ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
8, 1976
ILLINOIS NATUR1~LHISTORY SURVEY,.
)
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 76—43
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Dr.
Satchell):
The Illinois Natural History Survey filed a variance
petition on February
13,
1976,
seeking relief from Rule 203(h)
of Chapter
3: Water Pollution Regulations.
Petitioner seeks
to apply rotenone on sections of Lake Shelbyville to obtain
a
t’standing crop”
survey.
The Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency) Recommendation to grant the variance was filed
on March
17,
1976.
No hearing was held.
Lake Shelbyville has a surface acreage of 11,100 acres
and discharges to the Kaskaskia River.
The lake is not a
public water supply source although Vandalia, thirty miles
downstream, uses the Kaskaskia River for its water supply.
Petitioner proposes to treat only two small
(3-5 acre)
bays
(average depth of 5
feet)
without tributary streams.
The
waters of these bays are to be isolated from the reservoir
by polyethylene sheeting.
Petitioner states that the rotenone
will be applied at
a concentration of
1 part per million and
will remain toxic for approximately six hours.
Petitioner
states that
as soon as the dead fish are processed,
the area
will be detoxified with potassium permanganate.
Petitioner
also indicates that the plastic barrier may be allowed to
remain in place for three or four days
as
a safety precaution.
Petitioner proposes that the application be made by its
assistant aquatic biologist,
Dr. John Tranquilli.
Petitioner alleges that Rule 203(h)
of Chapter 3 con-
stitutes an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship on Petitioner’s
research activities
as there
is no feasible alternative
sampling procedure to determine fish populations.
The Agency Recommendation agrees with Petitioner, that
given Petitioner’s research functions and the lack of feasible.
alternative fish census techniques,
a denial of the variance
would work an unreasonable hardship.
21— 123
—2--
Petitioner has provided letters approving the treatment
from the U.S.
Corps of Engineers and the Illinois Department
of Conservation.
The Agency believes that these two approvals
constitute approval by all the holders of interest in Lake
Shelbyville.
The Agency also notes that this petition for variance is
essentially similar to Petitioner’s request for a variance
in PCB 75—322,
in which the Board allowed Petitioner to
apply rotenone to Lake Shelbyville.
The Agency projects no
downstream environmental harm from the application.
The Board finds that Petitioner would be subject to an
unreasonable hardship by a variance denial, as no suitable
alternative means exist to obtain the information it requires.
In addition the application procedure reflects sufficient
safeguards for the protection of non-subject portions of the
lake and its aquatic populations.
Lastly, there appears to
be no inherent hazard to a public water supply.
Therefore,
a variance from Rule 203(h)
is granted to the Natural History
Survey.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law,
ORDER
The Pollution Control Board hereby grants the Natural
History Survey a variance from Rule 203(h)
of Chapter 3,
during the Fall of 1976, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the toxicants be applied by Dr. John Tranquilli,
Assistant Aquatic Biologist of the Illinois Natural History
Survey, such application to be made with all proper safety
precautions taken by applicator;
2. That the Petitioner use polyethylene sheeting to
retain the water
in the bays while the chemicals remain toxic;
3. That the
embayed
areas will be detoxified with
potassium permanganate upon completion of the study;
4. That within seven days after the date of this Board
Order the Petitioner shall execute and forward to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Variance Section,
Water Pollution Control,
2200
Churchill
Road,
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
and
to
the Pollution Control Board a Certi-
fication
of
Acceptance and Agreement to
be
bound to all terms
and
conditions
of
the
variance.
The
form
off
said
Certification
shall
be
as
follows:
—3—
CERTIFICATION
I
(We),
having read
and fully understanding the Order of the Pollution Control Board
in
PCB
76—43
hereby
accept
said
Order
and
agree to be bound
by
all
of
the
terms
and
conditions
thereof.
Mr. Dumelle concurs
Signed
Title
Date
I, Christan L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board,
hereby cer,~ifythe above Opinion and Order
were adopted on the
____________
day of
_____________,
1976
by a vote of
_______
Illinois Pollution
21
—
125