ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December
    14, 1978
    OSCAR MAYER
    & CO.,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    78—14
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR. PERCY
    L.
    ANGELO, MAYER, BROWN
    &
    PLATT,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    PETITIONER.
    MR. RUSSELL
    R. EGGERT, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON
    BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    On January
    20,
    1978,
    Oscar Mayer
    & Co.
    (Oscar Mayer)
    filed this
    Petition for Review of Permit Denial before the Board alleging that
    the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency) erred in its
    denial of Oscar Mayer’s permit application for a continuous
    large
    sausage process
    (CLSP)
    at the company’s Chicago plant.
    A hearing was
    held
    in
    this matter on October
    3,
    1978.
    No citizens attended the
    hearing, and the Board has received no public comment in this matter.
    Early in this proceeding
    a question arose concerning the scope
    of discovery in an action under Section
    40 of the Act to contest
    Agency denial of the permit.
    The Agency took an interlocutory
    appeal from an order of the hearing officer compelling answers
    to
    Interrogatories which the Agency claimed were beyond the scope of dis-
    covery
    in this type of proceeding.
    The Board accepted the inter-
    locutory appeal and,
    in a comprehensive interim order, carefully
    delineated the scope of discovery in this case.
    In its interim
    order of June
    14,
    1978,
    the Board stated:
    The ultimate question to be decided by the Board
    in this
    matter
    is whether or not emissions from the process
    for
    which the permit was denied exceed limitations of Rule
    203(b) of Chapter
    2 of the Board’s Regulations.
    Essential
    to the resolution of
    the
    question
    is a determination of
    the Board of the actual weight of the material introduced
    into the process per hour,
    as
    defined by Rule 201 of Chapter
    32—243

    —2—
    2 of the Board’s Regulations.
    To do so the Board needs to
    know only the weight of each material involved;
    the Board
    can then determine which of these materials
    the Board intended,
    by Board Regulation,
    to be included in the proper calculation
    of the actual weight introduced into the process per hour.
    How or why the Agency arrived at
    a different conclusion
    on
    the same facts is simply not relevant to the Board determina-
    tion.
    At the hearing,
    the parties presented a Stipulation of Fact
    for the Board’s consideration in its deliberations.
    In addition
    both parties presented briefs based upon the facts
    contained in
    the
    Stipulation.
    The subject of this permit review proceeding
    is the continuous
    large sausage process
    (CLSP) operated by Oscar Mayer at its meat
    processing plant in Chicago, Illinois.
    In this process large loaves
    of sausage products are progressively smoked,
    cooked and chilled.
    In order
    to produce the smoke needed in the CLSP, hardwood chips
    are fed into smoke generators, the product of which is fed directly
    into the smoke zone of the CLSP for the smoking portion of produc-
    tion process.
    The productivity
    of the CLSP
    is related to the
    amount of woodchips and the amount of meat used;
    the greater the
    amount of meat processed, the more smoke required and the greater
    the amount of woodchips consumed.
    The CLSP processes approximately
    12,000 lbs./hr.
    of meat under normal conditions.
    An Agency permit to operate the CLSP had been obtained by Oscar
    Mayer in 1973.
    Application
    for that permit relied on a process
    weight rate of 12,000 lbs./hr.,
    including both meat and the hardwood
    chips used to produce the smoke.
    Oscar Mayer filed a renewal appli-
    cation in October,
    1977,
    which was essentially identical
    to the
    application previously granted.
    This renewal application was denied
    by the Agency, which alleged that the CLSP’s particulate emission
    rate of 1.8 lbs./hr.,
    as calculated by the Agency using standard
    emission factors, exceeded the allowable emission rate of 203(b)
    of
    the Board’s Air Regulations.
    (Stip.
    p.3)
    In its determination,
    the
    Agency excluded the weight
    of the meat introduced into the process
    from the calculation of process weight rate.
    As a result, the Agency
    has determined allowable emissions from the process
    to be 0.58
    lbs./
    hr., while inclusion of the meat in the calculation would result in
    an allowable emission rate of 13.6 lbs./hr.
    It is therefore obvious
    that inclusion of the weight of the meat
    is essential if the allow-
    able emission rate
    is
    to meet the Agency’s assumed emission rate of
    1.8 lbs./hr.
    The Board
    finds that the question of inclusion of the
    weight of the meat in the calculation of process weight rate
    is
    determinative in this case.
    32—244

    —3—
    In
    a
    recent
    decision,
    United
    States
    Steel
    Corp.
    v.
    EPA,
    PCB
    77—317
    (June
    22,
    1978)
    ,
    the
    Board
    considered
    the
    question
    of
    process
    weight
    rate.
    Both
    in
    that
    opinion
    and
    in
    the
    original
    opinion
    in
    R7l—23, which adopted the process weight rules,
    the Board has stressed
    that the purpose of process weight rates
    is to relate the allowable
    emissions
    directly
    to
    the
    productivity
    of
    the
    particular
    process.
    The
    Board
    finds
    that
    the
    productivity
    of
    the
    process
    in
    this
    case
    is
    the
    amount
    of
    the
    meat
    produced,
    and
    that
    the
    allowable
    emissions
    are
    therefore directly related
    to
    this perameter.
    That
    the
    emissions
    from
    the
    CLSP
    will
    increase
    or
    decrease
    as
    the
    weight
    of
    the
    meat
    processed
    increases
    and
    decreases
    appears
    obvious.
    It
    is
    somewhat
    less
    obvious
    that the total emissions
    from
    the process will increase or
    decrease
    with a change in the amount of wood chips consumed since the burning
    of
    the
    chips
    constitute
    only
    a
    part
    of
    the
    total
    process.
    Since the weight of the meat is
    to be considered for the purpose
    of
    determining the process weight rate and the allowable emissions
    under Rule 203(b)
    of Chanter
    2
    and
    since
    the
    stipulated
    facts
    herein
    indicate that such inclusion will result in compliance with the rule,
    the Board finds that Oscar Mayer has met its burden of proving it
    will not cause a violation of the Act or Regulations and is
    entitled
    to an operating permit for its CLSP operation at the company’s Chicago
    plant.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that the Oscar
    Mayer
    & Co. permit application for its continuous
    large sausage
    process
    at the company’s Chicago, Illinois plant be remanded to the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    for further action consis-
    tent with this Opinion.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, herçby certify
    e abo e Opinion and Order was
    adopted on the
    j*/~ day of
    _______________,
    1978 by
    a vote
    of
    3.Q
    Christan
    L. Moffe ~~Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    3 2—245

    Back to top