ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 20,
    1976
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—18
    CITY OF PERU,
    a municipal
    )
    corporation,
    Respondent.
    CONCURRING OPINION
    (by Mr.
    Young):
    Count
    IV of the Complaint alleges that Respondent caused
    or allowed paint wastes to be dumped on the site without a
    permit in violation of Rule 310(b) of the Solid Waste Regulations
    and of Section 21(b)
    of the Act.
    I concur in the finding of
    the violation of Rule 310(b)
    as admitted by Respondent in the
    Stipulation of the parties entered into the record at the hearing.
    However, in my judgment, violation of Section 21(e)
    of the
    Act
    is more properly charged in an action arising from the violation
    of Rule 310(b), rather than Section 21(b).
    Doing so would be
    consistent with the language of Section 21(e) which expressly
    provides that no person shall conduct any refuse disposal opera-
    tions without
    a permit granted by the Agency.
    Village of Paw Paw,
    PCB 75—358
    (1976),
    is consistent with this view.
    I concur with the Order of the Board in this matter.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Concurring
    Opinion was
    submitted on the
    ~
    day of
    1976.
    Illinois Pollution
    Board
    21—455

    Back to top