ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October
20,
1988
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
(SCHAUMBURG PLANT),
Petitioner,
V..
)
PCB 87—184
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent..
MR.. DANIEL
F.. O’CONNELL, OF GARDNER, CARTON
& DOUGLAS, APPEARED
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER;
MR. JOSEPH
R..
PODLEWSKI,
JR..,
APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT..
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by
R..
C.. Flemal):
This matter comes before the Board upon
a request for
variance filed on November
30, 1987 by Jefferson Smurfit
Corporation
(“Smurfit”)..
Smurfit requests variance from Subpart
P of Part 215
as those
rules apply to Smurfit’s plant
in
Schaumburg, Illinois
(“Schaumburg Plant”),
to allow time to
install emission controls on its printing equipment..
The
variance
is requested
to extend
to March 31,
1989
as
it pertains
to the operation of Smurfit’s extruder and laminator, and to July
1, l~89as it pertains to operation of Smurfit’s flexographic
line
Subpart P of Part 215 was amended pursuant to the Board’s
final order
in R85—2l, Docket B (In the Matter of: Proposed
Amendments
to 35
Ill..
Adm.. Code 215:
Flexographic and Rotogravure
Printing, October
29,
1987)..
The amendment
in pertinent part
provides
at
35
Ill..
Adm.. Code 2l5..245 that flexographic and
rotogravure printing operations which are located in non—
attainment counties and which have aggregate uncontrolled
emissions of volatile organic material (“VOM”) greater than 100
tons per year comply with rules regarding Flexographic and
Rotogravure Printing,
as specified at
35
Ill.. Mm.
Code 215
Subpart P, by December
31,
1987..
Prior
to this amendment Smurfit
1 Smurfit originally requested that variance extend
to December
1,
1989
(Pet,
at
1)..
At hearing
this date was modified
to those
noted
(R
at
118—9)..
93—191
—2—
was exempt from the requirements of Subpart P because
its VON
emissions were less than the then existing 1000 tons per year
exemption
limit..
Because Smurfit
filed the instant variance
petition within twenty days of the effective date of the
amendment, application of the rule is stayed as
to Smurfit
pending
a decision on the variance petition pursuant to
Ill..
Rev..
Stat..
ch..
111—1/2 par..
1038(b)..
On April
4, 1988 the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (“Agency”)
filed
its recommendation (“Agency Rec..”)
that
the requested relief be granted subject to certain conditions,
among which was that the variance terminate on March
31, 1989.
Hearing was originally noticed for June
8, 1988, and subsequently
renoticed and held on September
1, 1988 at the State of Illinois
Center
in Chicago..
No members of the public were
in attendance.
At hearing Smurfit introduced several substantive amendments
to its proposed compliance plan,
including changes
in the
configuration of intended emission control equipment and the
dates
of compliance
(see footnote
1).
Also at hearing,
the
parties agreed, among other matters,
to make additional filings
to update their respective pleadings
CR..
at 127).
Pursuant
thereto the Agency filed an amended recommendation (“Agency
Amended Rec..”)
on October
3, 1988
in which
it noted that it held
no substantive disagreement with Smurfit’s revised proposal,
including the revised compliance dates, and reiterated
its
recommendation that the request be granted.,.
Smurfit has not
filed
a response..
BACKGROUND
Smurfj.t manufactures flexible packaging material for the
food and pharmaceutical industries at a plant located at 1228
East Tower Road
in Schaumburg, Cook County,
Illinois..
Located at
the plant are various flexographic presses, rotogravure stations,
and accompanying printing equipment..
The equipment
is organized
into three
lines:
laminator and extruder lines which serve
the
rotogravure printing operations,
and a flexographic line.
The solvent
fraction of the inks used by Smurfit in its
printing operations includes,
inter alia, ethyl alcohol,
isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl acetate,
ethyl acetate,
isopropyl
acetate, and heptane.
These compounds are classified as volatile
organic material
(“VOM”) under
the Board’s Air Pollution Control
Regulations
(35 Ill. Mm.. Code 211.122).
VOM emissions from Smurfit’s flexographic presses and from
the rotogravure stations
on
its extruder
are presently
uncontrolled and vent directly through stacks
to the atmosphere
(Pet,
at
3)..
