ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
25, 1991
SEXTON ENVIRONMENTAL
)
SYSTEMS,
INC.,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 91-4
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
CONCURRING OPINION
(by J. Theodore Meyer):
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that special condition
#29 of the permit issued by the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
to
Sexton
Environmental
Services
should
be
stricken.
However,
I concur to express my concerns
in two areas.
First,
I
continue to be wary of cases
(such as this
one)
involving trade
secret claims.
Unlike the judiciary,
Board members apparently do
not have any type of immunity or “malpracticet’ insurance coverage.
The
State
should
either
grant
immunity
or
agree
to
defend
individual
Board members should a party sue the Board on a trade
secret determination.
Second,
I am bothered by the implication in
this decision that the Board will not address the recycling issue
at this time simply because the waste
is destined for
an out-of-
state landfill.
For these reasons,
I concur.
~
J.’~TheodoreMeyer
Board
Member
I,
Dorothy
M.
Gunn,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
hereby
certify
that
the
above
Concurring
Opinion
was
filed
on the
~29’~
day
of
_______________,
1991.
Dorothy M. G~hf1, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
121—641