ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January
    26, 1984
    CONOCO,
    INC.
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 82—100
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J.
    D. Dumelle):
    This matter comes before the Board upon an October 27,
    1983
    motion for substitution of
    the
    petitioner filed on behalf of
    Conoco,
    Inc.
    (Conoco)
    in
    this
    permit appeal proceeding.
    By Order
    of December 15,
    1983, the Board requested the parties to brief
    the issue of the legality of a permit transfer while an appeal of
    that permit is pending before the Board.
    The Illinois
    Environ-
    mental Protection Agency (Agency)
    filed its brief on January 17,
    1984.
    Conoco has not submitted any such brief.
    The Board
    finds
    the Agency’s arguments that such transfer is
    permissible convincing in this case since the subject matter and
    supporting facts remain unchanged.
    However,
    the Board notes that
    the Agency has not yet received
    the
    documents which are necessary
    for the transfer of the permit
    (and which have,
    apparently, been
    lost in the mail).
    The motion is, therefore, granted contingent
    upon the Agency~stransfer of the permit.
    The Board notes that
    such substitution constitutes an amendment to the petition for
    review which restarts the Board~s 90—day period for decision.
    IS
    IS
    SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board hereby certify
    that
    the above Order was adopted on
    vote
    of
    day of
    ,
    1984 by a
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett, Cl
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    56-57

    Back to top