VOM emissions from the rotogravure station on the
laminator line are partially controlled
by
a thermal
incinerator..
93—192
—3—
Smurfit’s 1987 uncontrolled VON emissions were
357..84 tons
(R.. at
37)..
Historically, annual plant—wide VON emissions have
been between 300 and 350
tons
(Pet, at
4;
R.
at
41).
Approximately half of Smurfit’s plant—wide VOM emissions are
attributable to printing operations, with the flexographic
presses accounting for 7
and the rotogravure operations
accounting
for the remainder
(93)
of
this amount..
COMPLIANCE PLAN
Smurfit offers
a two—part compliance program, one part
addressed
to the extruder and laminator lines
and one part to the
flexographic presses..
Smurfit proposes to install
a new thermal
incinerator on the extruder and laminator
lines
(R.
at 36).
Pursuant thereto, Smurfit was
issued construction permit No.
87110095 by the Agency on June 13,
1988.
For control
of the
flexographic operations,
Smurfit proposes to reconfigure
its
presses and to convert the existing thermal
incinerator
to
a
catalytic incinerator by adding
a catalytic module
(R.. at 59);
a
new rotogravure station will also be added to
this
line
(Id,)
A
construction permit
for the second part,
No.. 88060055, was issued
by the Agency on August 15, 1988.
Both construction permits require that stack tests be
undertaken to demonstrate
compliance..
Smurfit intends to have
the new incinerator
installed by the end of 1988 and to be able
to demonstrate compliance within 90 days thereafter,
or by the
end of March, 1989 (R. at 58),
However, the incinerator on the
flexographic line cannot be installed until April
1,
1989 due
to
plant modifications which are
to be undertaken first
(R.
at 30—
3)..
Accordingly, Smurfit proposes to demonstrate compliance on
the flexographic line within 90 days thereafter,
or by July 1,
1989
(R.. at 60,
66)..
The Agency agrees that both demonstration
deadlines are reasonable
(R.
at 108),
and recommends that the
variance be conditioned accordingly (Amended Agency Rec..
at
2)..
HARDSHIP AND ENIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The Agency summarizes the matter of hardship as follows:
Immediate compliance with the VOM requirements of
Section 215, Subpart P
is not feasible.
Indeed,
the
IEPA has stated as
a matter
of record
in the
rulemaking proceeding which
led
to the adoption
of
Section 2l5..245 that “expeditious installation” of
control equipment at affected facilities would
take
one year
from the date that regulation was enacted..
The Agency does not expect Smurfit to be able
to do
in two months
(November and December of
1987) what
it
reasonably expects will take one year at the
earl iest.
93—193
—4--
The Agency agrees with Smurfit that compliance with
the VOM emission limitations of Section 215.401 will
create an unreasonable hardship for
its Schaumburg
operations.
Because Smurfit cannot realistically
install and operate control equipment immediately,
its only compliance alternatives are
to either
reduce
operations so that VOM emissions do not exceed
100
tons annually or shut down its printing operations.
In light
of the fact that more than 80
of all
products manufactured at Smurfit are printed using
the flexographic and rotogravure presses,
a shut down
of the presses would very likely result
in a shut
down of the entire plant and a temporary loss of 87
jobs with a $3.2 million annual payroll..
A decrease
in production significant enough
to reduce VON
emissions from its printing operations
of 100 T/yr
or
less would,
in
all likelihood, have
a similar adverse
impact upon plant operations..
Agency
Rec..
at 22-23.
Contrasting with hardship is
the issue
of environmental
impact..
The ozone monitor nearest to Smurfit’s facility
is
located at 2nd and Thacker
in Des Plaines, approximately eight
miles east of the Schaumburg Plant.
No ozone excursions were
recorded at this monitor during 1986,
but two were recorded
during 1987
(Agency Rec,
at 15).
Nevertheless, given the large
number of VON sources
in the Chicago area and the multiple number
and magnitude of excursions beyond
the ozone standard throughout
the Chicago area during both 1987 and 1988,
it
is difficult to
quantify Srnurfit’s contribution to this environmental problem.
