ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 12,
1976
OLIN CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 76—165
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
DISSENTING OPINION
(by Mr. Dumelle):
This is a difficult case upon which to dissent.
I agree with
the majority of the Board and with the record on the hazards involved
in dismantling these buildings rather than burning them.
Most of the emissions from the buildings are of a de minimus
nature.
However,
the Train v. NRDC decision,
421 U.S.
60
(1975)
prohibits State variances when ambient air quality standards are
in violation.
Air quality in the nearby area would be impacted by the
1Q00 lbs.
of particulate to be emitted in the proposed single day
of burning.
The particulate standard of 75 ug/m~on an annual
average was violated in 1975 at Granite City
in
5 locations with
levels being recorded of 158,
138,
105,
97 and
96 ug/m3.
The
same standard was also violated at Cahokia
(103), Wood River
(81),
East St. Louis
(80), and Alton
(78).
(See 1975 Annual Air Quality
Report issued by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
p.
42).
Were these four buildings to be used for firefighting
instruction, then a permit could be issued by the Illinois Environ-
mental Protection Agency under Rule 504 (a) (1)
of the Air Pollution
Control Regulations and no variance would be needed.
But that
Rule does not cover buildings used in explosives manufacturing
and should not be used as a subterfuge to avoid the variance
issue.
23
—
335
—2—
What simply must be done is to bring the air of the Metro
East area to clean and healthy levels and then this type of issue
would not squarely face the Board.
I am not comfortable in this
dissent but I feel the U.S. Supreme Court has given all of us no
choice in the matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Qt~#~
1~L
~cob
D.
Dumelle
I, Christan L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Dissenting Opinion was submitted on the
~
day of August,
1976.
Christan L. Moffett.,/~’~rk
Illinois Pollution ~~?rol
Board
23—336