ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
29,
1990
NATURAL
GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
)
OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 87—150
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
J.
C. Marlin):
On June
7,
1990, the Board directed the parties
to submit
a
status
report on this permit appeal no later than October
1,
1990.
The Board stated that:
“If this case is not settled by
that date,
the Board will consider ordering
it
to hearing or
dismissing
it
for want of prosecution.”
On October
11,
1990,
the
Board directed the Hearing Officer
to schedule this matter
for
hearing
by October
30,
1990 and to complete all such hearings no
later than December
31,
1990.
The Hearing Officer scheduled a
hearing for December
14,
1990.
Petitioner operated a Class
I non—hazardous underground
injection well called the Herscher Well pursuant
to the interim
“authorization by rule” provisions of
the Board’s
regulations a
35
Ill. Adm. Code 704.
Petitioner
filed
a timely application for
a permit for the Herscher Well on September
5,
1985.
The permit
application was denied by the Respondent
in September,
1987.
Petitioner filed an appeal of this denial on October
9,
1987.
Pursuant
to
35 Iii. Adm.
Code 705.205,
the permit
is stayed
pending the resolution of this appeal.
The motion states
that:
“the parties have agreed that the Agency will
issue a draft permit for the Herscher ~7elland
Natural will dismiss this appeal.
The Agency
has agreed to
issue a draft permit on November
30,
1990,
or as soon thereafter as possible,
and Natural will dismiss this appeal promptly
thereafter.”
On November
7,
1990 an “Agreed Motion To Stay Expiration Of
Permit
By Rule In Connection With Dismissal Of Appeal” was
filed.
The motion
requests that the Board by order grant
a
continuing stay
to the Petitioner after dismissal
of this appeal,
in order
to continue regulatory authority to operate under permit
116—217
—2—
by rule.
Section 705.205 provides that:
“if
an appeal
to the Board
is filed,
the effective date of
the permit and all conditions are
stayed until the appeal
is concluded,
unless
the Board orders
otherwise.t’
The Petitioner believes that dismissal puts the stay
upon which they are relying
at
risk.
This case was originally filed October
9,
1987.
On November
15,
1988, a Hearing Officer Order was
filed with the Board
stating that the parties had reached a settlement through which a
permit would be issued.
As the previous discussion has shown the
matter remains unresolved.
The Board
is reluctant to grant
an
indefinite stay of the permit denial in this proceeding.
The
fact that
a draft permit will be issued at
a future date
by no
means assures
the Board
that the matter
is resolved.
The Board
feels
it
more appropriate that the hearing scheduled for December
14,
1990,
be continued in order
to ensure complete and final
resolution of
this appeal.
Therefore,
the Board grants a
continuance of that hearing.
However,
if
the Board has not
received
a motion to dismiss this proceeding by January
2,
1991,
this matter will be set for hearing on the merits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, ~ereby
certify that
the above Order was adopted on
the
~c7~-~day
of
__________________,
1990, by
a vote
~6~hyM.unn,Clerk
Illinois P6llution Control Board
11.6—218