ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 13, 1990
PETER ARENDOVICH
PATRICIA LISTEPNANN
Complainants,
V.
 )
 PCB 88—127
(Enforcement)
KOPPERS COMPANY,
 INC.,
 )
Respondent.
MR. PETER ARENDOVICH
AND
MS. PATRICIA LISTERNANN, APPEARED PRO
SE;
AND
MR. CHESTER
 R. BABST III
AND
MR. JOSEPH K. REINHART, ATTORNEYS AT
LAW, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD BY
 (3.
 C.
 Marlin):
On February
 8,
 1990, the Board entered an Interim Opinion
and Order in this matter. which found by a 4-3 vote that Koppers
Company,
 Inc.
 (Koppers) had violated Section 9 of the
Environmental Protection Act.
 That Interim Opinion and Order
found that emissions of naphthalene and creosote odors from the
Koppers’ facility were unreasonable and constituted
 a substantial
interference with the enjoyment of life and property of the
complainants.
 After making that finding, the Board retained
jurisdiction and ordered Koppers to prepare and submit a report
on the methods,
 costs,
 and timing of pollution control strategies
taken by Koppers and planned for the future.
 Koppers filed its
 report, compiled by Mittlehauser Corporation,
 a chemical
engineering company, on April
 25,
 1990.
 Petitioner, Peter
Arendovich,
 filed comments on May 24,
 1990.
The report filed by Koppers corrects a deficiency
 in the
record of this matter.
 The report details Koppers efforts to
control the air emissions from various equipment and operations.
Repairs and modifications that have been completed include the
repair or replacement of hatches and vents on a number of
systems,
 the renovation of the distillation vacuum system,
 and
the installation of inert gas purge systems to reduce vapor
emissions during the cleaning of transmission lines.
 Other
control strategies in the process of being completed include the
modification and upgrading of the “F-2” topped tar fume recovery
system.
The report also specifies three emission sources where
future improvements are being investigated.
 Koppers
 is
conducting an evaluation of the available odor abatement
115—05
technologies for the creosote blending and loading storage tanks.
A similar study
 is being conducted for the naphthalene unloading
process.
 An evaluation has already been completed on the options
for connecting the coal tar feed tanks to the fume system,
 F—2,
or the addition of a new fume system.
 The report states that
 that study led Koppers to a determination that both options would
not be cost effective.
Mr. Arendovich, one of the petitioners, criticized the
report and the improvements made at the Koppers’ plant.
 He
stated that the creosote odors still occur and interfere with his
enjoyment of life and property.
 Mr. Arendovich would like to see
a monitoring system installed at the Koppers Plant.
The Board will accept Koppers’ report and commitment to
improve
 its operations.
 Koppers
 is hereby ordered to continue
efforts to minimize odor emissions and finish the projects listed
in the report submitted to the Board on April
 25.
 This Final
Order does not preclude other enforcement actions being brought
against Koppers if the violations continue.
The foregoing discussions, together with those included in
the February 8,
 1990 Interim Order, constitute the Board’s
findings of facts and conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, the Board hereby Orders Koppers
Company, Inc.,
 respondent, to undertake and perform Item Numbers
I through XII of Table 4-1 from the “Illinois Pollution Control
Board Report submitted to the Board on April 25,
 1990.
 A copy
Of
Table 4-1 is appended to the Order.
 In addition, Koppers
 is to
add a yearly inspection of all hatches and vents within the vent
maintenance program.
 Koppers shall cease and desist from all
 violations of the Act and Board regulations.
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
I11.Rev.Stat.1989,
 ch.
 111
 1/2, par.
 1041, provides for appeal of
final Orders of the Board within 35 days.
 The Rules of the
Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Members
 J.
 D.
 Dumelle and B. Forcade dissented.
I,
 Dorothy M.
 Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on the
~,
 —~
 -
__________
 day of
 v’:
~
 .
 ,
 1990,
 by
 a vote of
7
A
 ~
 ///‘~)
 ~
 ~
Dorothy M.
