ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 28,
1991
PEOPLE OF THE STATE
)
OF ILLINOIS,
Complainant,
V.
)
PCB 90—12
(Enforcement)
HYSAN CORPORATION, an
Illinois corporation,
Respondent.
RICHARD A. VERKLER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON BEHALF
OF COMPLAINANT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
CAROLYN HESSE,
MCDERMOTT,
WILL AND EMERY,
APPEARED ON BEHALF OF
RESPONDENT HYSAN CORPORATION.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by M. Nardulli):
This matter comes before the Board upon a complaint filed on
January
25,
1990,
by Neil
F.
Hartigan,
Attorney General of the
State of Illinois, against respondent,
Hysan Corporation
(Hysan),
an Illinois corporation.
The complaint alleges that Hysan operated
its Blue Island facility, which manufactures products such as hair
spray,
pesticides,
air fresheners and other household sprays,
in
violation of section 9(b) of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act
(Act)
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1989,
ch.
111 1/2,
par.
1009
(b))
and
sections 201.143
and 201.144 of the Board’s air regulations.
(35
Ill.
Adm. Code 201.143.)
Hearing was held on this matter on July 30,
1990
in Chicago,
Illinois.
At
the
hearing,
the Attorney General
read
into the
record the terms of a stipulated agreement.
This “Stipulation of
Facts
and
Proposed
Settlement”
was
subsequently
signed
by
the
parties and
sets
forth the full statement of
all material
facts
pertaining to the nature, operations and circumstances surrounding
the
claimed
violations.
Hysan
neither
admits
nor
denies
to
violations of the Act and Board regulations.
Hysan obtained an
operating permit
for the equipment which
is the subject of this
action on June
19,
1989.
Hysan
agrees to pay a penalty of ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) into the Environmental Protection Trust
Fund.
The
Board
has
the authority
to
impose
a penalty where
the
parties
have
stipulated
to
a
penalty,
but not to
a
finding
of
violation.
(Chernetco,
Inc.
v. PCB, 488 N.E.2d 639,
643
(5th Dist.
119—17
2
1986);
Archer
Daniels Midland
v.
PCB,
489 N.E.2d 887
(3d Dist.
1986)
.)
The Board finds the settlement agreement acceptable under 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
103.180.
This
settlement
agreement
in
no
way
affects respondent’s responsibility
to
comply with any
federal,
state or local regulations,
including but not limited to the Act
and the Boards’s air pollution regulations.
This
Opinion constitutes the Board’s
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
1.)
The
Board hereby
accepts the Stipulation of
Facts and
Proposed
Settlement
executed
by
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection Agency
and Hysan
Corporation
concerning violations of section 9(b)
of the Act and 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 201.143 and 201.144.
The Stipulation of
Facts
and
Proposed
Settlement
are
incorporated
by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
2.)
Hysan shall pay the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000)
within 30 days of the date of this Order and the sum of
$5,000 within 120 days of the date of this Order.
Such
payment shall be made by certified check or money order
payable
to
the
Treasurer
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
designated to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund,
and shall be sent by First Class mail to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
2200 Churchill Road
P.O.
Box 19276
Springfield,
IL. 62794—9276
Hysan
shall
also
write
its
Federal
Employer
Identification Number or Social Security Number on the
certified check or money order.
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill. Rev. Sat.
1987,
ch.
111 1/2, par.
1041)
provides for appeal of Final Orders
of the Board within
35 days.
The Rules
of the Supreme Court
of
Illinois establish filing requirements.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
J.Theodore Meyer dissents.
119—18
3
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, her~bjcertify that theMabove Opinion and Order was adopted
on the
~
day of ________________________
of
.c-/
______________________
991, by a vote
1~.
Dorothy N.~unn, Ci’erk
Illinois ~6llution Control Board
119—19