However, Smurfit’s compliance program,
if successful, will
significantly reduce
the amount of VOM emitted by its facility.
CONCLUSION
In view of the hardship here demonstrated, as well
as the
projected environmental effects during the term of
this proposed
variance,
the Board
finds that adequate proof has been presented
that immediate compliance with 35
Ill. Mm, Code 215, Subpart P,
would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship upon
Petitioner..
Accordingly, the relief will be granted with
conditions consistent with the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act..
This Opinion constitutes
the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions
of law in this matter..
93—194
—5--
ORDER
Petitioner, Jefferson Smurfit Corporation,
is hereby granted
variance from 35
Ill..
Adm..
Code 215, Subpart P
(35 Ill. Adm. Code
215..401—2l5..4l7)
for its facility located at 1228 Tower Road
in
Schaumburg,
Illinois, subject
to the following conditions:
1)
With respect to the operation of the line(s)
to be
controlled by the thermal afterburner, as
identified
in
construction permit
No.. 87110095
issued June 13,
1988,
variance begins on January
1,
1988 and expires on March
31,
1989.
2)
With respect
to the operation of
the line(s)
to be
control by the catalytic afterburner, as identified
in
construction permit No. 8806055 issued August 15,
1988,
variance begins on January
1,
1988 and expires on July
1,
1989.
3)
During
the term of this variance, Petitioner shall
submit quarterly written reports
to the Agency detailing
all progress made
in achieving compliance with 35
Ill,
Adm.. Code 215 Subpart P at
its Schaumburg
Plant..
The
first quarterly report shall be due thirty
(30) days
from the date of this Order.
The quarterly reports
shall
include monthly VOM emission data from the press
department.
The first quarterly report shall also
include copies of material data sheets showing the
composition
(in terms
of percentage of solid, solvent,
and water)
of all inks used during the rotogravure
printing process..
All of the above information shall
be
submitted to the Agency at the following addresses:
(a)
Manager, Permit Section
Division of Air Pollution Control
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1340
N.. Ninth Street
Springfield, Illinois
62702
(b)
Manager, Field Operations Section
Division of Air Pollution Control
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1701 S.
First Avenue, Suite 600
Maywood,
Illinois
60153
4)
Petitioner
shall abide by all conditions of construction
permits No. 87110095,
issued June 13,
1988 and No..
8860055,
issued August 15,
1988..
5)
Operation of the thermal afterburner constructed
pursuant
to construction permit No. 87110095,
issued
June 13, 1988,
is not allowed until
an operating
permit
93—195
—6--
is
issued by the Agency, pursuant to
35
Ill.
Adm.. Code
Section 201.143.
6)
Operation of the two new rotogravure presses constructed
pursuant to construction permit No,
8806055,
issued
August 15, 1988,
is
not allowed until an operating
permit is issued by the Agency, pursuant to
35
Ill.. Adm.
Code Section 201.143..
7)
Within 45 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner
shall execute and forward to Joseph
R.. Podlewski, Jr.,
Enforcement Attorney, Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency,
1701 S. First Avenue, Suite 600, Maywood,
Illinois 60153,
a Certification of Acceptance and
Agreement to be bound
to all terms and conditions of
this variance,
The 45—day period shall be held
in
abeyance during any period that this matter
is being
appealed..
Failure to execute and forward
the
Certificate within 45 days renders this variance void
and of no force and effect as
a shield against
enforcement of
rules from which variance was granted.
The form of said Certification shall
be as
follows:
CERTIFICATION
I
(We),
,
hereby
accept and agree
to be bound by all terms and conditions of the
Order of the Pollution Control Board in PCB 87—184, October
20,
1988.
Petitioner
Authorized Agent
Title
Date
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act, Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1987
ch.
1111/2 par. 1041, provides for appeal
of final
Orders of the Board within
35 days.
The Rules of the Supreme
Court
of Illinois establish filing requirements.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
93—196
—7--
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk
of
the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that
the above Opinion and Order was
adopted on the
~26tZ
day of
___________________,
1988,
by a
vote
of
7—o
~
~).
/LY
Dorothy r4.(~’unn, Clerk
Illinois P~’l1utionControl Board
93—197