 Gunn,
 Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
115—06
IMPLFHENIAIION
 OF
 FM
 COHTROIS
SINCE
 AUGUST
 •
 88
Item
 Emission
 Additional
 Additional
 Esthnated
No.
 Source
 Cnnt
rot
 Measure
 Cost
 X
 of
 Reduc
 t
 ion
V.
 Coat
 Tar
 Unloading
 (1)
 Maintain ten~erelu,e
monitoring
 10
 88
 None
 10
(2)
 Continue
 water
 caps
 on
 tanks
 10-88
 None
II.
 Coat
 Tar Feed Tanks
 Investigated feasibility of connecting
tanks
 to 1-2
 ftsne
 system.
 12-89
 Hot Cost
Ifte
t
ive
III.
 Coat
 Tar Distillation
 tar distillation
 vucutla
 system
renovated.
 1-90
 $?6S~O00
IV.
 Dchyth-at ion Water
 (1) Decanter
emissions
 are
 burned
 in
Storage
 the
 tube
 heater,
 On-Going
(2) Floating oils are pu~edto tank
#13.
 On-Going
(3)
Effluent
 srat~ is Txm’t,ed to
 tanks
Nil
 arid
 Ni8.
 On-Going
Refined
 Chemical
 Oil
 (1)
 Inspect
 existing storage system.
 11-88
 ---
 90
Storage
 (2) Repair worn hatches
 arid vents.
 12-88
 t
 5.000
(3) Cor~-iect tanks
 12
 and
 13 to the
 5-90
 Included
 in
 1-2
in~roved
1-2
 ftjne
 System.
 Sy~ten~
 Re~ovation
VI.
 Creosote
 Storage
 (1)
 Inspect
 exsting
 storage
 system.
 11-88
 90
(2)
 Repair
 worn
 hatches
 and vents.
 12-88
 ~
 250
(3)
 Renovate
 Topped
 Tar
fl.sne
 Systems
 5-90
 ~36l~OO0
1-2.
VII.
 Creocote
 Blending
 and
 Evaluate
 need
 for
 fune
 system
 on
 9-90
Loading
 creosote
 loading
 rind
 blend
 tanks
T-SUI~jtJ?~iirxj
 305.
TabLe 4-1
 (Cont~cJ.)
item
 Emission
 Additional
 Additional
 Estimated
No.
 Source
 Control
 Measures
 Date
 Cost
 X
 of
 Reduction
VIII.
 Bitunen Storage
 (1) Inspect
 existing storage system.
 11-80
 ...
(2)
Repair
 worn
hatches
 and
 vents.
 3-89
 $
 7,000
(3) Extend inert gas
purge
 to
 between
 3-89
 ~
 4~000
transfer
 lines.
IX.
 Coat
 Tar
 Pitch
 Storage
 (I)
 Vent
 tank
 emissions
 through
 pencil
 OnCning
 80
pitch
 tune
 recovery
 system.
(2)
 Check
 inert
 gas purging
 line.
 10-88
(3)
Inspect
 existing
 storage system.
 12-88
(4)
 Repair
 worn
 hatches
 and
vents.
 389
 S
 2,500
X.
 Bitumen
 Drijnning
 (1)
 RepaIr
 bitumen
 cooler.
 3-89
 5
 10~000
 80
(1)
 Extend
 inert
 gas
 purge
 to
bitumen
 889
 t
 4~OUO
drt.snnt ng.
Xi.
 Coal
 Tar
 Pitch
 (1)
 Vent
 emissions
 through
 pencil
 pitch
 On-Going
 90
fume
 system 1-5.
(2)
 Modify loading
spouts
 to
 reduce
 3 89
 5
 4,000
emissions.
XII.
 Nopbthatene
 Unloading
 Continue
 Present
 Operation
 On-Going
TOTAL
 tóo8,7SO
tfltz2**:XfltZ
*
 Over
 arid
 above
 emission
 control
 measures
 taken
 prior
 to
 8-15-88.