ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March
9,
1989
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 84—92
RICHARD KROHN and PARKWAY
)
BANK
& TRUST CO.,
as
)
Trustee
under
Trust
No.
4730,
Respondents.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by 3D.
Dumelle):
This matter
is before
the Board upon its own motion.
On
June
3,
1988,
an executed Stipulation and Proposal
for Settlement.
(stipulation)
was filed with the Board.
On June 16,
1988,
the
Board adopted
an Order denying
acceptance of the stipulation and
stating that “if
the Board does not receive an amended
stipulation, curing
the noted defect, within 90 days of
the date
of this Order,
the Board
will schedule an additional hearing
in
this matter.”
On November
14, 1988
(151 days later),
the parties
filed
a joint motion
for extension of time
to
file
an amended
stipulation,
requesting
until February 17,
1989
to
file the
amended stipulation.
On November
17,
1988,
the Board granted the
motion.
To date,
no amended stipulation has been filed,
nor has
any reason been given
for failure
to comply with the
Board Order.
It appears to
the
Board
that this proceeding suffers
for
want of prosecution.
In
a recent Order
(Modine Manufacturing
Company v.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
PCB 87—124,
November
17,
1988),
the Board recognized the need
to tighten
its
procedures.
Consistent with Modine,
the Board will
tolerate
neither
unreasonable noncompliance with
a Board
Order
nor
unjustifiable lack of prosecution of
a proceeding.
Section
107.101(c)
of the Board’s procedural
rules
(35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
l07.lOl(c))
clearly provides that
the Board may dismiss
a
proceeding
where a party unreasonably fails
to comply with
a
Hearing
Officer
or
Board Order.
Thus,
the Board
today, on its
own motion, hereby dismisses this proceeding without prejudice.
The Board
recognizes
that its Order
of June
16,
1988,
states
that,
in
the event an amended stipulation
is not
filed,
additional hearing
would be scheduled.
However, given
the
subsequent history of this proceeding
the Board
no longer
97—87
—2—
believes an Order scheduling
additional
hearing
is appropriate.
If and when the Complainant
is prepared
to prosecute this
proceeding,
a new docket may be opened.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy
M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
the
_______________
day of
_____________,
1989 by a vote
of
Dorothy M(,A3unn,
Clerk
Illinois P’ollution
Control Board
97—88