ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
31,
1989
ANTHONY KOCHANSKI,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 88-16
HINSDALE GOLF CLUB,
Respondent.
ORDER OF
THE BOARD
(by J. Anderson):
On August
16,
1989,
the complainant
filed a Motion for
Reconsideration requesting that the Board reconsider
its July
13,
1989 decision in this matter.
The respondent
filed a response
to
the motion on August
22,
1989.
Additionally,
the Board received
notice on August
21,
1989 that the respondent has appealed the
July 13th decision to the Second District of the Illinois
Appellate Court.
The notice states that the appeal was filed on
August 17,
1989.
In
its response,
the respondent asserts that jurisdiction
in
this matter
is now lodged
in the Appellate Court given the
appeal.
The response also requests that certain portions of the
motion be stricken from the record.
The Board’s procedural rules allow motions
for
reconsideration provided that such a motion
is filed within 35
days of the adoption of the Board’s Order.
35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.246(a).
Since
the complainant’s motion was
filed
in a timely manner,
the Board has jurisdiction to act on the motion notwithstanding
the respondent’s appeal
filed with the Second District.
See
Clean Air Coordinating Committee v. Environmental Protection
Agency,
42
Ill. App.
3d
124,
355 N.E.2d 573
(1st Dist.
1976)
(An
appeal
of
a Board decision taken prior
to the Board’s disposition
of
a timely filed motion for reconsideration was premature and
ineffective.); Supreme Court Rule 303(a);
Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1987,
ch.
110,
par.
3—101.
Aden v. City of Freeport,
PCB
86—193,
(November
3,
1988).
The Board anticipates
that
it
will
rule on the complainant’s
motion and the respondent’s response at the Board meeting
of
September
13,
1989.
IT
IS SO
ORDERED.
102—201
2
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, he~ebycertify t)~atthe above Order was adopted on
the
~
day of
______________,
1989, by a vote
of
_____________________
I
Pollution Control Board
102—202