ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 13, 1990
PETER ARENDOVICH
PATRICIA LISTEPNANN
Complainants,
V.
)
PCB 88—127
(Enforcement)
KOPPERS COMPANY,
INC.,
)
Respondent.
MR. PETER ARENDOVICH
AND
MS. PATRICIA LISTERNANN, APPEARED PRO
SE;
AND
MR. CHESTER
R. BABST III
AND
MR. JOSEPH K. REINHART, ATTORNEYS AT
LAW, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD BY
(3.
C.
Marlin):
On February
8,
1990, the Board entered an Interim Opinion
and Order in this matter. which found by a 4-3 vote that Koppers
Company,
Inc.
(Koppers) had violated Section 9 of the
Environmental Protection Act.
That Interim Opinion and Order
found that emissions of naphthalene and creosote odors from the
Koppers’ facility were unreasonable and constituted
a substantial
interference with the enjoyment of life and property of the
complainants.
After making that finding, the Board retained
jurisdiction and ordered Koppers to prepare and submit a report
on the methods,
costs,
and timing of pollution control strategies
taken by Koppers and planned for the future.
Koppers filed its
report, compiled by Mittlehauser Corporation,
a chemical
engineering company, on April
25,
1990.
Petitioner, Peter
Arendovich,
filed comments on May 24,
1990.
The report filed by Koppers corrects a deficiency
in the
record of this matter.
The report details Koppers efforts to
control the air emissions from various equipment and operations.
Repairs and modifications that have been completed include the
repair or replacement of hatches and vents on a number of
systems,
the renovation of the distillation vacuum system,
and
the installation of inert gas purge systems to reduce vapor
emissions during the cleaning of transmission lines.
Other
control strategies in the process of being completed include the
modification and upgrading of the “F-2” topped tar fume recovery
system.
The report also specifies three emission sources where
future improvements are being investigated.
Koppers
is
conducting an evaluation of the available odor abatement
115—05
technologies for the creosote blending and loading storage tanks.
A similar study
is being conducted for the naphthalene unloading
process.
An evaluation has already been completed on the options
for connecting the coal tar feed tanks to the fume system,
F—2,
or the addition of a new fume system.
The report states that
that study led Koppers to a determination that both options would
not be cost effective.
Mr. Arendovich, one of the petitioners, criticized the
report and the improvements made at the Koppers’ plant.
He
stated that the creosote odors still occur and interfere with his
enjoyment of life and property.
Mr. Arendovich would like to see
a monitoring system installed at the Koppers Plant.
The Board will accept Koppers’ report and commitment to
improve
its operations.
Koppers
is hereby ordered to continue
efforts to minimize odor emissions and finish the projects listed
in the report submitted to the Board on April
25.
This Final
Order does not preclude other enforcement actions being brought
against Koppers if the violations continue.
The foregoing discussions, together with those included in
the February 8,
1990 Interim Order, constitute the Board’s
findings of facts and conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, the Board hereby Orders Koppers
Company, Inc.,
respondent, to undertake and perform Item Numbers
I through XII of Table 4-1 from the “Illinois Pollution Control
Board Report submitted to the Board on April 25,
1990.
A copy
Of
Table 4-1 is appended to the Order.
In addition, Koppers
is to
add a yearly inspection of all hatches and vents within the vent
maintenance program.
Koppers shall cease and desist from all
violations of the Act and Board regulations.
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
I11.Rev.Stat.1989,
ch.
111
1/2, par.
1041, provides for appeal of
final Orders of the Board within 35 days.
The Rules of the
Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Members
J.
D.
Dumelle and B. Forcade dissented.
I,
Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on the
~,
—~
-
__________
day of
v’:
~
.
,
1990,
by
a vote of
7
A
~
///‘~)
~
~
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
115—06
IMPLFHENIAIION
OF
FM
COHTROIS
SINCE
AUGUST
•
88
Item
Emission
Additional
Additional
Esthnated
No.
Source
Cnnt
rot
Measure
Cost
X
of
Reduc
t
ion
V.
Coat
Tar
Unloading
(1)
Maintain ten~erelu,e
monitoring
10
88
None
10
(2)
Continue
water
caps
on
tanks
10-88
None
II.
Coat
Tar Feed Tanks
Investigated feasibility of connecting
tanks
to 1-2
ftsne
system.
12-89
Hot Cost
Ifte
t
ive
III.
Coat
Tar Distillation
tar distillation
vucutla
system
renovated.
1-90
$?6S~O00
IV.
Dchyth-at ion Water
(1) Decanter
emissions
are
burned
in
Storage
the
tube
heater,
On-Going
(2) Floating oils are pu~edto tank
#13.
On-Going
(3)
Effluent
srat~ is Txm’t,ed to
tanks
Nil
arid
Ni8.
On-Going
Refined
Chemical
Oil
(1)
Inspect
existing storage system.
11-88
---
90
Storage
(2) Repair worn hatches
arid vents.
12-88
t
5.000
(3) Cor~-iect tanks
12
and
13 to the
5-90
Included
in
1-2
in~roved
1-2
ftjne
System.
Sy~ten~
Re~ovation
VI.
Creosote
Storage
(1)
Inspect
exsting
storage
system.
11-88
90
(2)
Repair
worn
hatches
and vents.
12-88
~
250
(3)
Renovate
Topped
Tar
fl.sne
Systems
5-90
~36l~OO0
1-2.
VII.
Creocote
Blending
and
Evaluate
need
for
fune
system
on
9-90
Loading
creosote
loading
rind
blend
tanks
T-SUI~jtJ?~iirxj
305.
TabLe 4-1
(Cont~cJ.)
item
Emission
Additional
Additional
Estimated
No.
Source
Control
Measures
Date
Cost
X
of
Reduction
VIII.
Bitunen Storage
(1) Inspect
existing storage system.
11-80
...
(2)
Repair
worn
hatches
and
vents.
3-89
$
7,000
(3) Extend inert gas
purge
to
between
3-89
~
4~000
transfer
lines.
IX.
Coat
Tar
Pitch
Storage
(I)
Vent
tank
emissions
through
pencil
OnCning
80
pitch
tune
recovery
system.
(2)
Check
inert
gas purging
line.
10-88
(3)
Inspect
existing
storage system.
12-88
(4)
Repair
worn
hatches
and
vents.
389
S
2,500
X.
Bitumen
Drijnning
(1)
RepaIr
bitumen
cooler.
3-89
5
10~000
80
(1)
Extend
inert
gas
purge
to
bitumen
889
t
4~OUO
drt.snnt ng.
Xi.
Coal
Tar
Pitch
(1)
Vent
emissions
through
pencil
pitch
On-Going
90
fume
system 1-5.
(2)
Modify loading
spouts
to
reduce
3 89
5
4,000
emissions.
XII.
Nopbthatene
Unloading
Continue
Present
Operation
On-Going
TOTAL
tóo8,7SO
tfltz2**:XfltZ
*
Over
arid
above
emission
control
measures
taken
prior
to
8-15-88.