ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 6, 1978
CITY OF PANA,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 78—145
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Young):
This matter comes before the Board on
a Petition filed
on May 17, 1978, by the City of Pana for a permanent variance
from Rules
203(c),
402 and 404 (f) (ii) (A), all of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution,
of the Board’s Rules and Regulations,
as
those Rules apply to phosphorus.
The Environmental Protection
Agency filed a Recommendation on June 16,
1978, which recom-
mended that the variance be denied, or in the alternative,
that it be granted for a period of five years subject to
certain conditions.
No hearing was held;
the City of Pana
waived hearing in the Petition and made no request pursuant
to Rule 406 of the Board’s Procedural Rules on receipt of
the Agency Recommendation.
Section 36(b)
of the Environmental Protection Act
authorizes the Board
to grant variances for a period of
time not to exceed five years;
the Petitioner in requesting
a permanent variance seeks relief which the Board
is not
authorized to grant, Monsanto v. PCB,
367 N.E.2d 684
(1977).
The Board will also dismiss the request for
a variance
from Rule 404 (f) (ii) (A)
as unnecessary since the grant of
relief from Rule 203(c) would remove any phosphorus water
quality violation from consideration for
a Pfeffer exemption
under Rule 404 (f) (ii).
The City of Pana,
Christian County,
Illinois, owns and
operates
a 0.70 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting
of a primary clarifier, trickling filter, secondary clarifier,
chlorine contact tank, anaerobic digesters and sludge drying
beds
(Pet. p3).
The existing facilities operate under an
NPDES Permit,No.
IL 0022314,
as modified by a USEPA Enforce-
ment Compliance Schedule Letter establishing interim effluent
concentration limitations of
30 mg/i of BOD5 and 50 mg/i of
suspended solids
(Rec. p3).
31.55
—2—
The City of Pana has completed a Facilities Plan and
a Sewer System Evaluation Survey under a Federal Step
1
grant awarded October 22,
1975
(Rec. p2).
The City proposes
the construction of a new advanced wastewater treatment
facility and to phase out
t1~existing facility on completion
of the new plant
(Pet. p3).
The proposed facility will
discharge to Coal Creek, approximately
50 stream miles above
Carlyle Lake.
Because the concentration of phosphorus
in Carlyle
Lake exceeds the standard of Rule
203(c),
the application
of Rules
203(c)
and 402
to the proposed facilities of the
City of Pana would establish a phosphorus effluent concentra-
tion limitation of 0.05 mg/i from the plant.
Petitioner
concludes that removal of phosphorus
to
a concentration of
0.05 is technologically and economically unfeasible for
the average community (Pet. p3);
the Agency believes
that
such removal is technically feasible but economically un-
reasonable
(Rec. p4).
The Board is familiar with the problems facing dischargers
in meeting the 0.05 mg/lphosphorus limitation.
City of
Hoopeston,
PCB 76-234,
24
PCB
441; Southern Illinois University
at Edwardsviile, PCB 77-ill,
25 PCB 775; Valley Water Company,
Inc., PCB 77—146,
25 PCB 289.
In those,
and a number of other cases, the Agency and
the Board have recognized that it is not economically feasible
for the petitioners therein to comply with an effluent con-
centration of 0.05 for phosphorus.
In further recognition
of this difficulty,
the Agency has petitioned the Board in
R76-1 for approoriate amendments
to the phosphorus effluent
limitations and water quality standards of Chapter
3.
If
the amendments proposed in R76-1 were ad~ptedwithout change,
the City of Pana would be required to treat
its effluent to
meet a phosphorus
effluent concentration limitation of 1.0
mg/l since the facilities will serve a population equivalent
greater than 1500
(Rec. p3).
Petitioner has included provisions
for removal of phos-
phorus to an effluent concentration of 1.0 mg/i in the design
criteria for the proposed treatment facility
(Pet.
p3) but
argues that since the cost of phosphorus removal
to 1.0 mg/i
exceeds any environmental benefits,
to require any phosphorus
removal in the proposed facility would constitute an arbitrary
and unreasonable hardship
(Pet.
p4-6).
