ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 25,
1990
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
Complainant,
AC 90—55
V.
)
(IEPA Case No. 294—90—AC)
(Administrative Citation)
LINDELL LOVELESS,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD BY
(J.
C. Marlin):
This matter comes before the Board on a September 25,
1990
motion to vacate default order filed by the respondent.
On
September 27,
1990, the Board issued an Order requesting more
information on this matter from the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency).
On October
17,
1990 the Agency filed
a response to the Board Order of September 27,
1990.
On February 5,
1990,
the Agency inspected the respondent’s
site.
Based on that first inspection,
a package consisting of
photographs, plat maps, deeds and the site inspection report were
transmitted to the home office of the Agency where “the package
was reviewed by the Enforcement Decision Group
EDG)
which
reviews all matters and then issues a decision as to action to be
taken.”
In this matter,
the EDG required that an Administrative
Warning Notice
(AWN)
be sent to the respondent.
The
AWN
was
issued two months after the inspection, on April
2,
1990.
The
AWN allowed the respondent approximately one month to rectify the
pollution problem.
A second inspection was held on May
10,
1990.
As a result
of the second inspection an Administrative Citation was
personally served to respondent on July
5,
1990.
A pre—
enforcement conference letter
(PECL) was mailed to the respondent
on July 11,
1990.
Respondent sent separate replies to each Agency
communication within a reasonable period of time.
All three
replies were sent only to the Agency and deny the allegations of
wrongdoing,
challenge the statutory basis of the alleged
violations
in the administrative citation,
state actions taken
toward compliance, and generally argue with the Agency’s
interpretation of the Act.
No petition for review was filed with
the Board.
Respondent has timely moved to have the Default Order
vacated.
In support of his motion he states that he “mistakenly
responded to the person who had written to me instead of to the
115—489
person that the letters had instructed me to reply to.”
In
addition, he states that efforts were made to clean up the site
and that if it were not for the extremely wet spring season the
site would have been cleaned up by the May 7,
1990 date set in
the AWN.
The Agency requests that the Board deny respondents motion
to vacate because “the Agency believes respondent has failed to
show a meritorious reason for setting aside the Order of
Default.”
The Agency contends that respondent’s claim of
confusion on how to contest the administrative citation is
unwarranted because the citation form includes instructions on
how to initiate review and because respondent “received,
along
with his Citation,
a separate piece of colored paper giving
further clarification of the review process and the distinction
between the two Agencies
--
the Board and the EPA.”
The Board
notes that the “piece of colored paper” or
a copy thereof,
is not
included in the administrative record filed with the Board.
In
the future,
the Board would like that paper included in the
administrative citation filed with the Board whenever it has been
sent to the respondent.
The Board finds that the respondent had ample notice of how
to contest the administrative citation before the Board.
The
respondent failed to contest the citation.
The motion to vacate
is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member Jacob
D.
Dumelle dissented.
I,
Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on the
~
day of
________________,
1990, by a vote of
Dorothy M~Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
115—490