ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January
9,
1975
NATIONAL BY-~PRODUCTS, INC.
Petitioner,
vs.
)
PCB 74~322
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
ORDER
OF
THE BOARD ON MOTION FOR MODIFICATION
(by Mr.
Henss):
Petitioner requests modification of the Board Order of
November
7,
1974
to
show the granting
of
variance from Section
9(a)
of the Environmental Protection Act.
On November
7,
1974
the
Board issued its Order granting National By-Products
a
variance from Rule 802(b)
(odors)
of the Air Pollution Control
Regulations for its Decatur rendering plant.
That same Order
denied National By-Products a variance from Section 9(a)
of the
Environmental Protection Act although variance from both Section
9(a)
and Rule 802(b) had been previously granted
in
PCB 73-208.
The
prior
variance
was
granted
provided
that
Petitioner
comply
with
certain
requirements
including
the
installation
of
a
hotwell
cover
for
odor
control.
National
By—Products
completed
the
hotwell
cover
program
and
complied
with
the
intent
of
our
Order in PCB 73-208 but complaints from neighbors were still
being received by the Company and by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
Because of these complaints the Board decided on
November 7 not to extend the Section 9(a) variance.
Upon receiving Petitioner!s Motion for Modification and the
subsequent pleadings by the Agency and Petitioner, the Board has
decided to reconsider its decision.
We have reconsidered the
character and degree of interference with the health, general
welfare and physical property of the people who live near the
rendering plant; the social and economic value of the rendering
plant;
the suitability of the rendering plant to the area in which
it is located, including the question of priority of location in
the area and the plans to close the plant in 1975;
and the technical
practicability and economic reasonableness or reducing or eliminating
15
—
193
Based upon this review and the arguments of the part.ies,
it
is the
opinion
of the Board that National By-Products. is entitled
to a rariance from Section
9(a)
of the Act and it
shall be
so
ordered.
The reason for now allowing the variance from Section 9(a)
is that it is readily apparent that Petitioner has attempted to
accomplish all economically reasonable and technically feasible
control measures on
a very old plant.
Som.e reduction in odor las
occurred but the neighbors are still bothered to
a certain degree.
The
remaining
control
measure
would
be
to
shut
the
old
plant
down,
which in our opinion,
is unreasonable
in
light
of
the
degree
of the odor problem.
The plant is
now
scheduled
for
permanent
closure on June 15,
1975,
With the conditions
already imposed
upon National we now believe
that the threat of further action in
the
form
of
prosecution
because
of
occasional
violation
of
Section
9(a)
is
unwarranted.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that;
I.
The
Board Order issued on November 7,
1974
in
PCB
74-322 be modified
by
deleting
that
language
which
denies
variance from
Section
9(a)
of
the
Act.
2.
National By—Products,
Inc. be granted variance from
Section 9(a)
of the Environmental Protection Act for
its Decatur rendering plant from August 15, 1974
until
June 15,
1975.
The variance is subject
to
all
conditions
specified in the November
7,
1974
Order.
I, Christan L, Moffett, Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board, hereby
certify the
above
Order w~sadopted this ~
day
of
~
1975 by a vote
of
toO,
15—
194