    any time after March 31,
    1995 during which Stage II equipment has
    not yet been installed.
    As regards the beginning date for the variance, the Board
    notes that it is well established practice that the term of a
    2
    The ozone season is defined by the United States
    Environmental Protection Agency as the annual period from April
    1
    through October 31.

    —4—
    variance begins on the date the Board renders its decision,
    unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.
    (See,
    e.g., DM1.
    Inc.
    v.
    IEPA, PCB 90-227,
    128 PCB 245-249, December
    19, 1991.)
    Here Sandhu requests that start of the variance be
    retroactive to November 1,
    1994.
    In view of Sandhu’s recent
    entry into the petroleum marketing business and the Board’s
    knowledge of contractor and equipment shortages associated with
    installation of Stage II equipment,
    the Board finds that the
    instant circumstances are sufficiently unusual to warrant the
    short retroactive start of the variance requested by Sandhu.
    Lastly, the Board notes that the Agency requests that the
    Board use a form of the certificate of acceptance that is
    different from the traditional certificate.
    The Board declines
    this request for reasons addressed in a separate order of this
    date.
    (See The UNO-VEN Company v. IEPA, PCB 94-282,
    slip op.
    February 16,
    1995.)
    This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    Major
    & Sandhu Petroleum,
    Inc.,
    is hereby granted variance
    from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586 for its facility located at 1337
    S. Harlem,
    Berwyn,
    Illinois, subject to the following conditions:
    1)
    The term of the variance is for the five-
    month period from November
    1,
    1994 through
    March 31,
    1995.
    2)
    If Stage II vapor recovery equipment is not
    installed and operational by March 31,
    1995,
    petitioner shall cease dispensing operations
    at its facility until such time as Stage II
    equipment is installed and operational.
    3)
    Petitioner shall notify the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency of the
    installation of any Stage II vapor recovery
    with 14 days of the installation.
    Notice
    must include the address of the facility and
    be by letter posted to:
    Mr. Terry Sweitzer, P.E.
    Manager, Air Monitoring Section
    Division of Air Pollution Control
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    P.O. Box 19726
    Springfield, Illinois
    62794—9276;
    IT IS SO ORDERED.

    —5—
    If petitioner chooses to accept this variance subject to the
    above order, within 45 days of the date of this order petitioner
    shall execute and forward to:
    Bonnie R. Sawyer
    Division of Legal Counsel
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    2200 Churchill Road
    Post Office Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794—9276
    a Certification of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to all
    terms and conditions of this variance.
    The 45-day period shall
    be held in abeyance during any period that this matter is being
    appealed.
    Failure to execute and forward the Certificate within
    45 days renders this variance void and of no force and effect as
    a shield against enforcement of rules from which variance was
    granted.
    The form of said Certification is as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),
    hereby accept and agree to be bound by all terms and conditions
    of the order of the Pollution Control Board in PCB 94-313,
    February
    16,
    1995.
    Petitioner
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act
    (415 ILCS
    5/41
    (1992)) provides for the appeal of final Board orders within
    35 days of the date of service of this order.
    The Rules of the
    Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
    (See
    also 35 Il1.Adm.Code 101.246 “Notions for Reconsideration”.)

    —6—
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the aboveo inion and order was
    adopted on the
    /
    ~
    ~
    day of ______________________,
    1995 by a
    vote of
    7—c
    .
    /1
    Dorothy M. Gup?1,
    Clerk
    Illinois Po1’1~itionControl Board

    Back to top