ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
5,
1976
STEPAN CHEMICAL COMPANY,
)
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 75-503
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF TEE BOARD
(by Mr.
Zeitlin):
The Petition for Variance in this matter was filed by
Stepan Chemical Company
(Stepan)
on December
24, 1975,
seeking a
seven month extension from December 31, 1975 until July 31, 1976
of a Variance previously granted
(PCB 74-317)
from Rule 404(b)
of
Chapter
3:
Water Pollution,
of the Board’s Rules and Regulations.
PCB Regs.,
Ch.
3,
Rule 404(b).
The Agency’s Recommendation was
filed on July 14, 1976.
No hearing was held in this matter.
Stepan operates a chemical plant located on the Des Plaines
River
in Will County, Illinois, at which it produces phthalic
anhydride,
liquid detergent intermediates, dry cleaning emulsifiers,
polyurethane foam systems and high purity specialities for the
cosmetic industry.
That plant and its wastewater discharges are
fully described in three previous Board Opinions:
EPA v.
Stepan
and Stepan v. EPA
(consolidated), PCB 72-489, 73-184,
11 PCB
7
(Jan.
24,
1974); citizens for a Better Environment v.
Stepan and
Stepan
v.
EPA
(consolidated),
PCB 74—201,
74—270, 74—317,
15 PCB
445,
15 PCB 467
(Mr. Dumelle concurring),
15 PCB 469
(Dr.
Odell
dissenting
as to the penalty)
(Feb.
14,
1975);
Id.,
(Supplemental
Opinion and Order on Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration),
16 PCB 539
(May
8,
1975).
A brief summary of the facts is necessary
here.
An Enforcement action
(PCB 72-489)
filed by the Agency on
December
13, 1972 charged Stepan with various water pollution
violations with regard to its Millsdale Plant.
In the Opinion and
Order on that and a consolidated Variance case
(PCB 73-184)
filed
May 2,
1973,
the Board penalized Stepan $12,500 and granted Variance
from Rule 404(f) until July 15,
1974.
In the consolidated Enforcement, Variance and Permit Appeal
cases, PCB 74-201, 74-270 and 74-317, the Board again found Stepan
in violation and again granted Variances.
As later modified by the
Board’s Supplemental Opinion and Order of May 8,
1975, our Order
there allowed Stepan a Variance from the rules applicable to its
discharge until December 31,
1975.
In addition,
our Order required
that Stepan cease its discharge into Cedar Creek and discharge via
pipeline into the Des Plaines River.
23
—
219
—2—
More recently, all parties to the latter case moved for a remand
of the matter to the Board from the Appellate Court,
Third District,
and submitted a Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement to the Board
asking certain modifications of our Orders
(as amended)
in PCB 74-201,
74—270 and 74—317.
Those modifications are approved
in a separate
Opinion and Order adopted today.
In this case, Stepan asks that the Variance previously granted
be extended by the Board to allow its discharges to the Des Plaines
River to which its effluent has been piped since August
8,
1975.
The basis of that request
is that an additional seven months will
be needed to place certain new wastewater treatment facilities into
full operation as a result of necessary construction plan modifica-
tions and unanticipated equipment delivery delays.
Since our previous Variance Orders, Stepan has been forced to
make plan modifications for the additions to the wastewater treat-
ment plant.
The primary change,
resulting from predicted foaming
problems, has been to convert a pre—aeration lagoon into an activated
sludge basin, which will control foaming and allow additional DOD
removal.
Although Stepan decided in October, 1975 to convert this
3.5 million gallon activated sludge basin to a similarly sized
tank,
in an effort to speed construction, the conversion to activated
sludge has nonetheless delayed compliance.
Additional problems have arisen as a result of delayed equipment
deliveries.
Stepan was unable to obtain an acceptable delivery date
for certain necessary pumps and was forced to change vendors with
regard to those items.
As a result, delivery could not be scheduled
until April,
1976.
It appears
that these delays were unavoidable, and that Stepan
has attempted to achieve compliance
as quickly as possible under
its
Variances.
Depriving Stepan of a shield from enforcement during a
period when it could not have complied would impose an unreasonable
hardship.
Balanced against the environmental harm likely to result,
that
hardship leads us to decide that the requested Variance
is warranted.
Stepan acted quickly following our previous Orders to divert its
effluent from Cedar Creek to the Des Plaines River,
which
has more
assimilative capacity.
As noted in our Opinion today in PCB 74-201,
74—270 and 74-317, Stepan has also made other operating changes to
increase the quality of that effluent.
The Agency, recommending
that the Variance be granted, claims that the
75 and
80 mg/i BOD
and SS limits under the Variance are reasonable
in light of the
proposed settlement of the appeal in PCB 74—201,
74—270 and 74-317,
the implementation of a costly compliance program and the short term
remaining on the Variance request.
Finally, and most importantly,
this extension calls for complete compliance by July 31,
1976.
23
—
220
—3—
The conditions on the Variance shall be the same as those in
PCB 74-201,
74—270 and 74-317, as amended May 8, 1975 and separately
today.
These include extensive testing and reporting to the Agency.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that Petitioner
Stepan Chemical Company be granted a Variance from Rule 404(b)
of
Chapter
3: Water Pollution, for discharges from its Millsdale Plant
to the Des Plaines River from December 31,
1975 until July 31,
1976,
subject to the following conditions:
1.
Compliance with all conditions in the Board’s Order in
PCB 74—201,
74—270 and 74—317
(consolidated),
as subsequently modified
by the Board on May
8,
1975 and August
5,
1976.
2.
Petitioner shall, within twenty-one
(21)
days of the date
of this Order, execute and forward to the Environmental Protection
Agency, Control Program Coordinator, 2200 Churchill
Road, Springfield,
Illinois 62706,
a Certificate of Acceptance in the following
form:
I,
(We), __________________________
having read
the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
case No. PCB 75-503,
understand and accept said Order,
realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
SIGNED
TITLE
DATE
Mr. James Young abstained.
I,
Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the a ove Opinion and Order
were
adopted on the~~1~day of
________,
1976,
by a vote of
q...~
-.
CQ&~nL.Moffett(~~
Illinois Pollution Co
1 Board
23
—
221