ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
January 6,
1994
OLIN CORPORATION,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 91—87
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER
OF THE
BOARD
(by C.A. Manning):
On May
23,
1991,
Olin Corporation
(“Olin”)
filed a petition
for hearing to review certain conditions contained in modifications
made by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Agency”) of
Olin’s closure plans for several different hazardous waste units at
the East Alton, Illinois facility.
On December 28,
1993, Olin and
the Agency filed a joint status report pursuant to Board order of
September 23,
1993.
The parties report they continue to pursue
settlement and as was stated in their previous joint status report
filed
September
20,
1993,
they
have
agreed
in
principle
to
coordinate the closure of several of the units
involved
in this
appeal with the RCRA Facility Investigation planned as part of the
facility’s Part B hazardous waste permit.
The parties
re—state
from
the
prior
status
report,
that
pursuant
to
settlement
discussions, on September 7,
1993, Olin submitted to the Agency, a
modified closure/post—closure plan for three of the units which are
the subject of this appeal.
Olin again states that certificates of
clean closure
for the
other units which are the subject of this
appeal were previously submitted to the Agency.
Since September 20, 1993, the Agency has reviewed the modified
closure/post-closure plan and the closure certifications and
is
currently discussing the details of
these
plans with Olin.
On
October 6,
1993, the Agency determined that the closure of seven of
the hazardous waste units which are the subject of the appeal have
met the requirements
of
the Agency’s
interim
status
standards.
Olin
and
the
Agency
are
discussing
the
status
of
the
three
remaining units
for which Olin submitted
certificates
of clean
closure, but the Agency has not yet determined whether the closure
meets the interim status standards.
The parties
intend to
continue their
discussions
and are
hopeful they will lead to certification of closure for most of the
closing units and agreement on closure/post—closure plan conditions
for the remaining units.
Olin states that if agreement is reached,
it will move for dismissal of the appeal. The parties also state
they expect, most,
if not all issues in the appeal may be resolved
without a hearing, and they have therefore not commenced discovery.
2
The Board
accepts the
status report
filed
by Olin and the
Agency.
As the parties may be aware,
on January
8,
1993,
Olin
filed
a one-year waiver of the statutory decision deadline in this
case from May
1,
1993 to May
1,
1994.
Though the parties have
stated a hearing may not be required and discovery has not yet been
commenced,
should a hearing become necessary,
the Board,
and the
assigned hearing officer, require 120 days in which to schedule the
hearing, give public notice, establish a briefing schedule, receive
and review
the transcript
and
fully
deliberate
on the
matter.
Given such time restraints and the parties’
stated
intent,
the
Board must
receive
a
further waiver
of the
statutory decisior
deadline prior to the January 20, 1994 Board Meeting, or we will be
required to direct the assigned hearing officer to set a hearing
schedule.
If such a waiver is timely filed, we will re—establish a
status report schedule at the January 20th Board Meeting.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
~p~rd, hereby certif
hat the above order was adopted on the
~
day of _______________________,
1994,
by a vote of
7-o.
7
(7
~
2~.
DorothyM. Gu~h,Clerk
Illinois Pol~ttitionControl Board