RECEIVED
    CLERKS OFFICE
    0208-00
    1
    JUL
    142005
    BEFORE THE
    ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL BOARD
    STATE OF ILLINOIS
    Pollution
    Control Board
    DORIS
    GLAVE,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 02-11
    (Citizens Enforcement
    --
    Noise)
    BRENT HARRIS, PATTY
    HARRIS,
    and WINDS CHANT KENNEL,
    INC.,)
    )
    Respondents.
    VILLAGE OF GRAYSLAKE,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 02-32
    (Citizens Enforcement
    --
    Noise)
    WINDS CHANT KENNEL,
    INC.,
    )
    (Consolidated)
    Respondent.
    NOTICE OF FILING
    To:
    (See attached
    Service
    List.)
    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that
    on this
    14th
    day of July 2005,
    there was filed with the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board or Hearing Officer, the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay, which
    is attached
    and
    herewith served
    upon you.
    WINDS
    CHANT KENNEL,
    INC.,
    et
    at.
    By:r~~.
    ~
    \~
    EIiz4~eth
    S.
    i4arvey/
    NOne
    of the attorney~
    for Respori~~~~t
    Elizabeth
    S.
    Harvey
    Peter A. Pogue
    SWANSON,
    MARTIN &
    BELL, LLP
    One IBM
    Plaza,
    Suite 3300
    330
    North Wabash Avenue
    Chicago, Illinois 60611
    Telephone:
    (312) 321-9100
    Firm ID.
    No.
    29558

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,
    the
    undersigned
    non-attorney,
    state that
    I
    served
    a
    copy
    of the Joint
    Motion
    to
    Stay
    to
    counsel of record
    in theabove-captioned matter via U.S. Mail at One IBM
    Plaza, Chicago,
    IL 60611
    on or before 5:00 p.m.
    on
    July
    14,
    2005.
    /Si~,t4uZ~L
    ~/~Rrz~Jc4t/
    (jønette
    M.
    Podlin
    x
    Under penalties as
    provided
    by law
    pursuant to
    735
    ILCS 5/1-109,
    I certify
    that the statements set
    forth
    herein
    are true
    and
    correct.

    SERVICE LIST
    PCB 02-1 1/PCB 02-32
    (Consolidated)
    Mr. Glenn
    Glave
    Mrs.
    Doris Glave
    18530 Brooke Avenue
    Grayslake, Illinois 60030
    Attorney for Village of Grayslake:
    Matthew D.
    Heinke
    Holland &
    Knight
    LLP
    131
    South
    Dearborn
    Street
    30th
    Floor
    Chicago, Illinois
    60610
    Victor
    P.
    Filippini,
    Jr.
    Darrow A. Abrahams
    Holland & Knight,
    LLP
    131
    South Dearborn
    Street
    30th
    Floor
    Chicago, Illinois 60603
    Bradley
    P. Halloran,
    Hearing
    Officer
    Illinois Pollution
    Control Board
    James
    R.
    Thompson Center
    100 West Randolph
    Street
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago,
    Illinois
    60601

    RECEIVED
    CLERKS OFFICE
    JUL
    142005
    ILLINOIS POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    STATE OF ILLINOIS
    Pollution Control Board
    DORIS GLAVE and
    GLENN GLAVE,
    Complainants,
    )
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 02-11
    (Citizens Enforcement
    --
    Noise)
    BRENT HARRIS,
    PATTY
    HARRIS,
    and WINDS CHANT KENNEL,
    INC.,
    )
    Respondents.
    )
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    )
    )
    VILLAGE
    OF
    GRAYSLAKE,
    )
    Complainant,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 02-32
    (Citizens Enforcement
    --
    Noise)
    WINDS
    CHANT KENNEL, INC.,
    )
    (Consolidated)
    )
    Respondent.
    )
    JOINT MOTION
    TO STAY
    The parties
    to this matter, BRENT
    HARRIS, PATTY HARRIS, and WINDSCHANT
    KENNEL,
    INC.
    (collectively,
    “respondents”),
    DORIS
    GLAVE
    and
    GLENN
    GLAVE
    (collectively,
    “the
    Glaves”),
    and
    THE
    VILLAGE
    OF
    GRAYSLAKE (“the
    Village”), jointly
    move the Board for
    a stay of these consolidated matters.
    This motion is brought pursuant
    to
    Section
    101.514 of the
    Board’s procedural rules.
    (35 III.Adm.Code
    101 .514.)
    1.
    The parties have reached a settlement ofthis matter.
    In brief, respondents have
    agreed
    to
    build
    an
    enclosed
    kennel
    at
    a
    different
    location
    on
    respondents’
    1

    property, and have agreed to cease using the
    existing kennel to house dogs or
    other “noise-making animals”.
    A copy ofthe executed settlement agreement is
    attached as Exhibit A.
    2.
    In
    exchange for respondents’ agreement to build the
    new kennel,
    cease using
    the
    existing
    kennel,
    and
    record
    a
    covenant,
    the
    Glaves and
    the
    Village
    have
    agreed to
    dismiss
    their complaints, with
    prejudice.
    However,
    the
    agreement
    does
    not require the Glaves and the Village to dismiss their complaints
    until 21
    days after the “Cessation
    Date,” provided the terms of the settlement agreement
    are
    satisfied.
    The
    “Cessation
    Date”
    is
    defined
    as
    15
    days
    after
    the
    Village
    issues a certificate ofoccupancy for the new kennel, or May 2, 2006, whichever
    is sooner.
    3.
    The
    parties
    have
    agreed
    to
    seek
    a
    stay of
    these
    proceedings,
    to
    allow
    the
    respondents to build the
    kennel and transfer the
    dogs from the existing kennel.
    (See Exhibit A, paragraph
    7.)
    Seeking a stay of the case,
    rather than dismissing
    it now, protects the Glaves and the Village
    in
    the unlikely event that the dogs are
    not
    moved from
    the
    existing kennel
    by the Cessation Date.
    In that event,
    the
    Glaves and the
    Village
    can chose to terminate the settlement agreement
    and
    pursue this action before the
    Board.
    4.
    Therefore, the
    parties jointly seek
    a stay of these
    cases until May
    3, 2006.
    (In
    the event that the Cessation Date turns out to be sooner than May 2, 2006, the
    Glaves and the Village are under an obligation to dismiss these cases within 21
    2

    days,
    provided the terms of the settlement agreement are satisfied.
    Therefore,
    the cases would be dismissed prior to the
    expiration of the
    stay.)
    5.
    These cases are enforcement cases, and thus have
    no decision
    deadline.
    6.
    Allowing a stay of these cases to May
    3, 2006, would protect the parties,aflow
    time for the implementation of the agreement, and
    conserve the parties’ resources.
    WHEREFORE,
    the
    parties jointly move the Board for
    a stay of these proceedings
    until May 3,
    2006, or for such
    other relief as the Board deems
    appropriate.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRENT HARRIS, PATTY HARRIS, and WINDS
    CHANT KENNELS
    By~~
    ~
    ç
    On~’~f
    their attorn~yd,an~-autIi’~dzed
    to
    N..~grYonbehalf
    of
    the
    GIave~)ndthe
    Village
    Elizabeth
    S.
    Harvey
    Peter A.
    Pogue
    SWANSON, MARTIN & BELL, LLP
    One IBM
    Plaza,
    Suite 3300
    330
    North Wabash Avenue
    Chicago,
    IL 60611
    Telephone: (312) 321-9100
    3

    Back to top