The Agency does not
feel that the justification supports
the relief requested and
recommends that this request be denied
(Rec. p1).
Although the
impact of the Petitioner’s discharge of phosphorus on Carlyie
31.56
—3—
Lake appears to be minimal
(Pet. p4-5) the Petition is silent
regarding the impact of such discharge on the intervening
receiving waterways.
Because of the pendency of R76-l,
including the economic
impact study and subsequent economic impact hearings, and
for the reasons stated above, the Board will not and cannot
grant Petitioner relief from an effluent limitation which
has only been proposed to the Board and which has not yet
been fully heard.
The Board will welcome the participation
of the City of Pana in R76-l.
Based upon the foregoing,
the Board will grant to the
City of Pana the same measure of relief during the pendency
of R76-l that has been granted to other petitioners facing
similar problems because of the application of Rules
203(c)
and 402.
The Petitioner will be required to include provisions
for removal of phosphorus from the effluent of the proposed
plant
to a concentration of 1.0 mg/i for the period of the
variance granted herein.
Pursuant to Rule 914, the Board will direct the Agency
to modify NPDES Permit No.
IL 0022314 consistent with the
Opinion and Order herein including such interim effluent
limitations
as may reasonably be achieved through the
application of the best practicable operation and maintenance
practices in the existing facilities.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
1.
The Village of Pana
i.s granted a variance for
the
operation of its wastewater treatment plant from Rules
203(c)
and 402 of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution Rules and Regulations
regarding phosphorus until July 6,
1983,
subject to the
following conditions:
a)
This variance will earlier terminate
upon adoption by the Board of any
modification of the existing phosphorus
water quality standards and effluent
limitations and the Village shall comply
with such revised regulations when
adopted by the Board.
b)
Petitioner shall provide space
in its
design for storage of chemicals,
and
for mixing and dosing equipment capable
of meeting a phosphorus effluent con-
centration of
1 mg/i,
or to whatever
alternative level may be established
by the Board.
31.57
—4—
c)
In the event that grant funds become
available during the period of this
variance,
the
Village shall incorporate
in any design and specification adequate
provision for the installation of equip-
ment for the removal of phosphorus which
will provide the best practicable treat-
ment technology for the removal of
phosphorus over the life of the works.
2.
The Petition for Variance from the phosphorus require-
ments of Rule 404 (f) (ii) (A)
in Chapter
3:
Water Pollution
Regulations,
is hereby dismissed.
3.
Petitioner, within 30 days of the date of this Order,
shall request Agency modification of NPDES Permit IL 0022314
to incorporate all conditiOns of the variance set forth herein.
4.
The Agency, pursuant to Rule 914 of Chapter
3, shall
modify Petitioner’s NPDES permit consistent with the conditions
set forth in this Order including such interim effluent limita-
tions as may reasonably be achieved through the application
of best practicable operation and maintenance practices in the
existing facilities.
5.
Within forty-five
(45) days of the date of this Order,
the Petitioner shall submit to the Manager, Variance Section,
Division of Water Pollution Control,
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois,
62706,
an executed Certification of Acceptance and Agreement
to be bound to all terms and conditions of the variance.
The
forty-five day period herein shall be stayed during judicial
review of this variance pursuant to Section 31 of the Environ-
mental Protection Act.
The form of said certification shall
be
as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I,
(We), ___________________________
having read
the Order of
the Pollution Control Board in PCB 78-145,
understand and accept said Order, realizing that such
acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
binding and enforceable.
SIGNED
TITLE
DATE
3158
—5—
IT IS
SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the ab ye Opinion and Order were
adopted on the
~
day of
_________________—,
1978 by a
vote of
It—p
-
Christan L. Moff~~/Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
31~59